I don't waste time on movies. I did however watch half of this. It is pure garbage.
First, it claims there is a modern horse fossil as old as Eohippus. This is completely false. If you think it is true, document it. A youtube claim does not count as documentation.
Second, it resorts to the old tactic of out of context quotes. I don't think a single one of the people quoted agree that the modern horse did not evolve from Eohippus or a close cousin of Eohippus. Instead, these people are saying either:
1) Evolution branched in many paths, sometimes bigger fossils, sometimes smaller, sometimes more or less toes, rather than a straight line, but eventually got to Equus.
2) Evolution went at various rates, sometimes fast, sometimes slow, but eventually got to Equus.
However, your video takes these objections to a straight line path, and makes them sound like the people disagree with horse evolution. That is outright deceptive. If you think this video is not deceiving people, look up what the people it quotes actually believe.
I stopped after I saw that. Any youtube video that resorts to distorted facts is not worth my time (or yours).
I didn't watch the end, but you tell me: Did it conclude how we got all those fossils down there over a stretch of millions of years? When and how does it say the first zebra, modern horse, and donkey came into existence? Or did it just misquote people without making a claim of its own?