Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's a catch-22. If creationists actually understood the theory of evolution and could properly conceptualize it, they likely wouldn't be creationists in the first place. In which case these conversations would never happen.
It's a catch-22. If creationists actually understood the theory of evolution and could properly conceptualize it, they likely wouldn't be creationists in the first place. In which case these conversations would never happen.
There is another catch-22 in this thread. Only Christians can vote on the question, but a person can only find out the results after they have voted, therefore non-Christians can't find out the results. Can some Christian who has voted kindly let the rest of us know the results so far?
Meanwhile creationists and ID followers are afraid to come up with reasonable tests for their beliefs.
Ah, so creationist double standards then, got it!no since we can conclude design in a robot even if we never seen the designer.
lets check your claim. can you show a step by step explanation for the flagellum, at the DNA level? .
Yes, I understand that you must reject the fact that related components of a complex system can co-evolve. But it's only a problem for you.the first step is basically a light detector. but even a simple light detector need at least several parts for its minimal function. therefore even the first step cant evolve stepwise. see the problem?
this is actually what you said. i said that:Is that really what you think evolution is? A creature magically growing eyes in front of us?
Yeesh.
No "step by step" explanation is necessary. Why make such a claim? If demonstrates a complete ignorance of the scientific method. And no, that does not mean the ID guys are right. Your logical skills have left you.lets check your claim. can you show a step by step explanation for the flagellum, at the DNA level? if not then ID guyes are right and evolution theory is meaningless. if evolution is true it should be easy to do so.
That post was in clear English. There is more than one possible pathway to its evolution. The various steps have been confirmed. Why is this so difficult too understand?so how do you know that the evolution of the flagellum is possible? you only believe so.
There are more modern explanations but here is a thirteen year old video:so how do you know that the evolution of the flagellum is possible? you only believe so.
46=yes it occurs , 25=no it does not occur, 6=I don't know
the first step is basically a light detector. but even a simple light detector need at least several parts for its minimal function. therefore even the first step cant evolve stepwise. see the problem?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?