• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

An appeal for a new rule

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
There has been talk circulating amongst certain Progs and Formers, myself included, about adding a new rule to the Prog section that would essentially lock the Trads from coming into our area. As it is clear the spite-reporting has gotten only worse in here, I feel this option is more needed than ever.

Hopefully we can continue to work towards a split forum and we Progs can have our own area away from all of this. But in the meantime, I want to know who would be in favor of adding a new rule rule not allowing any Trads to come in here and use our area as yet another vehicle for thier TSDA cyber-bully pulpit. I know most of you Progs wanted to allow them in here, but I also know the mood has changed drastically lately on that for some of you. I, of course, have never wanted them in here and maintained that from day one. It has never made any sense to me to allow people in here who have a clear agenda to get our area shut down and wiped off this forum. The Prog area is nothing but a cancer, a blight to them, a barrier in their goal to make this whole place a P.R. vehicle for TSDAism.

Do I have your support to do what should have been done long ago? :thumbsup:

We have already lost too many good forum members because of this nonsense. The Trads have their own areas and they have taken over the whole forum except in here. Yet they still come in here and report with glee, trying to get us banned. They are blatantly abusing the generosity you have shown them and they are thumbing their noses at you in the process.

Since it seems too much to ask that they leave us alone to our own area, I say we need to enforce a rule that would ban them from coming in here and posting. If they don't like what we say in here, they just need to STAY OUT.

Please, add your support to getting this new rule in place and let's make our corner a place where we can discuss without them coming in here, reporting and getting our threads locked and deleted as well as getting us nailed with RV's.
 

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
NonTSDA mods, please offer some input on this and tell us what our options are for adding this new rule. What are the measures we need to take and how many do we need on board to make it happen?

Outlining procedures for getting this done would also be appreciated. :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

RND

Senior Veteran
Jul 20, 2006
7,807
145
Victorville, California, CorpUSA
Visit site
✟31,272.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
There has been talk circulating amongst certain Progs and Formers, myself included, about adding a new rule to the Prog section that would essentially lock the Trads from coming into our area. As it is clear the spite-reporting has gotten only worse in here, I feel this option is more needed than ever.

Hopefully we can continue to work towards a split forum and we Progs can have our own area away from all of this. But in the meantime, I want to know who would be in favor of adding a new rule rule not allowing any Trads to come in here and use our area as yet another vehicle for thier TSDA cyber-bully pulpit. I know most of you Progs wanted to allow them in here, but I also know the mood has changed drastically lately on that for some of you. I, of course, have never wanted them in here and maintained that from day one. It has never made any sense to me to allow people in here who have a clear agenda to get our area shut down and wiped off this forum. The Prog area is nothing but a cancer, a blight to them, a barrier in their goal to make this whole place a P.R. vehicle for TSDAism.

Do I have your support to do what should have been done long ago? :thumbsup:

We have already lost too many good forum members because of this nonsense. The Trads have their own areas and they have taken over the whole forum except in here. Yet they still come in here and report with glee, trying to get us banned. They are blatantly abusing the generosity you have shown them and they are thumbing their noses at you in the process.

Since it seems too much to ask that they leave us alone to our own area, I say we need to enforce a rule that would ban them from coming in here and posting. If they don't like what we say in here, they just need to STAY OUT.

Please, add your support to getting this new rule in place and let's make our corner a place where we can discuss without them coming in here, reporting and getting our threads locked and deleted as well as getting us nailed with RV's.

Maybe we could make it a 'voluntary' system? The 'progressives' stay out of the 'Traditional' area and the 'traditionalist' stay out of the 'Progressive' area? That would solve the problem don't you think Night?

I like the idea of being able to 'come-and-go' in either forum as I please frankly.
 
Upvote 0
A

AndrewK788

Guest
I like the idea of being able to come and go to any forum too, although I don't think I'm one of the problems.

The thing that presents us with the problem is people going to the other forum and taking it upon themselves what should and should not be said in there. The report button is essentially an "attack" button and is used by people who disagree with the poster.
 
Upvote 0

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
So Honor doesn't like this thread huh?

Oh yeah Andrew--did you notice the new thread Night started in the prog area about keeping the trads out of their area?

Every time someone gets their panties in a wad over there--then the spite reporting starts over here. It's just pure nonsense.

Typical, since she is one of the worst offenders and the one of the main reasons we need this new rule to go into effect.

Get used to it Honor. There are at least seven of us who want this to happen and not all of them are lay-posters either.
 
Upvote 0

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Well Happy some ppl just want to silence those who oppose them. Same thing happened when I gave my opinion about the ghastly way animals are treated in this world when they go to market.

And how many times have you and others reported me for merely giving 'my opinion'?

Yeah, exactly. We are not even in the same ballpark as you Trads are for spite-reporting. Not even CLOSE.

Indeed, I was reported just today for a post in here which was, WOW expressing my OPINION of the Trad mindset regarding absolute truth! Go figure, huh Honor?

Yeah, you know the score. Dish it out in spades but bawl like a baby when it happens to you.
 
Upvote 0

honorthesabbath

Senior Veteran
Aug 10, 2005
4,067
78
76
Arkansas
✟27,180.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Well Happy some ppl just want to silence those who oppose them. Same thing happened when I gave my opinion about the ghastly way animals are treated in this world when they go to market.

And how many times have you and others reported me for merely giving 'my opinion'?

Yeah, exactly. We are not even in the same ballpark as you Trads are for spite-reporting. Not even CLOSE.

Indeed, I was reported just today for a post in here which was, WOW expressing my OPINION of the Trad mindset regarding absolute truth! Go figure, huh Honor?

Yeah, you know the score. Dish it out in spades but bawl like a baby when it happens to you.
I didn't report you Night--and haven't for quite some time although many times you needed to be.
 
Upvote 0

honorthesabbath

Senior Veteran
Aug 10, 2005
4,067
78
76
Arkansas
✟27,180.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Well Happy some ppl just want to silence those who oppose them. Same thing happened when I gave my opinion about the ghastly way animals are treated in this world when they go to market.

And how many times have you and others reported me for merely giving 'my opinion'?

Yeah, exactly. We are not even in the same ballpark as you Trads are for spite-reporting. Not even CLOSE.

Indeed, I was reported just today for a post in here which was, WOW expressing my OPINION of the Trad mindset regarding absolute truth! Go figure, huh Honor?

Yeah, you know the score. Dish it out in spades but bawl like a baby when it happens to you.
Well Night--as you know--I would prefer a total forum split-I have for a long time now. I just find it so hilarious that when the this sub-forum rules were being voted upon by you guys, you all bragged so much about how open-minded you were and so very tolerant of other ppl's opinions and invited ALL, even the trads into this forum. But now we find that that isn't the truth at all is it? Now you want to bar a certain segment of your church from partaking in your discussions.

Isn't this a bit disingenuous?
 
Upvote 0

RC_NewProtestants

Senior Veteran
May 2, 2006
2,766
63
Washington State
Visit site
✟25,750.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
If BOTH sides would be courteous of one another and treat each other with love and respect, despite differences, there wouldn't be a problem.

Differing believes isn't the problem. It's the way people conduct themselves.

And from what I've seen on CF, that goes for both sides!

that was the idea behind leaving the prog sub-forum open. Of course the Trad's created a sub-forum with severe restrictions and a particularly narrow view allowed. We can't do that or we would be just like the Traditionals and that is not acceptable. That there are several of the Traditionals who come here simply to cause trouble merely shows their lack of courtesy and intolerance. They have their own sub-forum but desire to act as if the progressive sub-forum is theirs also. And they strike out at visitors here as if it was a Traditional sub-forum.

So you may think that this is from both sides but we are really dealing with the hypocrisy of certain of the traditionalists. Certainly not all just a few. They have been asked not to bother use on this sub forum and simply disregard the requests.

I don't think the answer to dealing with jerks is to behave like jerks. So I can't go along with making the progressive sub forum restricted like the traditionals have done with theirs. It is rather like the sermon on the mount where we need to be patient with those who are offensive, hypocritical, those who take what is not theirs.

It is of course all the more telling on a Christian forum to see people behave so badly and to provoke others to behave badly.
 
Upvote 0
A

AndrewK788

Guest
I am aware of the Trads' restrictions on their forum. I like that the progs want to keep theirs open as well.

But my point still stands. I didn't ask for finger-pointing. I know who most of the "trouble makers" are and, yes, they do come from both sides. Whether it be abusing reports, flaming or antagonism, or taking severe offense at issues that do not concern them.

I'm not an old-timer here but I've been here long enough to know who usually causes a stir...and also who is the mostly likely to strike back.
 
Upvote 0

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I didn't report you Night--and haven't for quite some time although many times you needed to be.

As you have MANY TIMES.

I don't care if it was you or not. You Trads are all the same to me, so I am just as happy to hold you responsible for the attacks of your cohorts as anyone.
 
Upvote 0

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Well Night--as you know--I would prefer a total forum split-I have for a long time now.

Good. Now just convince your collegues over there that this is what needs to be done and we're on our way to the promised land.

I just find it so hilarious that when the this sub-forum rules were being voted upon by you guys, you all bragged so much about how open-minded you were and so very tolerant of other ppl's opinions and invited ALL, even the trads into this forum.

Not me. You need to take that up with the others, because as I have stated MANY TIMES I never wanted you guys in here AT ALL. I made that VERY CLEAR.

Unfortunately, I was outnumbered! :|

But now we find that that isn't the truth at all is it?

Not for me. It never was.

Now you want to bar a certain segment of your church from partaking in your discussions.

Oh yeah. You betcha britches I do! :thumbsup:

GET OUT AND STAY OUT.

Isn't this a bit disingenuous?

No, because as I have tried to explain to you ad-nauseum I NEVER WANTED TO ALLOW TRADS IN HERE AND I NEVER LENT MY VOICE TO THE APPROVAL OF SUCH A THING. So please stop trying to hold me responsible for what the OTHER Progs agreed to!!

Do I need to post that in 48 font so you don't miss it AGAIN? :doh:
 
Upvote 0

honorthesabbath

Senior Veteran
Aug 10, 2005
4,067
78
76
Arkansas
✟27,180.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
As you have MANY TIMES.

I don't care if it was you or not. You Trads are all the same to me, so I am just as happy to hold you responsible for the attacks of your cohorts as anyone.
Now thats a good example of reasonable thinking.
 
Upvote 0

honorthesabbath

Senior Veteran
Aug 10, 2005
4,067
78
76
Arkansas
✟27,180.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Well Night--as you know--I would prefer a total forum split-I have for a long time now.

Good. Now just convince your collegues over there that this is what needs to be done and we're on our way to the promised land.

I just find it so hilarious that when the this sub-forum rules were being voted upon by you guys, you all bragged so much about how open-minded you were and so very tolerant of other ppl's opinions and invited ALL, even the trads into this forum.

Not me. You need to take that up with the others, because as I have stated MANY TIMES I never wanted you guys in here AT ALL. I made that VERY CLEAR.

Unfortunately, I was outnumbered! :|

But now we find that that isn't the truth at all is it?

Not for me. It never was.

Now you want to bar a certain segment of your church from partaking in your discussions.

Oh yeah. You betcha britches I do! :thumbsup:

GET OUT AND STAY OUT.

Isn't this a bit disingenuous?

No, because as I have tried to explain to you ad-nauseum I NEVER WANTED TO ALLOW TRADS IN HERE AND I NEVER LENT MY VOICE TO THE APPROVAL OF SUCH A THING. So please stop trying to hold me responsible for what the OTHER Progs agreed to!!

Do I need to post that in 48 font so you don't miss it AGAIN? :doh:
hhhmmm- I guess you can 'clump', but I can't? Interesting!

I don't care if it was you or not. You Trads are all the same to me, so I am just as happy to hold you responsible for the attacks of your cohorts as anyone.
 
Upvote 0