• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

An Empirical Theory Of God (2)

madaz

dyslexic agnostic insomniac
Mar 14, 2012
1,408
26
Gold Coast Australia
✟24,455.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private

Why do you believe the accounts of Jesus are true?
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟320,648.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Why do you believe the accounts of Jesus are true?

I already answered that question. Whereas the Holy Spirit *does not* testify for the genocide claims made by Moses, it does testify for Christ and the teachings of Christ as recorded in the Bible.

If you've ever read a book by Biblical historian like "Honest To Jesus", you'll note that there are "controversies" about which texts may *actually* have come from the lips of Jesus, and I'm well aware of such controversies. Frankly however, I can find no fault in them, and I'm happy to discuss and defend all red letter parts of the Bible. I'll even personally toss in the Gospel of Thomas for you (for the same reason) if that's helpful to you in defining *my* beliefs about God.
 
Upvote 0

madaz

dyslexic agnostic insomniac
Mar 14, 2012
1,408
26
Gold Coast Australia
✟24,455.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I already answered that question. Whereas the Holy Spirit *does not* testify for the genocide claims made by Moses, it does testify for Christ and the teachings of Christ as recorded in the Bible.

So to answer my question succinctly (correct me if I'm wrong)-

You believe the accounts of Jesus are true because of the holy spirit.
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟320,648.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
So to answer my question succinctly (correct me if I'm wrong)-

You believe the accounts of Jesus are true because of the holy spirit.

More specifically I believe that the statements in the Gospels that are attributed to Jesus are true because they are completely congruent with *my own* experiences of God during prayer and meditation.

In all these years, God hasn't ever asked me to commit genocide. Many times however God *has* asked me to swallow my pride and ask for forgiveness. God *has* asked me to put love and forgiveness before my selfish desires for revenge on numerous occasions.

In short I can find no fault in the red letter parts of the Bible as it relates to my own experiences of God. For the record, that's pretty much true of the Gospel of Thomas as well, although the last two sayings seem to have been added much later.
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟320,648.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Do you ever wonder why nobody bothered to record anything about Jesus until many decades after death?

In the case of the Gospel of Thomas I doubt that was the case. I also doubt it was the case for the Gospel of John as well. You're confusing the notion of 'finished Gospels' (as refined works) and various sayings and stories that were probably in circulation all along.
 
Upvote 0

madaz

dyslexic agnostic insomniac
Mar 14, 2012
1,408
26
Gold Coast Australia
✟24,455.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private

Please give me a first hand account? (Recorded prior to 33BCE)
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟320,648.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Please give me a first hand account? (Recorded prior to 33BCE)


John 17 would be another great example of on instance where the statements took place only in the presence of actual first hand Apostles. In fact the whole Gospel of John is *loaded* with long narratives that are associated with Jesus. Only a first hand Apostle would have had the clout within the Early Christian community to attribute such long narratives to Christ and have the works be treated as authentic.

IMO the whole Gospel of John was probably written by the Apostle John himself, with some very small modifications made by his students shortly after his death.

Even the Synoptic Gospels are reported to have been put together based on written previous materials (Q and/or The Gospel of Thomas). There are *many* such parallels.

Mark's Use of the Gospel of Thomas

There is *more* than ample evidence that written materials that were associated with Jesus were likely in circulation *during* his lifetime. Paul even ran around collecting these materials as evidence *against* early Christians. Reading those materials is probably what changed his mind in the first place.
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟320,648.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
As a matter of fact, it's *likely* IMO that that The Gospel of Thomas was put together *during* the life of Jesus as "teaching materials' that the Apostles could take with them when they were 'sent out to teach' others about Christ. Surely they would have wanted to have materials they could refer to while they were out 'preaching the good news" to others while out on the road as evangelists.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Michael,

I am sure you are aware of this, but many NT scholars tend to believe the gospel of John is the least reliable of the four gospels. Any thoughts?
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟320,648.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Michael,

I am sure you are aware of this, but many NT scholars tend to believe the gospel of John is the least reliable of the four gospels. Any thoughts?

I'd need some specific criticisms to work with I suppose. IMO the Gospel of John is probably the *most* reliable of the Gospels and was most likely put together by the Apostle John and/or his first generation students. I doubt it's the quite the same case for the Synoptic Gospels. The Synoptic Gospels come across more like community efforts at putting together full Gospels based on bits of previously circulating materials.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

If you deem the gospel of John to be the most reliable, why would it have been the last of the four gospels penned?
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟320,648.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Michael, can you direct me instead please to a reliable source that states most biblical scholars agree that John was written prior to 33BCE?

Do Biblical Scholars agree on anything? I can give you a couple of Biblical Scholars that believe that it was written by the Apostle John as I do. Most scholars seem to assume that the Gospel was put together in "layers", with at least the first layer being based on personal accounts of Jesus. The text I outlined could not have come from anyone *other than* an Apostle since nobody else was present.

The Gospel according to John by D. A. Carson | Hardcover | Barnes & Noble
Jesus and the Gospels: An Introduction and Survey, Second Edition / Edition 2 by Craig L. Blomberg | Hardcover | Barnes & Noble

From my vantage point you seem to be spending an inordinate amount of now time fixated on the *mechanics* of how the book was put together now rather than the contents. Why? You didn't do that with the OT. What's up with the mechanical/historical critique of the NT?
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Yes, you do have biblical scholars that believe just about anything. Some believe all four gospels were written by the authors stated, some claim they are all historical and some come up with different dates of authorship based on little tid bits that fit an agenda.

Then, you have scholars/historians that believe Jesus never existed, the NT is 100% made up etc. etc..

It should also be noted, that the vast majority of scholars are not exactly unbiased, as they are a high percentage of conservative christian scholars, many of whom earn a paycheck from a theological institution.

That fact is, the consensus amongst scholars, is John was written last amongst the 4 gospels.
 
Upvote 0