That's because slavery isn't as bad as it's deemed today. Liberal guilt has simply made it synonymous to a holocaust.
I'm expecting a rush to post this to the "Fundies Say the Darndest Things" website. It's gold...
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's because slavery isn't as bad as it's deemed today. Liberal guilt has simply made it synonymous to a holocaust.
Oh man, it's like holiday meals with extended family.That's because slavery isn't as bad as it's deemed today. Liberal guilt has simply made it synonymous to a holocaust.
Well. The very first thing I notice is that the title "When the Bride Is a Groom" indicates that this is from the viewpoint of males and that it's only acknowledging gay males.
That's because slavery isn't as bad as it's deemed today.
So that makes slavery OK?
Now that I'm over my initial shock, I'll move on to the next part of your post. I have no idea how you can think this. It took the South decades to figure out how to function economically without slavery. They weren't ready for it. No one thought they were ready for it. They lost all of their free labor practically overnight. They were forced to change, and rightly so, but it was not a natural progression that occurred when the demand for slaves dropped, or whatever you're thinking.There's never been a time in history where slavery was abolished for moral reasons, it's always been straight out of necessity, or in America's case, industrial progress.
What about children need a mum and dad as the best possible situation for them to grow up happy and well balanced.
Even if research showed this (the results vary), this isn't a reason to ban same-sex marriage. No one is held to these standards. Widows and widowers don't lose their children. Unwed mothers aren't required to give up the baby. Some single people are allowed to adopt. Conversely, opposite-sex couples are allowed to marry even if they have no plans to include children in their household.What about children need a mum and dad as the best possible situation for them to grow up happy and well balanced.
Even if research showed this (the results vary), this isn't a reason to ban same-sex marriage. No one is held to these standards. Widows and widowers don't lose their children. Unwed mothers aren't required to give up the baby. Some single people are allowed to adopt. Conversely, opposite-sex couples are allowed to marry even if they have no plans to include children in their household.
Not denying any of that. I'm just saying that research shows that a child needs both a mother and father in their lives in a happy marriage to be in the best possible situation for life.Even if research showed this (the results vary), this isn't a reason to ban same-sex marriage. No one is held to these standards. Widows and widowers don't lose their children. Unwed mothers aren't required to give up the baby. Some single people are allowed to adopt. Conversely, opposite-sex couples are allowed to marry even if they have no plans to include children in their household.
Not denying any of that. I'm just saying that research shows that a child needs both a mother and father in their lives in a happy marriage to be in the best possible situation for life.
Its only controversial if you make it that way. I dont look at it that way. I,m only relaying what is said about the optimum setup that would be best for a child by the experts. They are just stats and they are not having a go at anyone. But its not good to not acknowledge what is the best thing to do either. If you dont acknowledge things then you can address things either.I think it depends who does the research. Psychological things shouldn't really be researched at all on controversial topics imo, it only serves to undermine credibility of all sort of research.