You're confusing the matter. It is not logically impossible, it is scientifically improbable. In order to deny its possibility you would have to prove each and every law your above listed 'examples' breaks to be true beyond any doubt whatsoever. All I need to do in that case is cite the Bible and I have enough doubt to disprove your law.
Then prove that God cannot be all three if it's 'logically impossible'. Prove that the creator of the universe, who established the scientific probabilities you list as broken and breaks them quite regularly, cannot do what your mind cannot comprehend possible. You need all the evidence in the world if you're going to start talking about logical impossibilities without understanding what they are.
Well, then. To the first paragraph, I think it should be noted that the argument was that the Bible is illogical, and LOGICALLY the things I mentioned do not, and can not happen. Can you honestly tell me that you can logically deduce that Biblical findings are valid and even slightly likely? Logic plays absolutely NO part in the Bible. Are you saying that it's merely improbable, but still possible, that a man was swallowed by a giant fish and did not die? Or any of the other things listed? And citing the Bible as evidence that the Bible is true is ridiculous. That's the same as claiming that I'm right because I said so. The Bible claims to be the perfect, inerrant word of God, and it's been shown that the Bible is NOT perfect, has very many contradictions, and that as far as science is concerned, it has been wrong many times over. This is fact, not assumption.
And secondly, while it may be possible that there is a good who is either omniscient, omnipotent or benevolent... it is impossible for him to be all three. God can not love everyone, but know in advance that they will commit unspeakable sins and ALLOW them to do so and spend eternity in hell. That is by no means a ''loving'' act. If he
knows who will be evil before they are even born, but allows them to be born so that they may burn eternally, that is a very cruel act. So, in order to love mankind, God must not be all knowing, or not all powerful. Free will only explains so much. Yes, God gave us free will, but he knows what we will do with that free will. He knows the people that will be hurt by it and allows it. He sends his beloved humans to earth to suffer, in order to determine who is good enough to join him in heaven. But he already KNOWS. So then, he justs wants us to suffer for fun? And how about Jesus? "For God so loved the world he gave his only begotten son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." If God is all powerful, can you explain to me why he can't forgive us of our sins without sending his son to earth to die a horrible death? And why this would even be such a sacrifice if he KNOWS his son will be resurrected and will join him in heaven again? God didn't need to love us to do this, he never truly gave up his son. And Jesus didn't have to love us either, seeing as he knew he'd be coming back.
And what about the fact that a supernatural being would have no reason to create earth at all, if he knows already exactly how everything would turn out? Why would such a being bother? And for that matter, where did said being come from? People claim that God has no beginning or end, he just is. But they also claim that earth and humans had to come from somewhere, and that's why we need God. But why on earth is it "smarter" to believe that an all powerful being capable of creating the universe came from nothing, but the universe couldn't have done so? It's like adding another step to an already complicated question.
Perhaps it is claimed that God does things we can not comprehend because by feeling inferior, we won't ask questions. Because by hearing these impossible standards, we can not combat them.
