• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

Ask a biologist

f3n1xhvn732

Newbie
Dec 21, 2011
20
1
✟22,645.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Private
Disclaimer:
I´m not biologist in the strict terms of the word. I´m a Genomic Biotechnologist, but in my career I studied biology, evolution, genomics, proteomics, molecular biology, genetic engineering and systems biology, also have studied independently biosemiotics and read some books on complex systems biology. So I will try to respond any of your questions if I know the answers. Feel free to ask or contribute if you want.
 

f3n1xhvn732

Newbie
Dec 21, 2011
20
1
✟22,645.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Private
Do u feel evolution is essential to the understanding of how and why organisms react with one another within their species and outside their kind?

Well thats a tricky one. I feel that yes, is essential. But is because of other kind of evidence (fossil evidence, DNA evidence, Chromosomal evidence etc.). The question is more metaphysical in nature, but the evidence is pointing to evolution.

Whats evolution?
Is a change of the genetic components or proportions (and phenotype) of a population over the time. It can be seen, it can be tested (in simulations), and is one of the characteristics of life, the capacity to adapt to the ever changing envirionment. If species not evolve, they cease to adapt, they simply die. And earth have been around millions of years.

About the increasing complexity, well I think we need to study more about how it works than simply "it was selected". That statement simply not responds the question, How? I think the hope for discovering the "rules"
of evolution are in complex systems biology and biosemiotics. But I could be wrong and the complexity to high for undertending.

In life not all is a "contest for survival" against individuals. Is the quest for survival to an ever changing ecosystem. Nothing is static, but life still is here. It even have transformed the world (the levels of oxygen on the atmospher are due the photosynthesis of primitive algae).
 
Upvote 0

jpcedotal

Old School from the Backwoods - Christian Style
May 26, 2009
4,244
239
In between Deliverance and Brother, Where Art Thou
✟28,293.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
so without an evolving element to life, there would be no life simply because life must change to keep up with....what?

What is the relationship of the words "adapt" and "evolve"?
 
Upvote 0

f3n1xhvn732

Newbie
Dec 21, 2011
20
1
✟22,645.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Private
so without an evolving element to life, there would be no life simply because life must change to keep up with....what?

What is the relationship of the words "adapt" and "evolve"?

The first question:
To the envirionment. It always change, it includes changes in other species that interact with it. Also to inner changes produced stochastically in the genomes.

Second question:
Evolve is the change. Adapt is the change in relation of the envirionment.
 
Upvote 0

jpcedotal

Old School from the Backwoods - Christian Style
May 26, 2009
4,244
239
In between Deliverance and Brother, Where Art Thou
✟28,293.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I mean, if I live where it is cold so I make a behavior change (like wearing a coat) and I teach this to my kids who teach it to their kids and so on and even after 10 million generations, physically my descendant still needs a coat but the coat design has been perfected...that 's not evolution but still man has changed in order to survive.
 
Upvote 0

f3n1xhvn732

Newbie
Dec 21, 2011
20
1
✟22,645.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Private
can't one adapt (behavior change) without a physical change occurring even over a long period of time?

Yes but that is adaptation other level. On the phenotipic. But you require a level of complexity already attained that facilitates or permits the change. Not all species are adaptable, some specialize and lose plasticity, so are less adaptable.

In studies on bacteria, first come a phenotypical change and then comes the genetic. The genetic "stores" the change, and keep it if the conditions not change. But also some of them retain plasticity (the potenciality to adaptation) so if the change occurs some of them will survive. When an organism specializes it is in risk of extintion because of the lose of plasticity, but also have the advantage over others. So all the strategies are valid in life unless they kill you (as species).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Lion Hearted Man

Eternal Newbie
Dec 11, 2010
2,805
107
Visit site
✟26,179.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Ever done any thought experiments on what you think extraterrestrial life might look like? What differences do you envision are possible? Do you think nucleic acids are a universal "information molecule", or that proteins are a necessary or ubiquitous component of life?
 
Upvote 0

CabVet

Question everything
Dec 7, 2011
11,738
176
Los Altos, CA
✟43,402.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I mean, if I live where it is cold so I make a behavior change (like wearing a coat) and I teach this to my kids who teach it to their kids and so on and even after 10 million generations, physically my descendant still needs a coat but the coat design has been perfected...that 's not evolution but still man has changed in order to survive.

That is cultural evolution, but very few species are able to do that. We (humans) of course are the masters of it, but many other animals learn behaviors and transmit them culturally.

But chances are that after 10 million generations things will change, even physically. Some will be adaptive, others will not.
 
Upvote 0

Miami Marlins 2012

A critical thinker in a world of superstition
Dec 4, 2011
211
12
Florida, USA
✟22,923.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
What do you think of the research that suggests my European ancestors, as well as Asians, have Neanderthal DNA? How much interbreeding does the study suggest happened, a little or a lot? I ask because looking at Neanderthal skeletons and a Homo Sapiens skeletons, it is clear that there are major differences, despite the things we have in common as cousin species.

I also ask because there are people that are using these studies to support their racial hatred against other peoples (namely people of African ethnicity.) I'm not a geneticist, but I've always believed that the Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid races (if there is even such a thing as races) are so close to each other that any differences are just simply outward appearance and culture. Please excuse me if I used outdated terminology to describe the races, I mean no disrespect if I did. I pulled the terminology out of a somewhat dated scientific book I have.

Can you shed some light into these studies and what it means for our ideas about our modern human species?
 
Upvote 0

CabVet

Question everything
Dec 7, 2011
11,738
176
Los Altos, CA
✟43,402.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The latest research suggests very little interbreeding, I am not an expert, but the last paper I read suggested that an estimated 1% of the DNA in Europeans and Asians is of Neanderthal origin. This difference however is not "fixed", but mostly shifts in allele frequency.

As for the other part of your question, there are very few differences in DNA between races (again, mostly shifts in gene frequencies), and those were not detected before mostly because we didn't have complete genomes, but now we do, including Neanderthal genomes, so we have more accurate comparisons.

Now, racial hatred, people will find all kinds of excuses to hate each other...
 
Upvote 0

f3n1xhvn732

Newbie
Dec 21, 2011
20
1
✟22,645.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Private
What do you think of the research that suggests my European ancestors, as well as Asians, have Neanderthal DNA? How much interbreeding does the study suggest happened, a little or a lot? I ask because looking at Neanderthal skeletons and a Homo Sapiens skeletons, it is clear that there are major differences, despite the things we have in common as cousin species.

I also ask because there are people that are using these studies to support their racial hatred against other peoples (namely people of African ethnicity.) I'm not a geneticist, but I've always believed that the Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid races (if there is even such a thing as races) are so close to each other that any differences are just simply outward appearance and culture. Please excuse me if I used outdated terminology to describe the races, I mean no disrespect if I did. I pulled the terminology out of a somewhat dated scientific book I have.

Can you shed some light into these studies and what it means for our ideas about our modern human species?

Yes is true that there is some interbreeding, but there are few neanderthal genes in the genome of contemporary humans. Also there are evidence of interbreeding with Denisovan but also only a few genes. Is possible that it was useful for the first humans coming out of africa, but for the most part we simply fought and won, and got all the other Homo species extint. The differences between "races" are negligible, but can be useful for some congenital diseases in poblations.

Also a lot of characteristics are more complex than "that gene x for that" and "the gene y is the adiction gene". All that are mere correlations and most of them weak at best. All is too complicated, not simply reduced to the genes. Is more happening in there and is more excinting and mysterious than we thought.

The latest research suggests very little interbreeding, I am not an expert, but the last paper I read suggested that an estimated 1% of the DNA in Europeans and Asians is of Neanderthal origin. This difference however is not "fixed", but mostly shifts in allele frequency.

As for the other part of your question, there are very few differences in DNA between races (again, mostly shifts in gene frequencies), and those were not detected before mostly because we didn't have complete genomes, but now we do, including Neanderthal genomes, so we have more accurate comparisons.

Now, racial hatred, people will find all kinds of excuses to hate each other...

Yes there are some evidence of interbreeding (1-4%) and yes is not fixed.

I mean, if I live where it is cold so I make a behavior change (like wearing a coat) and I teach this to my kids who teach it to their kids and so on and even after 10 million generations, physically my descendant still needs a coat but the coat design has been perfected...that 's not evolution but still man has changed in order to survive.

Its other kind of evolution, is cultural, on the mental level. But like CabVet said in that time is almost sure that some changes in the genome had taken place.

Ever done any thought experiments on what you think extraterrestrial life might look like? What differences do you envision are possible? Do you think nucleic acids are a universal "information molecule", or that proteins are a necessary or ubiquitous component of life?

For the first question. Yes (not only me is a great topic of study in theoretical biology), and the characteristics I think it most have is: semi-permeable membrane (for the difference of inside-outside), some kind information molecule (or molecules), a catalytic molecule (or molecules), a sign system for stimulus and selfcontrol, some way to obtain energy to synthetize these molecules, capacity of self organizing and reproduction.

I think the differences can be in what molecules do retain the information and which system of codification.

For the third. I don´t think nucleic acids are necessarily the "universal" information molecule. It depends on the conditions of the planet. But they most be a kind of polymers that can be complementary and interact in some way that is possible for them to auto replicate (maybe indirectly with other intermediary molecules) and carry some information. For proteins the same, there are other catalytic molecules like RNA but are unstable, it depends on the planet I think.
 
Upvote 0
C

cupid dave

Guest
can't one adapt (behavior change) without a physical change occurring even over a long period of time?


Exactly.

The hormones are also at work even psychologically, affecting behavior, and dispostion can change as the physical accommodations that follow over time chnge ppearances, too.

Note the labortory work in Russia today where they are changing the wild fox into dogs:


foxdog.jpg
 
Upvote 0