Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
actually even in that case there is no problem to claim that some people may created the watch earlier than we thought. here is something similar:
World's oldest computer may be older than previously thought
actually even in that case there is no problem to claim that some people may created the watch earlier than we thought. here is something similar:
World's oldest computer may be older than previously thought
It's a problem when we have all those fossils linked to specific periods in history. It's just too complicated.
Theoretically, a common ancestor of the flytrap and the sundew had sticky leaves to trap insects (like the sundew has today).
add a mechanism to close the leaves together,
why? we can push back mammals. there is no evolutionery limitation to that. if we can push a group of fossils by 10 my (similar to what we seen with the tetrapod case) we can also push it by 30 and 40 my.
so this suppose to be the first step. but how many mutations we need to evolve a sticky part? does it need a single gene or more?
this step is even more problematic. we know that such a mechanism need at least several parts at the molecular level. so how such a system that can move the leaves evolve stepwise? it cant.
no. just the computer itself or some parts of it. see? no problem.
Maybe you could explain how you interpret what you see in the diagram below...
I would think you'd be happy when we say that finding a human fossil with a brontosaurus fossil would break the ToE. Then all you'd have to do is find such a case, and the ToE is broken.
the problem is that even biologists dont know the answer.I dunno. I'm a math guy, not a biology guy. I wouldn't know where to begin trying to find the answer to that.
How can you say it can't, when you don't know anything about the genes in question?
ok. lets see. do you agree that even a designer cant make a motion system (like automatic door) by a single part?
so we understand that its basically impossible to do that (automatic door).
You have made that claim over and over. But you have NEVER backed it up with any arguments or any evidence. You have NEVER responded to explanations as to how related parts of a complex system evolve. It's time you stopped making that claim.so how such a system that can move the leaves evolve stepwise? it cant.
but i just explained why it will not be a problem to the theory. scientists push back creatures all the time:
Google is your friend - I try not to be a Google front-end for people who lack initiative, but here is a general overview of the answer to your question : Venus Flytrap origins uncovered.but the venus flytrap move by a special system and not by the wind. so how such a system can evolve stepwise?
realy? where is the answer of how many mutations we need to make the trap moving?Google is your friend - I try not to be a Google front-end for people who lack initiative, but here is a general overview of the answer to your question : Venus Flytrap origins uncovered.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?