There are tons of Books, Magazine articles and Research papers showing why it is a waste of time and the "Experts"(as you call them) know that. Why should they waste their time trying to convince people that refuse to listen?
Refuse to listen or we are wasting our time listening?
I could have chosen others.
It was once said of economists, that if there are 10 economists they have 11 opinions.
They have nothing on epidemiologists!
Take the “ expert” who said that if Sweden continued the “ madness” of not locking down they would have 50000 deaths minimum and probably more. How did that work out??
Same “expert” formed U.K. lockdown policy! His predictions have been woeful on all past epidemics. The question is why we listened!
If we have discovered three things about epidemiologists
(1) they don’t agree with each other by a wide margin
(2) they demand we listen to their ever changing narrative
The kicker - always look for the hidden motive:
(3) they all get full pay to stay at home however badly they do, so why wouldn’t they vote to lockdown?
The editor of the main U.K. doctors journal even disagrees with himself. Does he bother read what he wrote the previous month? Doesn’t he love talking down to people!
I’m a postgrad physicist. I am always conscious of what I don’t know.
as someone who did a lot of math modelling in a defence context I was only to happy to air reservations on the model. That is the responsible thing, because lives could be lost if it was wrong.
These “ experts” should take the same view.
In this forum context evolutionary scientists should admit they don’t have a clue about how the minimum cell developed: if they did they would sketch an intermediate simpler cell. They can’t. It’s all speculation. Stop telling us it is a fact.
If an environmental scientist is guessing on thin data, he should say so.