come on who could have built a submarine in that era....
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just a bit of context here. The statement is from the book of Ether where the brother of Jared is directed by the Lord to build unpowered submarines, termed barges, to cross the ocean to the promised land. They are capable of maintaining an air supply underwater by opening a hole.
This is decidedly in the realm of mythology as it is physically impossible to open a hole in a submarine while it is submerged and not have it sink.
Just a bit of context here. The statement is from the book of Ether where the brother of Jared is directed by the Lord to build unpowered submarines, termed barges, to cross the ocean to the promised land. They are capable of maintaining an air supply underwater by opening a hole.
This is decidedly in the realm of mythology as it is physically impossible to open a hole in a submarine while it is submerged and not have it sink.
Wow. Completely not what is described. Then again, that is what I have learned to expect from our critics. Arguments that do not actually reflect what we believe.
![]()
SAY WHAAAT??? Where in Esther is that?????
Just a bit of context here. The statement is from the book of Ether where the brother of Jared is directed by the Lord to build unpowered submarines, termed barges, to cross the ocean to the promised land. They are capable of maintaining an air supply underwater by opening a hole.
This is decidedly in the realm of mythology as it is physically impossible to open a hole in a submarine while it is submerged and not have it sink.
Not Esther, but Ether. There is a huge difference between the two.
Wow! You probably consider . . .
I consider it ridiculous that anyone would even attempt to present what I think, or consider, on a topic rather than allowing me to speak for myself. Beyond that, I can state without hesitation that you routinely attempt to pass off views and beliefs as belonging to the LDS that do not reflect our actual views and beliefs. What purpose that supposedly serves, I cannot imagine.
![]()
The Confederate States had some success with submarines in the 1860s; I wonder if technology as it developed had some influence on the book of Mormon?so are you saying the submarines were never built??
how can i direct quote not be true?
do you believe the boats never existed??
The Confederate States had some success with submarines in the 1860s; I wonder if technology as it developed had some influence on the book of Mormon?
I wonder why you call them submarines when it specifically says barges?come on who could have built a submarine in that era....
I wonder why you call them submarines when it specifically says barges?
The description of the barges is not at all of what is actually what we know to be barges - a flat-bottomed boat for carrying freight, typically on canals and rivers, either under its own power or towed by another.
The description is much closer to what is known as a submarine. The vessel described is airtight and intended to be surrounded by water. No barge meets those functional requirements.
Go back and read what it says...The description of the barges is not at all of what is actually what we know to be barges - a flat-bottomed boat for carrying freight, typically on canals and rivers, either under its own power or towed by another.
The description is much closer to what is known as a submarine. The vessel described is airtight and intended to be surrounded by water. No barge meets those functional requirements.
so are you saying the submarines were never built??
how can a direct quote not be true?
do you believe the boats never existed??
Go back and read what it says...
It doesn't fit either "modern" understanding of a barge or a boat. Once again, you guys are guilty of the Fallacy of Presentism.
However it more closely does resemble a barge than a submarine. The fact that it says it was light upon the waters means that you could not even call it a submersible, for it would be impossible for it to remain under water.
Unless it had ballast tanks and propulsion system; however the was no propulsion as was noted in the Book of Mormon, nor was there any mention of ballast tanks either.
It seems you guys are always trying to skew things to fit your sensationalism agenda, by playing lose with the facts... The reality is a lot more boring.
What's funny though is that by wasting all your time making stuff up, you missed the far more unlikely aspect of the story... "The rocks the glowed"
Seems you guys just can't seem to win one.