I'm so sick of the crap service at JFK. As much as possible, I try to route through LaGuardia. Which is not a whole lot better but a little. At least they've never given me enhanced security screening for having a 1,200 page book in my luggage (which is about what the Bible tends to be).
It didn’t use to be as bad as it is now. In the 2000s I enjoyed JFK, whereas LaGuardia was known as an anthill. But now, airline service in general is worse, because of mergers being permitted to happen that should have been blocked. The Big Six should not have been allowed to consolidate. In the case of US Airways merging with America West, US Airways probably would have gone out of business otherwise since their finances had become critical during their second chapter 11 bankruptcy, and is also likely that TWA would not have survived the post 9/11 downturn had it remained independent, but in the case of TWA, Carl Icahn literally killed it by leaving it with a large debt to him, and then after a second bankruptcy, agreeing to restructure that debt so that he could purchase TWA tickets for any flights connecting through their main hub in St. Louis at 45% off. This, combined with the crash of flight 800 and the cost of modernizing the aging fleet, doomed the airline. Which is a great tragedy, on the same scale as the loss of Pan Am. The failure of Eastern and Braniff were also tragic, but not on the same level. But even after the Big Six consolidated to the Big Three, other mergers have happened, like the Virgin America-Alaska Airlines merger, which have reduced consumer choice and competition. It seems quite possible Spirit could either collapse altogether or be forced into a merger due to their current chapter 11 bankruptcy. There was also the particularly egregious case where Frontier purchased Midwest, a much loved carrier renowned for their excellent service, and almost literally shut it down completely, by laying off most of the employees and closing the Milwaukee hub (which provided a useful alternative to O’Hare with its chronic runway congestion and delays for those in the northern suburbs of Chicagoland - it would have been even better had the interurban trains of the Chicago and North Shore like the famed Electroliner streamliners that served the Loop in Chicago and travelled from the Loop up what are now the Red Line and Purple Line and then on their own trackage to Milwaukee not been discontinued in the 1950s (there also used to be electric interurbans to Aurora and Elgin that terminated on the loop).
I don’t normally travel with a print copy of the Bible, since it is physically painful for me to read printed books, and I have the versions I like on my iPad, however, the Gideons, who I like, do distribute the KJV, which I also like, albeit unfortunately without the deuterocanonical books (but then again finding a complete KJV that has all of the books King James and the translators intended it to have is extremely difficult; I’ve never seen one in print although you might know where to get one, since the traditional Anglican liturgy reads from those books, albeit referred to in those churches that still adhere to the 39 Articles as apocrypha, and in those churches my understanding is they are read for moral edification but not as sources of doctrine. However in the Episcopal Church and in the Continuing Anglican churches, I would be interested to know if there exists more flexibility in the use of the deuterocanon. I would really like to have a printed KJV in my possession that had the “Apocrypha” present - the Orthodox Study Bible uses the NKJV testament together with an original translation of the Septugaint.
Since I really love the Septuagint and my church uses it preferentially, I like to take the 18th century Lancelot Brenton Septuagint, the Jordanville Psalter (which is the Coverdale Psalter modified to have the same versification and other corrections so it matches the Septuagint Psalter, which is also found in the Challoner Douai-Rheims), and the KJV as the New Testament.
Of course the Masoretic text has value to me also; I like many find Psalm 23 in the KJV to be incredibly beautiful, perhaps moreso than the Septuagint version or the Coverdale version, and also Psalms 1:12 in the MT-based BIbles like the KJV perserves a Christological reference absent from the Septuagint (usually the reverse is true, but there are cases where the MT has the more Christological reading, which in my opinion proves false the anti-Semitic conspiracy theory that the Jews edited the Masoretic Text to remove Christological lessons; also the Masoretic text is very similar to the Vulgate which was also translated directly from Hebrew and Aramaic texts. And it turns out from the Dead Sea Scrolls both versions, and also the Ethiopian BIble, have Hebrew attestation. I would love to see, for my own use at least, a Bible that represented a fusion of the MT and LXX according to those readings which most align with Christian doctrine..