Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Someone once asked me, “If God never did another thing for you, would you still serve him?” That is ludicrous, of course, since every breath I take is a gift from God, but I knew what he meant. Would I serve God if there were no perks—no answers to prayer, no healing, no heaven? Would I serve him for just his sake alone? How much am I a believer for his sake or for my own? Am I a Christian for what I can get out of it or for what I can give? Made me think? Still does?
It is easy to see that this prayer is not going to bring healing.
Best for him to take the Tylenol and not waste the time with the unbelieving prayer.
Why do I say that?
Because Jesus said this.
Mark 11:24
Therefore I say unto you, What things soever ye desire, when ye pray, believe that ye receive them, and ye shall have them. KJV
The Preacher is waiting until he is healed before he will believe it.
When did Jesus say that we have to believe it before we will have it?
It's obvious that you don't believe God gave someone the intelligence and helped people invent Tylenol to help millions of people in pain.
why limit God so much to only one way of helping people? at least that's what it seems like to me when people say trust God but don't trust the medical help He's obviously put there to help them in their time of need because trusting in the medical help God's put there is a lack of faith. To my way of thinking that's strange and 'limiting God' type thinking to say its a lack of faith to accept God provided medical help.
Its like that guy sitting on the roof of a house in a flood praying for rescue when theres a boat sitting right there but he thinks rescue only comes in the form of a helicopter so he cant see the boat.
we have a different way of looking at the provision of God I suppose, that's ok, but I do find it odd when a lack of faith is defined as not accepting medical help.
Very good questions ... and very worth asking ourselves from time to time, to be sure with ourselves that our hearts are 'right' with God and haven't gone astray.
I'm not disagreeing with you, but wanted to add another angle as food for thought - there is no record in the Bible of Jesus saying to someone: "I'm not going to heal you, you'd be better off going to the doctor."
Regards,
Mike
I can deal with this kind of thinking for a headache or a little bit of temporary and harmless pain , but for the more serious illness , it is a tough pill to swallow to suggest that God is the one who wants it to happen to me.
I have had that kind of thinking applied to me by my earthly father. The whole tough love thing. It did seem to work. But I think the only way that it works is if there has been enough help given in time of need that it is the exception and not the rule for my father not to help me when I need help. Also there is a point where it goes too far and become cruelty and abuse.
I can deal with this kind of thinking for a headache or a little bit of temporary and harmless pain , but for the more serious illness , it is a tough pill to swallow to suggest that God is the one who wants it to happen to me.
I believe in the fact that God gave to us the blessing of medicine. God can and does work through natural means. I think it is odd that some in the church select healing as the area where we can only accept supernatural help and refuse to receive natural help. It is pretty rare that people expect the same for the food we eat. Millions of Christians go to the grocery store and buy food and don't stumble over some need to supernaturally multiple fish and loaves every time they need something to eat. Almost every Christian works a job without seeing a contradiction. They don't expect to find a coin in a fish's mouth every time they need to pay a bill. They simply partake of a paycheck earned through working.
But I do make the distinction that God did not give medicine to the church specifically. God gave the blessing of medicine to the entire human race irrespective of faith. People who have zero faith and are even avowed atheists can go to the grocery store and buy food , can work a job and earn a paycheck , can take a Tylenol and have their headache go away.
On the other hand , God gave the gift of supernatural healing to the Church. Those who operate in it do so on the basis of faith. If the gift of healing were commonly in operation in local churches around the nation , then Christians would not be going to the drug store so often.
Personally I see no need to put God to the test about every ache and pain. But i think we should be concerned if in the course of years , we never experience any supernatural healing from The Lord. It is supposed to be a gift to the church.
QFTFTR, almost no one in this forum was talking about healing until you brought it up (again) to rehash all of the exact same arguments you've been making for years. Just to set the record straight.
But since you brought it up (again), I'll answer it (again).\
....
It's obvious that you don't believe God gave someone the intelligence and helped people invent Tylenol to help millions of people in pain.
Worse still, the people who believe this can't even tell you why. It usually goes something like this;"God's disciplining/teaching/molding you."The formula for this belief is hopelessness with a side of cluelessness.
"Why? What am I supposed to learn?"
"Only God knows. His ways aren't our ways."
I don't know why people find comfort in thinking that God must be afflicting them for some unknowable reason. That's a schizophrenic God indeed; making you sick one minute, healing you the next. You just never know whether you can be healed, or whether God wants you to "learn something" (but we're not quite sure what the "something" is).
I don't know why it's so hard to admit that we just don't have all the answers. I sure don't. But I don't for one minute believe that God is making people sick for some greater, unknowable purpose.
If there is one foundational belief that I have established in my heart it can be summed up in 7 words; God is good. The devil is bad.
In the case of my earthly father , his reason for tough love was to teach me to face the consequences of my choices. Like I said , as long as not carried to the point of cruelty , it was a worthwhile lesson. If a child learns that they will always be bailed out with no consequences for their poor choices , it can encourage even worse choices with the illusion that a person does not actually reap what they sow.
I figure that God can and does chastise us when we make poor choices. But it should not lead to confusion , it should motivate us to seek him diligently for his answer to our suffering. I think suffering can serve that purpose , but seems like a plan B. Plan A would be for us to seek God and make right choices without needing chastisement. But as most of us can attest to , that is not how it usually works out for us with our natural parents and neither is it how it works out for most with their heavenly father. Most of us need discipline sometimes rather than just learning our lesson the easy way by listening to our parents wisdom. As we grow , hopefully we grow out of that.
Truth. Also there is no example of Jesus telling someone no oh wait either.
don't go to the doctor that'll go against the will of god cause after all it's his will that you are sick-----RIGHT!?
I can hardly comprehend the arrogance of those Christians who believe in "faith healing". God is expected to miraculously save their family member but refuses to save someone elses child because those near to him/her didn't pray the proper prayer?! Outrageous! Christians should reject the idea of faith healing in all its forms. Those who cause a death as a result of this nonsense should be duly charged with negligent homicide. They are also worthy of Hell.
Very good questions ... and very worth asking ourselves from time to time, to be sure with ourselves that our hearts are 'right' with God and haven't gone astray.
Here are the "very good" questions you're referring to;
"Would I serve God if there were no perksno answers to prayer, no healing, no heaven?"First of all, heaven should not be denigrated as a "perk". It is the very reason Jesus Christ gave His life for us. What an irreverent way to refer to the thing God thought was worthy of His only begotten Son's life.
Secondly, scripture is quite clear that we are not to forget His benefits;
Psalm 103:2-5 (AMP)That's a whole lot of benefits that God has graciously given to us that we're instructed to not forget.
Bless (affectionately, gratefully praise) the Lord, O my soul, and forget not [one of] all His benefits Who forgives [every one of] all your iniquities, Who heals [each one of] all your diseases, Who redeems your life from the pit and corruption, Who beautifies, dignifies, and crowns you with loving-kindness and tender mercy; Who satisfies your mouth [your necessity and desire at your personal age and situation] with good so that your youth, renewed, is like the eagles [strong, overcoming, soaring]!
Additionally (emphasis added);
Hebrews 11:6 (AMP)It's nothing more than false humility to suggest that we don't really need anything from God.
But without faith it is impossible to please and be satisfactory to Him. For whoever would come near to God must [necessarily] believe that God exists and that He is the rewarder of those who earnestly and diligently seek Him [out].'
Truth. Also there is no example of Jesus telling someone no oh wait either.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?