VirOptimus
A nihilist who cares.
There is no data or credible evidence suggesting creation or a creator.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There is no data or credible evidence suggesting creation or a creator.Try wording it this way, and see if it helps:
The fact that the universe and life has to be created before the theory of evolution can be used ...
Theistic evolutionist believe God stated evolution by giving us the natural laws to do the grunt work. Creationist believe that God continues to do the grunt work.Even if evolution was the route God took to configure this universe, it is inferior to creationism, since evolution cannot do anything until it has something to work with: ylem.
Evolution is worthless without creation coming first.
The Catholic Church does not prohibit belief in either creationist or evolution which is a reasonable solution to avoid the pretense observed in OPs like the present one.This post is a perfect example of the conclusion reached by academia, when creationism is taken outside of Genesis 1 & 2.
Claims are not evidence.LOL -- first you say:Then when I show you how creation is superior to evolution, you come back with: "Not interested."
Solid aurum.
Evo's become quite emotional when anyone reveals that their evolution theory has no clothes.
Rather than deal with the theory's shortcomings, their SOP is to attack the messenger, try to destroy a reputation rather than refute an argument.
After their "group hug" celebrating another supposed successful defense of their beloved theory, they return to bury their heads back in the safe sand of ignoring the obvious.
The question is: Is creationism superior to evolution?There is no data or credible evidence suggesting creation or a creator.
Me neither.No, really, though. I'm not a hugger.
The question is: Is creationism superior to evolution?
I say a resounding YES.
I'll make a poll.
We'll see.Why bother? That's not going to demonstrate anything other than a bunch of opinions.
If you really want to address the question, you should be looking to define the criteria by which "superior" is being determined in this context.
That you don't seem to have any criteria (other than maybe "X happened before Y") makes the discussion rather meaningless.
Superior to whom?The question is: Is creationism superior to evolution?
I say a resounding YES.
I'll make a poll.
In this case: power.Well, what is your criteria for determining whether something is superior or not?
Mr YlemSuperior to whom?
As I pointed out earlier: No God, no ylem.-sigh-
In this case: power.
In another case: Since God had two choices, Creation or Evolution, and He chose Creation, I'd say Creation for the win.
There is no god(s).As I pointed out earlier: No God, no ylem.
No, of course not. Creationism is based on ancient myths, while ToE enjoys multiple independent lines of evidence. Only people committed to rigid, myopic religious dogma accept creationism. There is no need to seriously entertain creationism at this point.The question is: Is creationism superior to evolution?
I say a resounding YES.
I'll make a poll.
Then there's no ylem.There is no god(s).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?