GoldenBoy89
We're Still Here
- Sep 25, 2012
- 26,202
- 28,898
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Humanist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
That's sounds like you just made that up. What law are you talking about?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's sounds like you just made that up. What law are you talking about?The "new one" invented was the one that says it is now illegal in Arizona to uphold the law passed by congress regarding immigration into the United States.
True. And so also Arpaio -- the problem is "the left does not"
The Sheriff was enforcing the Law passed by congress. That point does not change.
I love this quote from the OP
"In fact, the United States Department of Justice admitted before trial that it is “unaware of facts” that would support “that Defendant and other MCSO officers detained plaintiffs on the basis of race."
Many/most American citizens (even voters) believe that taking the Sheriff's Oath of Office means that the Sheriff is sworn by an oath - to uphold the Law. To carry out orders "I can lawfully execute" as stated in that oath.
Presumably Arpaio took such an oath of office.
Many have argued that a Sheriff that is condemned because he chooses to uphold the laws in America - violates Constitutional intent and the written law of the land.
A pardon for someone who chose the LAW over leftism is what is being discussed.
==== as opposed to pardon members of domestic terrorist groups like FALN
Arpaio wasn't even state law enforcement - he was local municipal, specifically Maricopa County. His jurisdiction was limited.What law? the new one?? Is there a law that requires that state law enforcement ignore federal law???
Remember - emotion does not change fact.
Here is "another" example of federal law --
"Aircraft and Motor Vehicle Crimes – Aircraft and motor vehicle crimes include destruction of the vehicles and operating these vehicles under impairment. Threats, drive by shootings, or interference with air traffic signals are included under this heading."
Are you "certain" that you want to jump off the leftist cliff of demanding that state law enforcement IGNORE federal crimes??? or is "just for certain federal crimes" that you want state law enforcement to ignore the law???
Stop with facts. It's so annoying.Arpaio wasn't even state law enforcement - he was local municipal, specifically Maricopa County. His jurisdiction was limited.
Well it is emotionalism when you ignore the actual fact posted in the OP as noted above.
Simply making the false accusation is not the same thing as "having a fact" in support of it.
A pardon for someone who chose the LAW over leftism is what is being discussed.
If leftists have this much trouble with someone who voted against Trump - what will they do if an actual pro-Trump Republican shows up??
The "new one" invented was the one that says it is now illegal in Arizona to uphold the law passed by congress regarding immigration into the United States.
Only if we are willing to turn a blind-eye to immigration laws passed by congress and upheld by law enforcement. (which of course some extreme leftist-agendas are perfectly happy to do).
(posted as someone who did not vote for Trump BTW)
You have to turn a blind eye to some of the laws to be perfectly OK with contempt of court regardless.
If you are willing to turn a blind eye to contempt of a federal judge and call yourself "law and order" because the person doing the deed agrees with you then you've probably replaced due process with a dictatorial authoritarian mindset.
Especially without detaining LEGAL US citizens.yeah, the oppressive left is so unhinged trying to Enforce Federal Law. How dare they.
There are ways to Enforce Immigration laws Passed by Congress without Discrimination and treating them like animals.
Just two peas in a pod.Consider the president doing the pardoning.
Accepting a presidential pardon is an admission of guilt -
Arpaio's real crime (and Trump's by extension) is the belief that people of authority can pick and choose which legally instituted orders they will follow and those they will flout.
Good thing the judge did not do that.I judge that says "I make it illegal for you too uphold your oath of office where you swear to uphold and defend the Laws of the land" -- puts a undue burden on Law enforcement.... obviously.
Good thing the judge did not do that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?