I will do my best to answer your question.
My belief is Christianity. I would define it as the believing/trusting that Jesus of Nazareth, as testified to through the Gospel, is the Christ, the living embodiment of the Character of God, the True Image of God sent by God. As opposed to the worldly image of god which is a false image of god proposed by Satan. It is these two contrary images of God/god that ultimately defines our terms and our character. Accordingly, this trust in Jesus as the Christ has possessed me of a Spirit that instructs me in righteousness and convicts me of sin according to the standard of
Loving others as I would want to be loved. This is the Truth I reason upon, as opposed to the worldly dog eat dog concept of do it to them before they do it to you.
So when discussing socialism, capitalism, Democracy, Autocracy and the dichotomies they exist in and which we reason upon, I'm not speaking at all about any type of philosophy with u. So if you're thinking that I am, then you're mistaken.
The middle is the middle of two subjective and opposing views where one can objectively see the valid arguments of both sides. I'm stating the
fact that this is why a left/right dichotomy exists to denote an objective view. It's only objective in the middle because this is where terms reverse in denotation and connotation from positive to negative and visa versa. For example a buyer finds a high price to be bad for them, while the seller finds the high price to be good for them. These are two subjective views of a buyer and a seller that create a left/right dichotomy.
In view of this fact, I am pointing out that Satan would use either term Capitalism/Socialism to develop propaganda appealing to either subjective view so as to deceive people, and cause division by working both ends against the middle, which is the objective view. The objective view is where one is able to see how to love others as yourself because only there can you understand both sides of an issue.
I'm speaking about facts and falsehoods associated with the terms socialism and capitalism and I'm pointing out the error of saying that Satan is using the term Socialism to push a one world agenda without making the distinction that Satan is a liar who has no intention of supporting the ideals of socialism. But I believe what you do have right is that the beast will attack capitalism in the world probably portraying it as in servitude to greed. The harlot who rides the beast is called the city where all things are bought and sold and people get rich from trade. The beast attacks the woman.
My concern has been that your op is not projecting any objective view, which will cause you to do to others what you wouldn't want done to you, even though you're thinking that you are doing to others exactly as you would want done to you. Why do I think you're violating the commandment? By speaking of all those who argue for socialism as if they are ruled by Satan and serving Satan's agenda, when in fact they're not.
Respectfully, you open your thread with a logical fallacy comparing the founding Fathers statement of not giving up freedom for security with socialism as if that is what socialism does, when in fact they were moving against an autocracy/aristocracy of kingly rule towards Democracy. The founding fathers were protesting taxation without representation. They wrote the constitution giving the elected congressional representatives the power to tax and spend as they see fit for the common welfare. Finally, the mark of the beast is not Socialism nor Democracy, nor does it preclude capitalism. It's the forced devotion and fealty to a person so as to be able to buy or sell.
