Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
. . . I would tell you that there is a difference between being converted toChrist and being converted to your church.
Peace
...I agree that being converted to Christ isn't being converted to any physical church, building or organization. It is to be converted to the Spiritual Body of Christ. A change that Christ makes inside of us. I don't agree with your idea of Eucharist though.
neither do I , but I am done aruging about it and being told that the only way to do it 'right' is the catholic way. Sorry..that don't cut it. Not what Church is about...but anyway....have at it.
I 100 percent agree.Jesus Is the way the truth and the life and the only way to get to God
so with 2 churches claiming the same thing....which one is right? WHY can't any one answer that.But there has to be one "right" way to teach the and interpret the gospel. That's simple logic. And if there is one right way. Perhaps that right way is the way practiced by the church that has been around and taught that gospel since the time of the Apostles.
may be true, but I disagree it is the catholic denomination...sorry...but that is my opinion.But there has to be one "right" way to teach the and interpret the gospel. That's simple logic. And if there is one right way. Perhaps that right way is the way practiced by the church that has been around and taught that gospel since the time of the Apostles.
I always got upset when someone mentioned where was my church? It went underground? It disappeared? A few people living with Jesus in their hearts; where did they meet? How did anyone find the church? How did they keep some from changing the gospel and then moving away and carrying that error? Was it like a smorgasborg of different beliefs, but the same church?But there has to be one "right" way to teach the and interpret the gospel. That's simple logic. And if there is one right way. Perhaps that right way is the way practiced by the church that has been around and taught that gospel since the time of the Apostles.
But there has to be one "right" way to teach the and interpret the gospel. That's simple logic. And if there is one right way. Perhaps that right way is the way practiced by the church that has been around and taught that gospel since the time of the Apostles.
Jesus Is the way the truth and the life and the only way to get to God
In your opinionI agree with Renee. Christ is the "right" way. There is a degree of error in every denomination. Catholicism and Protestanism. It just happens that I think there is less error in Protestanism... and much error in Catholicism.
I agree with Renee. Christ is the "right" way. There is a degree of error in every denomination. Catholicism and Protestanism. It just happens that I think there is less error in Protestanism... and much error in Catholicism.
I agree that if we don't get into Gods word we can be lead astray. Praise God for His written word.I agree with that.
Medjugorje. 1984
Fatima. 1917
Loudes. 1858
Guadalupe. 1531
Where will "Mary" appear next?
What/who determines if these apparitions are really Mary?
What criteria should be used?
What if "Mary" told you that your belief in XYZ was wrong?
Well when we see appearances in the bible they are either Angels or they are the Lord. Never do we see where God sends a human that has passed on to come and talk to His people. The only ones we saw was when Jesus was speaking with Moses and Elijah. And this was the Lord that was speaking to them. They were speaking not to Gods people but to God.yes back to the topic at hand, no one has put forth anything that makes these visions seem demonic. As far as I can tell these are supernatural visios of Our Lady, Mary the Mother of God.
People point out "how will visions of Mary bring faith in Christ?" well if you are an atheist and you see this you will really have to rethink atheism, or pagan, this would mess up the pagan worldview too.
Just like with living people God uses others to spread His word. In the Bible He uses Angels, now He choses to use those who rest in Him. I do not see what the big problem is, we have to be careful about what visions we trust, test it acording to scripture, but you all just seem to be assuming they are evil because it is the Blessed Virgin who is apearing to people
Wow, for once I am in agreement with IAA, there is not a scriptural president for God sending His Saints who have passed on to speak to His people.
Well when we see appearances in the bible they are either Angels or they are the Lord. Never do we see where God sends a human that has passed on to come and talk to His people. The only ones we saw was when Jesus was speaking with Moses and Elijah. And this was the Lord that was speaking to them. They were speaking not to Gods people but to God.
so with 2 churches claiming the same thing....which one is right? WHY can't any one answer that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?