According to the naturalist infinite regress argument, time, event and cause presuppose previous times, events and causes in line with the law of conservation of matter-energy.
As Existence is all, God cannot be transcendent to it. It just is.
Some theists recognniae all the former but find that He nevertheless sustains Existence.

The naturalist atelic argument is that as the weight of evidence shows no teleology [ no preconceived plans] but for unplainning natural selection - the anti-chance agency of Nature-to form new life forms.
There are other naturalist arguments [positive atheist ones [ against God]. In another thread is found the presumption of naturalism , the presumption of rationalism and the ignostic-Ockham.
Then there are our negative arguments in reply to natural theology.

Why do you beleive or why not? Why agnosticism? Some people just don't care one way or another!
Good will and blessings to all!
