• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Are you morally obliged to withstand torture in order to save the life of your child?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,724
15,186
Seattle
✟1,180,475.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
don’t you see that this is just a thinly veiled metaphor for giving birth or decide that a person shouldn’t allow their baby to live?

Yes, I see that (though I admit I had missed it at first, must need more coffee). Does that change your answer somehow?
 
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,724
15,186
Seattle
✟1,180,475.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
If someone is made to choose between severe physical torture for themselves, or a quick, painless death for their child, I would certainly admire them for undergoing the torture and saving their child, but I wouldn't condemn them for giving in.

What do you think?

I find it very unlikely that any parent would NOT undergo the torture for their child. I'm sure their are a few,but not many. Would I condemn them? Publicly, no. In my heart of hearts, yes.
 
Upvote 0

Axioma

Eccentric, Culture Ulterior (Absconded)
Aug 10, 2008
1,272
171
39
✟24,776.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Well, to make this a proper analogy to abortion, we'd need to ask if you're morally obliged to torture the people who don't volunteer to be tortured yourself. And even then, it's not entirely accurate given how whimsical Americans can be about torture when it's happening to other people.
 
Upvote 0

Chaplain David

CF Chaplain
Nov 26, 2007
15,989
2,353
USA
✟291,662.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If someone is made to choose between severe physical torture for themselves, or a quick, painless death for their child, I would certainly admire them for undergoing the torture and saving their child, but I wouldn't condemn them for giving in.

What do you think?
So is this like you're in a prison camp and your child is somewhere else and the guard says, we won't torture you but in order for us to refrain an agent will go kill your child?
 
Upvote 0

keith99

sola dosis facit venenum
Jan 16, 2008
23,111
6,802
72
✟380,961.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
So is this like you're in a prison camp and your child is somewhere else and the guard says, we won't torture you but in order for us to refrain an agent will go kill your child?

I was much more inclined to think the question is 'where is the kid'. If you don't tell us we will torture yuo until you do.
 
Upvote 0

cantata

Queer non-theist, with added jam.
Feb 20, 2007
6,215
683
38
Oxford, UK
✟32,193.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
It really doesn't matter what the exact situation is, guys. It's what's called a thought experiment. You can add as many things to it as you like that will make you comfortable with there being a very simple, this-or-that choice, but it's really irrelevant. You must simply assume, for the sake of argument, that you have ONLY two options to choose between: the quick and painless death of your child, or several hours of severe torture for yourself.
 
Upvote 0

spartacus1984

Well-Known Member
Nov 10, 2006
1,044
17
✟1,505.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Can we just get some thing straight,
“cantata” isn’t a psychopath.
and
This “thought experiment” doesn’t mean that “cantata” is a psychopath.
Lot of people did experiment such as these, the Nazis for example, did experiment such as these.
This “thought experiment” doesn’t mean that “cantata” is a Nazi psychopath .
and

I don’t think I would just kill the psychopath who wants to torture you and then save the babies life.

Don’t you agree we really shouldn’t just kill all psychopath and then save the babies life.
And Don’t you agree we really shouldn’t just hunt down psychopath and just killing all psychopath isn’t going to Make the world a safer place for babies ?
and
And Don’t you agree we really shouldn’t just hunt down psychopath and just killing all psychopath isn’t going to Make the world a safer place for all of us?
just Saving babies life really isn’t the most important thing to do?
isn’t it?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
B

B'alaam

Guest
don’t you see that this is just a thinly veiled metaphor for giving birth or decide that a person shouldn’t allow their baby to live?
Oh, it could be.
It could also be a thinly veiled metaphor for the creation of a new nation, or an author trying to create a new book.
I, however, will address it as posted (i.e. without assuming metaphor).

I would also not condemn them for giving in.
See spartacusbot, see how easy that was?

Now to go on a bit-
If I were in that situation, I would like to think that I would withstand the torture (even unto death)...However (and this is the important part) unless I were (or have been) in that specific situation, there is *no way* I can say, one way or another (at least with complete honesty), how I would react. And anyone who hasn't been in that exact situation who says otherwise...well I doubt their honesty.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.