Originally Posted by
chaz345
That's another reason why Psalm's accusations that I'm too into authority and control are, in as polite a word as possible, laughable.
This is an example of failure to listen. Instead of taking what I said at face value, it has been ignored and disregarded, and a caricature of my opinion has been created. I don't know what motivates that? But I sure hope its not your practice with your wife and children...
I said this:
I don't perceive C and C as
"wrapped up headship exercised by power,control and authority"
______________________________________________
But Psalm, you have said it boldly, again and again, on other forums. You have spoken quite specifically into my marriage for sure, maybe a bit less so into chaz. Sure based on JUST the above you are correct. But others may not realize this cage match has been going on awhile here on WWF.
I dont "buy the paradigm" at all. I dont live that way, and more importantly I have never nor do I KNOW anyone who lives that way or has ever done so. Ive asked that question now ion 3 forums, "how many marriages have you EVER known that had a man using scriptural leadership to run rough shod over the wife?"....and the other question "how many sermons have you ever encountered that endorse that kind of submission teaching?" Its crucial.....I have found (other than psalm) a total of ONE person who said they had first hand seen that, and maybe 2 or 3 who have ever seen it preached. Add that to the people I know and the churches Ive attended and the sermons Ive sought online and the blogs and boards Ive read and I am convinced its a scare tactic. Its used to sell an agenda. It would be perfectly fine, if as a testimony, someone broken under this came and told the heartbreaking story, and shared and even mentioned , hey this is very bad so dont let it happen to you.....but Psalm, you CRUSADE literally against MEN. Its that simple really. And I see the effects, not of YOU, but of this thinking, as I read boards and see, especially younger wives 35 and under ranting and raving almost angrily from how they 'aint gonna have NO man runnin them over"....to the ubiquitous and myriad of ways of proclaiming "I am woman hear me roar"...to finally the "Im a liberated woman" (which in my estimation well, if you live in the US, western Europe, NZ, Australia, and a few others thats a DUH! statement)...all this grows from the fear that the world is filled with men who seek to keep women down and have them obediently serving us.
It gets more complicated and becomes a no win situation as men simultaneously get told, when we express concenrs of disapproval of things to stop complaining and MAN UP! HUH?! If we "man up" isnt that what the other fear is all about...that we manned up TOO MUCH? Or the other thing where the ladies complain "he's not being a spiritual leader"....OK, Im not sure you really want a spiritual leader, as much as a spiritual task master, ticking of a pre-approved (by wife) schedule and list of things to do that are "spiritual habits"....but dont do it TOO much, or its LEADING, dont do it too little or you ARE NOT leading....sheesh.
This fear is spread through this created image of men as bullies. It doesnt really help that , as we saw elsewhere, in child development studies they even teach the tendency of the boys to anger and physicality and roughness, you know, the opposite of sugar and spice?
Im sorry, my sons are NOT innately inferior. They are not less nuanced of communicators, they are not emotionally lacking, they are not learning disabled, they are not uncontrolled sexual beings, nor predators, they are not liars and potential cheaters by nature, they are not selfish and neglectful of others any more than any HUMAN. I'll tell you what they are...at least the one old enough to see and have an opinion...they are mightily confused at the world and what their REAL role is. The whole thing is mixed signals. They dont want to upset people, they dont want to have to "man up" just to be equals! They just want to be left alone, to be Godly males. And to not be sold that that is a liability.