• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Ask a physicist anything. (2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
E=MC[sup]2[/sup]
Surely you don't mean that closing the lid adds energy, and thus mass, to the box? Because I have legal documentation confirming that this is not a valid answer:

You're in a sealed room, their is a scale on the table & a open Jack-In-The-Box.
You have to make the Jack-In-The-Box weigh more.
How can you do this without adding anything to the Jack-In-The-Box?

:p
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,903
17,803
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟465,825.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Surely you don't mean that closing the lid adds energy, and thus mass, to the box? Because I have legal documentation confirming that this is not a valid answer:



:p

:doh:
I need to listen to the book again to get the question fully correct :D :D
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
39
London
✟37,512.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I would have taken the Jack off the table and put it on the ground. Being infinitesimally closer to the Earth's center of mass should make it weigh infinitesimally more.

The question didn't say you had to increase it's mass :p Just it's weight.

This one, I like.
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,903
17,803
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟465,825.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
I would have taken the Jack off the table and put it on the ground. Being infinitesimally closer to the Earth's center of mass should make it weigh infinitesimally more.

The question didn't say you had to increase it's mass :p Just it's weight.

Good one :D
 
Upvote 0

Supreme

British
Jul 30, 2009
11,891
490
London
✟37,685.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Physics is my weakest science, and I no longer study it. Could you explain circular motion to me?

So far I've grasped:

Objects that go around in a circle have a force called centripetal force.
Centripetal force is not a force in its own right and depends of other forces (eg gravity)
The object is always accelerating because it is always changing velocity (this bit I've never really understood).

Cheers.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Physics is my weakest science, and I no longer study it. Could you explain circular motion to me?

So far I've grasped:

Objects that go around in a circle have a force called centripetal force.
Centripetal force is not a force in its own right and depends of other forces (eg gravity)
The object is always accelerating because it is always changing velocity (this bit I've never really understood).

Cheers.
To understand why the object is always accelerating, it's best to think of a small object orbiting a large object (e.g., a satellite and the Earth). As the satellite moves forward, it's constantly being pulled by the Earth's gravity: in other words, it's constantly under acceleration. However, the satellite is also moving 'forward' (that is, at a 90° angle to the direction gravity is pulling in). So gravity is pulling it down, and its own velocity is moving it forward. The net result is that it moves forward and down at the same time.

Now, if you get this just right, the object won't have changed its distance from the Earth: though it would have moved forward, and thus moved farther from the Earth, gravity will have pulling it inwards, keeping it at the same distance. In other words, it's moving in a circle.

Or you can think of it this way: the object tries to fly off in a straight line, while the Earth pulls it round due to gravity. Because the 'straight line' it's trying to fly off in has now changed due to gravity, we say that it has accelerated: acceleration is any change in velocity, and velocity is 'speed with direction'. So velocity can change, even if your speed does not.

Confusing, isn't it?

Basically, gravity cures an objects trajectory round. If the velocity is just right, the path it will take will actually curve round onto itself, and it will thus be orbiting the Earth. This image shows what happens to the path of the object if it has different velocities; in some cases it flies off, in others it curves round.

300px-Epi_half_spirals.svg.png

Second, the object is always accelerating because it's always falling to Earth: gravity is always pulling it downwards, its velocity is always changing.
 
Upvote 0

TerranceL

Sarcasm is kind of an art isn't it?
Jul 3, 2009
18,940
4,661
✟120,808.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Something occurred to me the other day.

I'm sitting in my room. Sitting still.

But my house is sitting on a tectonic plate that is moving.

That is sitting on a planet that is spinning.

That planet is orbiting a star.

That is orbiting the black hole at the center of the galaxy.

That is moving with another cluster of galaxies.


Question:

Did I leave anything out?

Anybody have ANY idea how fast i'm actually moving?

Is there anything in the universe that doesn't move?
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,749
6,307
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,147,415.00
Faith
Atheist
Anybody have ANY idea how fast i'm actually moving?

Is there anything in the universe that doesn't move?

With respect to ... ?

I don't know the answer to your question, but I think (and I think your second question implies that you do to) that one needs a reference point.

It may be that any given thing is moving with respect to any other given thing in the universe.

I suspect, too, that my if my speed WRT to some object X is V, that implies that X's speed with respect to me is also V. The question is then, what is moving and how does one tell.

The question is also complex because for any given reference point there is going to be different components. For example, the earth's rotational speed averages to zero (that is, it doesn't contribute) to your average speed rotating about the center of our galaxy.

But, I await the experts ...
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.