Another look at the moon landing.

[Kathleen30]

-

​

I personally do not believe in the van allen radiation belt. To do so, a person whould have to also believe there is an outer space where the sun, moon and stars are thousand's/ millions miles/light years away from a globe earth moving in an outer space.

So, there are no van allen radiation belts to get through to begin with.

Taylor Throughput our histories there has always been different distances given to our sun some much shorter distance and some much longer distance .. now I think bed time . Good nite

 

[Kathleen30]

There is absolutely no evidence of a mass (in the millions) deception. There is no testimony under oath that NASA faked the lunar landings. The proof though is absolute that they indeed landed in the moon. The telemetry signal from the Apollo missions was not encrypted so thousands of scientists and amateurs alike were tracking the mission Including the Russians. We are talking about a global network of independent observers. All of these track a signal coming from the moon not a signal coming from earth. This would have been easy to determine.

Secondly, crossing the Van Allen Belt takes 53 minutes not 6 hours. The Apollo astronauts crossed it at ballistic speeds, with shielding, and at the weaker, upper portion. All crewed missions from Apollo 8 to Apollo 17 crossed the Van Allen belt.

They crossed it at ballistic speeds : ) Hentenza good nite

 

[Hentenza]

Hentenza as to turning your argument into a populum that was never my intention. Just because thousands of people worked on the project doesn’t mean they landed on the moon. Hentenza you say that NASA was never involved with the CIA in black projects. They certainly were It was well known that they did. Actually they were like husband & wife together when it came to that . Hentenza me recommends a book for you to clarify that there be many other books View attachment 371383 And Henrenza thank you for inviting me along with such company as Apple Sky and I think the other invited guest was Taylor Now me starting to feel like a really bad ass in such company. I can feel my butt getting a good smacking already ‍: )

The only relationship with the CIA and intelligence agencies was facilitating the placement of spy satellites in orbit. None of the intelligence agencies were involved in the Mercury and Apollo programs. The National Reconnaissance Office commissioned companies like Lockheed Martin, Perkin-Elmer and the Naval Research Laboratory among others to construct the satellites. NASA then would place the satellites in their pre determined orbits. The National Reconnaissance Office controls the satellites not NASA.

Im glad you accepted my invitation and thanks for posting. But im disappointed that you did not reply to the post that I invited you to, post 3154. Any comments about the Artemis program?

 

[Hentenza]

-

​

I personally do not believe in the van allen radiation belt. To do so, a person whould have to also believe there is an outer space where the sun, moon and stars are thousand's/ millions miles/light years away from a globe earth moving in an outer space.

So, there are no van allen radiation belts to get through to begin with.

Nonsense

 

[Hentenza]

They crossed it at ballistic speeds : ) Hentenza good nite

Yep. About 25000 mph. That qualifies as ballistic. Good night to you too.

 

[Hentenza]

Wow and no one addressed my post about the Artemis mission. My post 3154. Here it is again. I expect those that deny space travel to address the fact that the first mission, Artemis 1, circled the moon. This happened in Nov. of 2022.

@Apple Sky @Kathleen30 @d taylor

Let’s talk about the Artemis program. The program is going to have 3 stages and is designed to once again land people on the moon. Artemis 1 launched on Nov. 2022 and circled the moon. This has already happened and the mission passed low orbit and the firmament.

“NASA successfully launched Artemis 1 at 01:47 a.m. EST (0647 GMT) on November 16, from Launch Complex 39B at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Check out the amazing views of the moon rocket's debut with this image gallery. For a timeline of Artemis 1 achievements and milestones check out our mission updates archive.


NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) rocket took an uncrewed deep space exploration system — the Orion spacecraft — around the moon and back again in an effort to test the Orion module, SLS rocket as well as ground systems at the Kennedy Space Center, laying the foundations for subsequent missions within the Artemis program.”

Artemis 1: The first step in returning astronauts to the moon

Artemis 1 laid the foundations for future lunar exploration and beyond.

www.space.com

Artemis 2 is slated to launch on April 2026 and will be a crewed mission that will circle the moon but not land. This is a crewed test.

Artemis 3 does not yet have a definite launch date but is slated to launch sometime after the middle of 2027. This will be a crewed mission that will land on the moon so people once again will walk on the moon surface.

Now what?

 

[d taylor]

-

​

What this verse is stating is, let there be lights in the sky of the heavens. The verse does not say, let there be lights in the outer space of the heavens

Then God said, “Let there be lights in the firmament (sky) of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days and years;

And another verse states these light are for giving light on the earth. The verse does not say these lights are for giving light to a solar system.

God set them in the sky (raqia) of the heavens to give light on the earth,

 

[Hentenza]

-

​

What this verse is stating is let there be lights in the sky of the heavens. The verse does not say, let there the light in the outer space of the heavens

Then God said, “Let there be lights in the firmament (sky) of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days and years;

And another verse states these light are for giving light on the earth. The verse does not say these lights are for giving light to a solar system.

God set them in the sky (raqia) of the heavens to give light on the earth,

1. God did not dictate the Bible but inspired the writers. The writers wrote from their experience and witness at the time. The night and day is indeed manifested in the sky, what they could see and witness.

2. God created the universe with billions of planets and stars. Paul even states that God’s existence and power is clearly seen in His creation. People could see what was beyong the sky at night as the beauty of the planets and stars are clearly visible.

“For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, that is, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, being understood by what has been made, so that they are without excuse.”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭1‬:‭20‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

Romans 1:20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, that is, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, being understood by what has been made, so that they are withou | New American Standard Bible - NASB

For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, that is, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, being understood by what has been made, so that they are withou

bible.com

So to infuse interpretation error into scripture is at best problematic and at worse lead to nonsense.

 

[Apple Sky]

So to infuse interpretation error into scripture is at best problematic and at worse lead to nonsense.

Theologians interpret the Bible through various methods, including historical-grammatical, canonical, and theological approaches. They examine the text's historical and cultural context, consider how different parts of the Bible relate to each other, and focus on the theological meaning, aiming to understand God's message and its implications for faith and life.

 

[Strong in Him]

Do you know how radiation works anything made of steel attracts radiation like a bee hive it would have been all through the module . You say two hours ? Try 3 hours .

I don't say two hours - the article does.
NASA scientists didn't get their qualifications out of a cornflakes packet - they knew what they were doing and what they were talking about.

That you don't believe them - even the Christians among them - says far more about you than it does about them.

 

[Strong in Him]

Yes do you ? Watch to the end.

Why?
And why would Russia question America's landing on the moon if, according to you, they were both in on the "scam"?

 

[Apple Sky]

And why would Russia question America's landing on the moon if, according to you, they were both in on the "scam"?

Pretense for the public.

 

[Strong in Him]

Pretense for the public.

Why?

What were they trying to con the public about?
Why, in 50+ years, has no one ever said, "we fooled you - hahahahaha?" Would good is a trick if you never show how clever you were to fool them, and how stupid they were to fall for it?
How has the world changed for the better because the mighty USA and Russia became friends, made a plan and fooled everyone else?

 

[Hentenza]

Theologians interpret the Bible through various methods, including historical-grammatical, canonical, and theological approaches. They examine the text's historical and cultural context, consider how different parts of the Bible relate to each other, and focus on the theological meaning, aiming to understand God's message and its implications for faith and life.

Exactly. So what’s your point?

 

[Hentenza]

Pretense for the public.

They fooled everyone I tell ya. Everyone……..