Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The point is, your subjective opinion is no different than anyone else's on the matter.I am. Revelation fits. Hardly any of it even hints at not fitting, certainly no worse than James as far as that goes, and on closer inspection, it is doesn't even hint after all, at not fitting.
Seems strange that one so erudite as yourself would take it upon your own authority to recommend ignoring or discarding Revelation.
So, subjective opinion trumps orthodoxy? Scripture is no longer an anchor and correction of personal thought?The point is, your subjective opinion is no different than anyone else's on the matter.
Until the 1800s the apocrypha were regarded as scripture, so sidestepping that is not going to work out for you with the above argument.So, subjective opinion trumps orthodoxy? Scripture is no longer an anchor and correction of personal thought?
When did Protestantism omit them?Until the 1800s the apocrypha were regarded as scripture, so sidestepping that is not going to work out for you with the above argument.
They’re not in the canon list in the Westminster Confession, nor Luther. However the Ltheran situation isn’t so clear, since there is no official canon, and printed a bibles typically included the DC books. Wikipedia saysWhen did Protestantism omit them?
Thanks. . .most interesting.Incidentally, Luther disputed Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation. Current Lutheran theory considers them and several other books disputed. In principle Lutherans don’t have an official canon, though recently Lutherans have tended to move in the direction of other Protestants, particularly in the more conservative churches. Roughly the same set of NT books were disputed in the early church, though eventually included in the canon. Wikipedia lists them as Epistle of James, the Epistle of Jude, 2 Peter, 2 and 3 John, the Book of Revelation.
While not disputing its status, Calvin didn’t comment on the Rev, and almost never quoted it.
Annihilationism is the belief that rather than going to place of eternal torment, the wicked will be destroyed entirely, both in body and spirit. It is commonly promoted by the Seventh Day Adventist Church, and related denominations.
Most contemporary Christians believe that the wicked will go to hell and suffer for eternity.
What are your thoughts on annihilationism? Is it biblical?
Personally, I am kinda agnostic on the issue. I lean towards the traditional view of hell being a literal place of torment, largely just to be on the safe side, but I do see some compelling arguments for annihilationism.
The Bible clearly teaches annihilationism. The concept of eternal torment has it's roots in Greek philosophy. It's not taught in the Bible. It entered the church early on and has hung on ever since. It's a tool that kept people in line.
How does it achieve keeping people in line? Annihilation is literally a worse fate if that's what you mean.
Early on it was easy for some in the church to use the threat of eternal torment to keep the masses under control.
If you study church history you can see the evidence of it.Easy for who? Who are these "some"? How does it keep people under control? Where is the record of these things and this effect? Controlled to do what?
If you study church history you can see the evidence of it.
That's great, luckily I have been doing just that and so far I don't see it. What period do you think this was happening in, is there some book or record that convinced you in particular? Church history is exceedingly broad and there is a lot of contentious stuff in it, and little things you can overlook, so I probably missed it. Not to mention language barriers for a lot of it.
I agree that it’s not in the OT. But by the time of the NT things had changed. This was a general cultural thing affecting all religions, including Judaism. All developed the concept of punishment after death. There doesn’t seem to have been agreement, even within specific religious communities, exactly who ended up where. There was Jewish thought that everyone eventually stopped being punished, but many people thought there were some exceptions, and for some groups the exceptions grew. The idea that some people never made it out of hell was certainly around in Judaism.The Bible clearly teaches annihilationism. The concept of eternal torment has it's roots in Greek philosophy. It's not taught in the Bible. It entered the church early on and has hung on ever since. It's a tool that kept people in line.
That is a common internet rumor some folks like to spread around but there is no, zero, none evidence to support it. On the other hand.Early on it was easy for some in the church to use the threat of eternal torment to keep the masses under control. The idea of eternal torment stems from the Greek philosophical idea that man has an immortal soul. This idea became incorporated into Christianity. The Bible says that the wicked will be cast into the Lake of Fire. Well, if man has an immortal soul that will never die, it has to be somewhere for eternity, thus eternal torment for the wicked. However, we Scripture shows us that man does not have an immortal soul.
Everything you disagree with is a common internet rumorThat is a common internet rumor some folks like to spread around but there is no, zero, none evidence to support it. On the other hand.
…..According to three Jewish sources; which to date have not been refuted, the Jewish Encyclopedia, Encyclopedia Judaica and the Talmud, quoted below, among the Jews in Israel before and during the time of Jesus there was a belief in a place of everlasting torment of the wicked and they called it both שׁאול sheol and גי־הנם /gehinnom. translated as "hades" and "Gehenna" in the 225 BC LXX and the NT.
…..There were different groups within Judaism; Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes etc. and there were different beliefs about resurrection, hell etc. That there were differing beliefs does not rebut, refute, change or disprove anything in this post.
Jewish Encyclopedia, Gehenna[Note, this is according to the ancient Jews, long before the Christian era, NOT supposed bias of Christian translators. DA]
The place where children were sacrificed to the god Moloch … in the "valley of the son of Hinnom," to the south of Jerusalem (Josh. xv. 8, passim; II Kings xxiii. 10; Jer. ii. 23; vii. 31-32; xix. 6, 13-14). … the valley was deemed to be accursed, and "Gehenna" therefore soon became a figurative equivalent for "hell." Hell, like paradise, was created by God (Sotah 22a);
(I)n general …sinners go to hell immediately after their death. The famous teacher Johanan b. Zakkai wept before his death because he did not know whether he would go to paradise or to hell (Ber. 28b). The pious go to paradise, and sinners to hell(B.M. 83b).When Jesus taught e.g.,
But as regards the heretics, etc., and Jeroboam, Nebat's son, hell shall pass away, but they shall not pass away" (R. H. 17a; comp. Shab. 33b). All that descend into Gehenna shall come up again, with the exception of three classes of men: those who have committed adultery, or shamed their neighbors, or vilified them (B. M. 58b).[/i]
… heretics and the Roman oppressors go to Gehenna, and the same fate awaits the Persians, the oppressors of the Babylonian Jews (Ber. 8b). When Nebuchadnezzar descended into hell, [ שׁאול /Sheol]] all its inhabitants were afraid that he was coming to rule over them (Shab. 149a; comp. Isa. xiv. 9-10). The Book of Enoch [x. 6, xci. 9, etal] also says that it is chiefly the heathen who are to be cast into the fiery pool on the Day of Judgment (x. 6, xci. 9, et al). "The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity" (Judith xvi. 17). The sinners in Gehenna will be filled with pain when God puts back the souls into the dead bodies on the Day of Judgment, according toIsa. xxxiii. 11 (Sanh. 108b).
Link: Jewish Encyclopedia Online
Note, scripture references are highlighted in blue.
= = = = = = = = = =
Encyclopedia Judaica:
Gehinnom (Heb. גֵּי בֶן־הִנֹּם, גֵּי בְנֵי הִנֹּם, גֵּיא בֶן־הִנֹּם, גֵּיא הִנֹּם; Gr. Γέεννα; "Valley of Ben-Hinnom, Valley of [the Son (s) of] Hinnom," Gehenna), a valley south of Jerusalem on one of the borders between the territories of Judah and Benjamin, between the Valley of *Rephaim and *En-Rogel (Josh. 15:8; 18:16). It is identified with Wadi er-Rababi.
…..During the time of the Monarchy, Gehinnom, at a place called Topheth, was the site of a cult which involved the burning of children (II Kings 23:10; Jer. 7:31; 32:35 et al.; ). Jeremiah repeatedly condemned this cult and predicted that on its account Topheth and the Valley of the Son of Hinnom would be called the Valley of the "Slaughter" (Jer. 19:5–6).
In Judaism the name Gehinnom is generally used as an appellation of the place of torment reserved for the wicked after death. The New Testament used the Greek form Gehenna in the same sense.
Gehinnom
= = = = = = = = = =
Talmud -Tractate Rosh Hashanah Chapter 1.
The school of Hillel says: . . . but as for Minim, [followers of Jesus] informers and disbelievers, who deny the Torah, or Resurrection, or separate themselves from the congregation, or who inspire their fellowmen with dread of them, or who sin and cause others to sin, as did Jeroboam the son of Nebat and his followers, they all descend to Gehenna, and are judged there from generation to generation, as it is said [Isa. lxvi. 24]: "And they shall go forth and look upon the carcases of the men who have transgressed against Me; for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched." Even when Gehenna will be destroyed, they will not be consumed, as it is written[Psalms, xlix. 15]: "And their forms wasteth away in the nether world," which the sages comment upon to mean that their forms shall endure even when the grave is no more. Concerning them Hannah says [I Sam. ii. 10]: "The adversaries of the Lord shall be broken to pieces."
Link: Tract Rosh Hashana: Chapter I.
• “Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:” Matthew 25:41…..These teachings tacitly reaffirmed and sanctioned a then existing significant Jewish view of eternal hell, outlined above. In Matt. 18:6, 26:24 and Luk 10:12, see above, Jesus teaches that there is a punishment worse than death or nonexistence.
• "these shall go away into eternal punishment, Matthew 25:46"
• "the fire of hell where the fire is not quenched and the worm does not die, Mark 9:43-48"
• "cast into a fiery furnace where there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth,” Matthew 13:42, Matthew 13:50
• “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” Matthew 18:6
• “And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.” Matthew 7:23
• “woe unto that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not been born. ” Matthew 26:24
• “But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom, than for that city.” Luke 10:12
…..A punishment worse than death without mercy is also mentioned in Hebrews 10:28-31.
Heb 10:28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:…..Jesus is quoted as using the word death 17 times in the gospels, if He wanted to say eternal death in Matt 25:46, that is what He would have said but He didn’t, He said “eternal punishment.” The Sadducees did not believe in the resurrection, they knew that everybody died; rich, poor, young, old, good, bad, men, women, children, infants and knew that often it had nothing to do with punishment and was permanent. When Jesus taught “eternal punishment” they would not have understood it as merely death, it would have meant something worse to them.
29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
30 For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.
31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
…..Concerning “punishment” one early church father wrote,
“‘Then these reap no advantage from their punishment, as it seems: moreover, I would say that they are not punished unless they are conscious of the punishment.” Justin Martyr [A.D. 110-165.] Dialogue with Trypho Chapter 4…..Jesus undoubtedly knew what the Jews, believed about hell. If the Jews were wrong, why didn’t Jesus tell them there was no hell, no eternal punishment etc? Why would Jesus teach “eternal punishment,” etc. to Jews who believed, "The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity," which would only encourage and reinforce their beliefs?
I don't know if you noticed but I posted considerable evidence in support of what I said. Your post, no evidence=unsupported rumors.Everything you disagree with is a common internet rumor
Unsupported assumptions/presuppositions. If one wants the truth it is easily found with all of the resources available See e.g. my post [# 156]above.The Bible clearly teaches annihilationism. The concept of eternal torment has it's roots in Greek philosophy. It's not taught in the Bible. It entered the church early on and has hung on ever since. It's a tool that kept people in line.
I've refuted your argument more times than I can remember. I'm not wasting any more time. If you ever come to a place where you're willing to accept anything other than you incontrovertible sources and are willing to have a real discussion let me know.I don't know if you noticed but I posted considerable evidence in support of what I said. Your post, no evidence=unsupported rumors.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?