Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I'm not trivializing anything.Your attempts to trivialise the quest of human understanding of origins of life betrays your own faith.
ParadoxicallyYou must know your credibility drops a few points when you suggest that. Anyone reading your posts with an open mind would be discouraged to treat anything else you say as being credible if you try to maintain such a monstrously nonsensical position.
You are supposed to provide a summary of the video according to forum rules instead of forcing us into a contest in guessing the time on Dawkins' wristwatch.I'm not trivializing anything.
Evolution has more missing links than a donut shop has donut holes.
Look at the chart on the wall in this explanation:
It reminds me of a game of connect-the-dots.
Here's the rest of the link:It seems to be a source that points out that not all Christians believe in the standard ID model - which they themselves consider to be God. It seems that you've posted something that confirms my statement.
Thanks, I guess...
Only on paper.Yup ... it's a game of connect-the-dots, isn't it?
Huh? There's nothing in that video which mentions anything about 'missing links'?I'm not trivializing anything.
Evolution has more missing links than a donut shop has donut holes.
Look at the chart on the wall in this explanation:.
Here's the rest of the link:
After how many tries? after how many computers get involved? after how many knock-down-drag-out peer reviews? rigged votes? catering to sponsors? jumping the gun? and who knows what all?And effectively, that's what science is. We confirm the first dot. And then find where that might lead and connect the next one. And so on. It builds upon itself. But you knew that anyway. Joining the dots, filling in the jigsaw, painting a larger picture, adding to the story, taking the next step etc etc.
If you ever got an education you could learn.After how many tries? after how many computers get involved? after how many knock-down-drag-out peer reviews? rigged votes? catering to sponsors? jumping the gun? and who knows what all?
Hilarious! (We all know where that bogus lie led .. straight to court-cases)... rigged votes?
I said look at the chart on the wall.Huh? There's nothing in that video which mentions anything about 'missing links'?
After how many tries? after how many computers get involved? after how many knock-down-drag-out peer reviews? rigged votes? catering to sponsors? jumping the gun? and who knows what all?
QV please:The Vote To Demote Pluto Was RiggedHilarious! (We all know where that bogus lie led .. straight to court-cases)
I've seen even scholarly people here set the scientific method aside to ridicule the Bible.But yet again, you already know this. It does seem petulant to deny that it works when it reaches conclusions which counter your religious beliefs...
Pitching religious belief against physical reality (i.e. science) is a loosing position.I've seen even scholarly people here set the scientific method aside to ridicule the Bible.
They'll preach the scientific method ... until someone brings up something from the Bible ... like basic doctrine ... and there goes the SM out the window.
Haha, no.Submitted for your edification, Brad: The Scientific Method Is A Myth
Indeed. AV has no use for ID.It seems to be a source that points out that not all Christians believe in the standard ID model - which they themselves consider to be God. It seems that you've posted something that confirms my statement.
Thanks, I guess...
That's no excuse to throw doctrine out the window without investigating it first.Pitching religious belief against physical reality (i.e. science) is a loosing position.
Belief has nothing to do with science or physical reality.That's no excuse to throw doctrine out the window without investigating it first.
How many times have I balked that people don't investigate before they communicate?
Yet they'll insist we should all be using the scientific method like it means something.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?