- Apr 5, 2003
- 6,719
- 469
- 48
- Faith
- Calvinist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Cary.Melvin said:But from the Calvinist point of view (if I am correct), A person that is predestined to salvation would not die in infancy or be born severely mentally disabled, because that would prevent them from having a faith in Jesus, which you need for salvation.
Not true. Infants and these disabled are not able to outwardly express the disposition of their hearts (by outwardly express I include the normal faculty of the will which they do not at that point possess), but that does not change their covenantal position.
Keep in mind that they are condemnable in the first place on the basis of their covenantal representation in Adam. Man's sinfulness, as manifest normally in the faculty of the will and the outward actions of the individual, proceeds from a heart that is from the very beginning full of evil. We are not sinners because we sin, but rather we sin because we are sinners. In regenerating these people He is replacing their heart of stone with a heart of flesh.
If a Calvinist can positively discern, based on ones faith as evidence, that they are predestined to salvation, wouldn't it follow that if God created someone who was unable to have faith in Jesus, they would be predestined to damnation?
Now though we are talking about subjective vs objective evidence. The only person whose election you or I can have any real assurance of is our own. While we can see the present outward state of others, we cannot see their heart, so we do not know if the works which they perform are born of something other than a regenerate, and more importantly in this case we do not know if the perceived lack of such works is indicative of a lack of a regenerate heart.
Upvote
0