- Dec 30, 2016
- 8,056
- 6,929
- 72
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No link to this pile-on story?
Or it could be true...The first allegation isn't turning out so hot, so the democrats are throwing everything they have at the wall and hoping something sticks.
Or it might not.Or it could be true...
Neither does the politics of personal destruction.I agree...
Sexual predators rarely stop at one...
But they might be true...Or it might not.
I'd be more convinced if the democrats hadn't waited until the last possible moment to unveil all of this. The fact that they delayed as long as they did tells everyone that:
A) this is a politically motivated attack, and
B) they're so unconfident in these claims that they didn't want to give the committee the time to investigate them soon enough to let the vote take place if proven false.
And again- they might not. And if we assume the confidence level of the senate democrats who sat on these claims for weeks for ourselves, they're probably not.But they might be true...
But they might be true...And again- they might not. And if we assume the confidence level of the senate democrats who sat on these claims for weeks for ourselves, they're probably not.
And for the third time, they might not and probably aren't. You're not listening to me, are you?But they might be true...
But they might be true...And for the third time, they might not and probably aren't. You're not listening to me, are you?
Irregardless, they can't be proven. The claims are anywhere from 15 to 36 years old. Law enforcement would have a hard enough time making a case if they'd been reported at the time, they can't be expected to build one decades after the fact based on one person's word and four "eyewitnesses" who disagree with their story, or even "eyewitnesses" who back them up. Where's the hard evidence?
But they might be true...
Thanks for removing all doubt.You're not listening to me, are you?
Still, shifting from "Hey, you'd better put an ice pack on that" to "the woman must be believed no matter what she can't remember and the suspect should be sentenced to 25-life, then maybe we can start the trial" is a bit drastic.