Are tatoos wrong?

[TasManOfGod]

I am referring to the God who said:
"You shall not...tattoo any marks on you; I am the Lord"

 

[9-iron]

Nor can you argue with God who is the God of the two covenants

Yes, but again, I am only under one covenant. I'm not saying the OT Law is done away with, it is still in effect. However, those that are 'in Christ' are no longer bound or required to obey the OT law.

 

[9-iron]

I am referring to the God who said:
"You shall not...tattoo any marks on you; I am the Lord"

God has said a lot of things. Do you obey everything God commanded in the OT??

 

[I'ddie4him2]

I am referring to the God who said:
"You shall not...tattoo any marks on you; I am the Lord"

So Sorry, He is one and the same. Check and Mate. Again.

 

[I'ddie4him2]

Yes, but again, I am only under one covenant. I'm not saying the OT Law is done away with, it is still in effect. However, those that are 'in Christ' are no longer bound or required to obey the OT law.

Yup. The legalists keep missing that one very important point.

 

[I'ddie4him2]

God has said a lot of things. Do you obey everything God commanded in the OT??

That same question was asked earlier in this thread. Glad you brought it up again.

 

[TasManOfGod]

God has said a lot of things. Do you obey everything God commanded in the OT??

If it has not been dealt with at the Cross (ie sacrifices etc) Yes I do (or at last try to) and I certainly dont advocate that others need not be obedient to God

 

[dignitized]

It's amazing that this thread is still going and not ONCE have you answered the question. You do a great job of avoiding it. There is no use in having this discussion - just let it go I'ddie. They have never & will never respond to your question because they can't. They enjoy demanding others live by their rules & avoiding the questions asked of them. You can claim all you want that you have "holy purpose" for this crusade you are on - but you shoot yourself in the foot each time you avoid a simple question. But....you are good at it.

I can only assume that you are addressing me here . . . so: If you want to start a thread to dicuss keeping the Law, I would be glad to discuss that topic with you in a thread for that topic. HOWEVER, it's a diversionary tactic to keep trying to force me to address some other topic as if it proves that tattoos are suddenly okay in the eyes of God.

 

[dignitized]

It is not that I ever expect a conclusion to be reached.


But the Question I wonder, is, has anyone read what the others have said, or has everyone just blased out what they believe, and then shut their mind to any other responce.

Are Tattoo's a Sin?

Some say Yes, Some say No. Both have great arguments and support for their stance.

So what then are we to say to this question?

It is something to Ponder.

Are we right in our stance regarding this question?

If I say "Yes I am right" do I not need to blind myself to everything that my brothers and sisters have said?

Am I to anounce that I reject them, and their words, even if I read from the Same book, and claim to follow the same teacher?

So, Has it been, 250 responces of "Yes it Is" - "No it's Not"

God Bless
Key.

When you have a disagreement about an issue we should always check and see what GOD has to say on the issue and go from there.

 

[TasManOfGod]

mm that blue font looks familiar

 

[dignitized]

Yes, but again, I am only under one covenant. I'm not saying the OT Law is done away with, it is still in effect. However, those that are 'in Christ' are no longer bound or required to obey the OT law.

IF we are not bound or required to obey the Law then there is no longer anything which can be called a sin. After all, what is a sin but a falling short of the mark which is given in/by the LAW.

 

[dignitized]

God has said a lot of things. Do you obey everything God commanded in the OT??

Does anyone keeping or not keeping everything God commanded make what God commanded any LESS true? Whether or not Taz or I or anyone else do or do not keep ALL the law does not make any individual aspect of the law null and void by our keeping or not keeping it. Is your intent to make the whole argument that since no one keeps all the law, why bother even TRYING!?

 

[dignitized]

mm that blue font looks familiar

yea so do the sentiments.

 

[I'ddie4him2]

yea so do the sentiments.

Look in the mirror. Might see the same thing staring back.

 

[TasManOfGod]

So Sorry, He is one and the same. Check and Mate. Again.

Correct So why disobey Him
Because you are under grace?
Well that really isn't how it works -Ask Jesus

 

[dignitized]

Taz: am I the only to notice that the same person is using MULTIPLE ID's to lend weight to his argument?

 

[I'ddie4him2]

mm that blue font looks familiar

What blue font ?
Check your glasses or maybe clean them.

 

[dignitized]

Look in the mirror. Might see the same thing staring back.

Difference is Iddie is that I only have ONE ID and have never even thought to use multiple ID's to make it seem as if more people support my position. If you can't converse honestly - why do you bother conversing at all?

 

[I'ddie4him2]

Taz: am I the only to notice that the same person is using MULTIPLE ID's to lend weight to his argument?

Anyone notice the same tired argument is being used again ??

 

[dignitized]

I'ddie4him
vbmenu_register("postmenu_20328884", true);
AKA Jarhead4JC, Prince of Id, Matt's Daddy

TheLordsLeatherneck
vbmenu_register("postmenu_20329494", true);
AKA JC's Jarhead, Semper Fi Marines.

You give yourself away.