Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes it is.
I never said he was the antichrist and he is an heir to David's throne and his father was considered a god.
Any revelation from God that is past it's due date is like yesterdays manna... and that has maggots in it.Oh? Let's talk about our choice of words then, shall we?
You have, at present, given ZERO justification for citing the specific works for any other Christians, books or live ministries or whatever, as categorizable as old, passe, antiquated "maggoty manna." You've jumped the gun!
You win.And you know what happens in a race when you jump the gun?
"The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea"... available on YouTube as well.Ok. And where is your support or evidence for this? Articles? Books? What?
You wanted me to listen to you. Here I am-----listening.
The book is The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea by Tim Cohen. And that is where you are getting the notion that Prince Charles is possibly the Antichrist.Yes it is.
I never said he was the antichrist and he is an heir to David's throne and his father was considered a god.
What is the functional role difference in being the Antichrist and being the beast king of Revelation 13 who rules the world for 42 months '"The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea"... available on YouTube as well.
What do you want to know?
Ask questions.
"The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea"... available on YouTube as well.
What do you want to know?
Ask questions.
I did not say that the Antichrist was this person. And it is King Charles.The book is The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea by Tim Cohen. And that is where you are getting the notion that Prince Charles is possibly the Antichrist.
He is a descendant of David. I see nothing that says AC must be a Jew. King Charles could be declared a ruler in Israel by a secular nation of Israel.The Antichrist person has to be a Jew. The Antichrist person cannot be Prince Charles..
You are reading a book by Tim Cohen. Cohen is a Jewish name, so Tim Cohen is likely a Jew. Are you aware that other Jews (who are Christians), noted end times authors, Joel Rosenberg, Joel Richardson, don't believe that the Antichrist will be a Jew. Why? Because they themselves are Jews and cannot fathom such a thing as one of their own being the Antichrist.He is a descendant of David. I see nothing that says AC must be a Jew. King Charles could be declared a ruler in Israel by a secular nation of Israel.
Wrong again.You are reading a book by Tim Cohen.
Where does Revelation say the AC is king?Cohen is a Jewish name, so Tim Cohen is likely a Jew. Are you aware that other Jews (who are Christians), noted end times authors, Joel Rosenberg, Joel Richardson, don't believe that the Antichrist will be a Jew. Why? Because they themselves are Jews and cannot fathom such a thing as one of their own being the Antichrist.
The Antichrist has to be a Jew in order for the Jews to accept him as their King of Israel messiah.
You need to educate yourself about what the Jews (Judaism) believe regarding their coming messiah. Try the Judaism 101 site, about things, the mashiach.Where does Revelation say the AC is king?
So if he is just a powerful person in the region why can he not be a Gentile?
I don't see that in Revelation at all.The person as the beast-king in Revelation 13 will no longer be the Antichrist at that time. Antichrist and Beast-king are two different function roles. One is as the King of Israel. The other is as dictator of the end times Roman Empire, the EU.
No that also does not track... nothing in Rev 6 has any hint of an AC.The Antichrist is in Revelation 6:2, as the rider on the White Horse, given a crown. The crown given is that he will be anointed the King of Israel, coming in his own name. That is what makes the person the Antichrist. Being anointed by the false prophet as the King of Israel will be the swearing in ceremony of the person.
Hmmm... I don't see the King part in Revelation.Which, as the newly crowned King of Israel, it will be incumbent of him to confirm the Mt Sinai covenant for 7 years, as is in Daniel 9:27, And so with that, the 7 years begin. The same 7 years in Ezekiel 39:9-10 following the Gog/Magog event.
It doesn't. That the whole point. As the beast king, he will no longer be the King of Israel (the Antichrist), because half way through the 7 years, he goes into the temple, sits, claiming to have achieved God-hood. When he does that, the Jews will reject him from continuing as their King of Israel.I don't see that in Revelation at all.
What verse in Rev 13 says the Beast is King of Israel?
Sorry... you contradict yourself.It doesn't. That the whole point. He will no long be the King of Israel (the Antichrist), because half way through the 7 years, he goes into the temple, sits, claiming to have achieved God-hood. When he does that, the Jews will reject him from continuing as their King of Israel.
Give the Revelation references. Thanks.In retaliation, the person will persecute the Jews for the remainder of the 7 years.
Again, go to post #164 and study that graphic I made of the different functional roles the person goes through on the way to his destruction.
Given a crown in Revelation 6:2 is that he is made a king. That he is riding a white horse indicates him being a messiah figure.I don't see that in Revelation at all.
What verse in Rev 13 says the Beast is King of Israel?
No that also does not track... nothing in Rev 6 has any hint of an AC.
Hmmm... I don't see the King part in Revelation.
That is your interpretation and you know how I feel about interpreting Revelation.Given a crown in Revelation 6:2 is that he is made a king. That he is riding a white horse indicates him being a messiah figure.
No, I didn't. You only quoted part of what I typed.Sorry... you contradict yourself.
"Antichrist and Beast-king are two different function roles. One is as the King of Israel."
Please try to be consistent.
You said the AC was not the King of Israel.No, I didn't. You only quoted part of what I typed.
Antichrist - King of Israel coming in his own name, one role
Beast-King - Dictator of the Eu, end times Roman Empire, another role.
I will break the 7 years down for you with only those two functional roles.
First half of the 7 years, the person is the Antichrist, King of Israel coming in his own name.
Second half of the 7 years, the person is the Beast King, dictator of the EU, no longer the King of Israel
No, I never wrote that the Antichrist was not going to be the King of Israel. You eyes must be playing tricks on you.You said the AC was not the King of Israel.
Now you say he is.
But where exactly in Revelation does the AC become KING OF ISRAEL?
Chapter and verse..... please.
Post #278.No, I never wrote that the Antichrist was not going to be the King of Israel. You eyes must be playing tricks on you.
No but the idea. Only the most simple fall back on the "the word is not there so the idea is not there" defense.Are you looking for the term "Antichrist" in Revelation? Everyone knows that the term "Antichrist" is not in Revelation.
Where is this???????The rider on the white horse given a crown in Revelation 6:2 is the Antichrist, albeit the word "Antichrist" does not appear in the text.
This is what I wrote in Post #278...Post #278.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?