Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That does it. Based on the absolute truth taught in this book I am no longer a heliocentric believer. Wow what was I thinking.
Of course you would. Never mind ordering a book that might actually teach you something.Kings Dethroned: A History of the Evolution of Astronomy from the Time of the Roman Empire up to the present day. Thanks - I will order this book off eBay as it's unavailable on Amazon.
It's a different word.So I spelled it wrong, what's your problem ?
And you've been told your info is wrong.
You say itYou obviously didn't bother to follow the links. By the time the laser reaches the moons surface it is no longer a narrow beam but is striking a large area of the moon's curved surface, so what is sent as a brief pulse of light gets reflected back as a longer pulse, as some of light has travelled further and takes a bit longer to return. Thus it does not result in high accuracy. With the retroreflectors they are able to get a strong reflection from a very small area that is distinct from the laser light reflected off the moon's surface, without the blurred time interval, greatly increasing the accuracy of their measurements.
Without the reflectors they get a noisy, time blurred reflection from a broad area of the moons surface. With the reflectors they get a clear, sharp reflection from a precise location on the moon's surface.
Well Prodromos I certainly did follow the links. You write ( by the time the laser reaches the moons surface it is no longer a narrow beam but is now striking a large area of the moons curved surface, so what is sent as a brief pulse of light gets reflected back as a longer pulse as some of light has traveled further and takes a longer to return. ) I would say to that every laser bounce from the observatory to the moon is back in well under 10 seconds including the alleged reflectors there is no little extra time. You then say ( thus it does not result in high accuracy from a precise location) ) that is what tell us. But Prodromos the issue is could the astronauts have survived the Van Ellen’s belt to even set foot on the moon to set up the reflectors when considering that no astronaut has gone through the Ven Ellen’s belt in 50 years to further exploration and we now have advanced 5 times in technology to do so.You obviously didn't bother to follow the links. By the time the laser reaches the moons surface it is no longer a narrow beam but is striking a large area of the moon's curved surface, so what is sent as a brief pulse of light gets reflected back as a longer pulse, as some of light has travelled further and takes a bit longer to return. Thus it does not result in high accuracy. With the retroreflectors they are able to get a strong reflection from a very small area that is distinct from the laser light reflected off the moon's surface, without the blurred time interval, greatly increasing the accuracy of their measurements.
Without the reflectors they get a noisy, time blurred reflection from a broad area of the moons surface. With the reflectors they get a clear, sharp reflection from a precise location on the moon's surface.
Of course you would. Never mind ordering a book that might actually teach you something.
To your demise.I've just now ordered it.
You should have ordered this one.I've just now ordered it.
Kings Dethroned: A History of the Evolution of Astronomy from the Time of the Roman Empire up to the present day. Thanks - I will order this book off eBay as it's unavailable on Amazon.
Seeing as we have sent multiple probes to the moon, to Venus, Mars and other planets with incredible accuracy, I'm pretty confident that Gerrard Hickson is not correct in his assessment.The astronomy system is heavily deceptive Amazon.com
It isn't an issue. I've been exposed to a lot more radiation with all the x-rays and scans I've had done than the astronauts were in those few hours. I am now in my 60's and still in pretty decent health. No cancers or extra appendages growing anywhere.But Prodromos the issue is could the astronauts have survived the Van Ellen’s belt to even set foot on the moon to set up the reflectors when considering that no astronaut has gone through the Ven Ellen’s belt in 50 years to further exploration and we now have advanced 5 times in technology to do so.
Well Hentenza as me has to remind you. Even with less radiation and the quickest route you’re still going into a sea of radiation with the Van Ellen belt . And metal is something that sends radiation berserk . And they even have certian metal makeups within their space suit including their space helmet. Your stats say from the unmanned space craft only 13 rads others would disagree. Other scientists say anywhere from 600 rads to 1100 rads there also be the solar flares. You might like to watch on U tube . ( Radiation reloaded the complete series ) it goes into some on the future Artemis future flights you mentioned and there also be a series of short filme called ( radioactive anomaly .)The trajectory is never “the long way”. it does take less than an hour to cross it since the e typical velocity of the aircraft is over 25000 mph.
The total amount of rads that the astronauts get is 13 which is well within the 300 rads maximum. BTW- everything is studied before crewed spacecraft are sent anywhere. The early uncrewed Apollo missions were test missions where all sorts of testing equipment were in use. Before a crewed mission passed through the belt NASA knew exactly what the effects on the astronauts would be. The testing determined the trajectory, velocity, and amount of shielding needed to cross the belt safely.
The telemetry tapes were lost but because of the nature of computing during those days. But that is really inconsequential because the telemetry, being unencrypted, was followed internationally by a plethora of scientists and amateurs.
Secondly, my father in law actually worked on the Apollo program. I have his testimony, and the testimony of his friends that worked with him. I also have a tremendous amount of memorabilia from the missions. I am also an engineer that worked for Boeing briefly in the 80’s and worked on some of the shuttle components. Among the benefits of the Apollo program was the advance real time studies of components and materials that were used in space.
Thirdly, there is a tremendous amount of evidence that people actually landed on the moon. The lunar lander landing stages for the 6 missions that landed on the moon are still there as well as the flags that each mission planted. In fact, the flag from Apollo 11 fell because they put it too close to the ascend stage and got knocked down. The rest of the missions put it further away so they stand to this day.
Fourthly, the reflectors left on the lunar surface by three of the missions are still in use today. How did they get there if we did not land on the moon?
Of course there is also the 842 pounds of moon rocks brought back by the 6 missions collectively.
Look, faking the telemetry alone would have been impossible. The comprehensive multiple streams of data using unique frequencies alone would have been impossible to replicate from a studio on earth to make it appear that it was coming from the moon. They would have to factor the 1.2 second lag in communication because of the distance. Not only that but they would need to fake it in such a way that it reached the global network of receivers, California, Australia, and Spain among many, at the same time and with the same lag. We can’t even do that now with our advanced technologies. Also if the frequency was coming from earth Russia would have exposed it immediately.
So the evidence that there was no deception is irrefutable and absolute. Twelve men actually landed on the moon. The next stage of the Artemis program will launch April 2026 and will bring a crew of astronauts to the moon and back. You can watch that one yourself when it happens.
Ok Prodromos we make you a prime candidate for the next flight on the Artemis : )It isn't an issue. I've been exposed to a lot more radiation with all the x-rays and scans I've had done than the astronauts were in those few hours. I am now in my 60's and still in pretty decent health. No cancers or extra appendages growing anywhere.
Well, none of the astronauts that went to the moon developed illnesses consistent with radiation exposure nor any one of them suffered an early death because of it. The end total radiation that were on their skin ranged from .18 to 1.14 rads which is no different than on earth. The shielding, speed, and trajectory worked flawlessly. If the “other” scientist that you spoke off were correct then the astronauts would have developed cancers and other radiation related illnesses. So the proof is the fact that none of them developed radiation exposure illnesses.Well Hentenza as me has to remind you. Even with less radiation and the quickest route you’re still going into a sea of radiation with the Van Ellen belt . And metal is something that sends radiation berserk . And they even have certian metal makeups within their space suit including their space helmet. Your stats say from the unmanned space craft only 13 rads others would disagree. Other scientists say anywhere from 600 rads to 1100 rads there also be the solar flares. You might like to watch on U tube . ( Radiation reloaded the complete series ) it goes into some on the future Artemis future flights you mentioned and there also be a series of short filmed called ( radioactive anomaly .) View attachment 371586 As to the moon rocks that would depend if we ever made to the moon. Would you believe they claim the moon rocks to be over 4 billion years .old. And considering that creation only goes back some 7000 yrs. I do wonder if these people have ever counted 4 billion years ?
Nonsense. The scientific method leads to repeatable and verifiable data. Conspiracy theories on the other hand leads to absurdity._Science claims are faith base, people who believe what science states (like going to the moon, etc..). These claims are believed by a person having faith in people, institutions and Governments and what they have claimed to have done or doing.
A sexton? How would a bell-ringer/grave-digger help calculate it?Using a sexton they could calculate this figure.
If they had some of the grape juice (wine) that were made from water, how old would they find it to be ? yet it did not exist before the slaves obeyed Jesus and filled the jugs with water.The overwhelming scientific evidence supports the view that the Earth is billions of years old, a belief shared by astronauts and scientists alike. This understanding is crucial for comprehending Earth's history, geological processes, and the evolution of life.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?