- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
so you cannot prove that the universe isn't subject to both mass and time. You specifically made a statement that time does not apply to the universe, but you cannot prove that with astronomy or physics. So, I guess at this point our conversation is done, unless you can add more sources to your argument. Again thanks for the conversation.The universe isn’t inside or outside of anything. It is not subject to anything. Only the things inside it are subject to rules. When you ask questions and then try to answer them for me, it shows that you’re really not here to learn anything because you think you already know the answer when in fact you’re wrong, and that is the height of arrogance. Your continued attempts to argue that because things inside the universe are subject to time, the universe itself must be subject to time, is the fallacy of composition. I have repeated myself far more times than I care to now. To learn more about the fallacy of composition, please visit Fallacy of Composition
And again, my viewpoint doesn’t have to explain anything. I don’t claim to have all the answers. Just because I don’t know something doesn’t mean God is the answer. It is not evidence of God to say “well what else could it be?” That is argument from ignorance. To learn more about the argument from ignorance, please visit Argument from Ignorance
Upvote
0