• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Amos 3:7, the New Testament & the Commandments

listed

are you?
May 14, 2011
9,126
1,817
✟53,797.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Not really for those with understanding.
 
Reactions: bugkiller
Upvote 0

listed

are you?
May 14, 2011
9,126
1,817
✟53,797.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The better idea would be to read what buggy posted without changing what he said.
 
Reactions: bugkiller
Upvote 0

listed

are you?
May 14, 2011
9,126
1,817
✟53,797.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
This is no explanation. It does however largely ignore verse 32.
 
Reactions: bugkiller
Upvote 0

listed

are you?
May 14, 2011
9,126
1,817
✟53,797.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Bob S, Bugkiller and Listed,
I feel like I have replied to your questions and I was hoping one of you could reply to the question I asked of you.

Where was it prophecied in the Tenakh (OT) that the Messiah was going to do away with God's law?
We told you. You even posted it.
 
Reactions: bugkiller
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,499
11,987
Georgia
✟1,109,122.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Bob S, Bugkiller and Listed,
I feel like I have replied to your questions and I was hoping one of you could reply to the question I asked of you.

Where was it prophecied in the Tenakh (OT) that the Messiah was going to do away with God's law?

Great post!
 
Reactions: 1John2:4
Upvote 0

1John2:4

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2016
1,204
361
48
New Braunfels, TX
✟40,108.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
This is no explanation. It does however largely ignore verse 32.
Right verse 32- no it's not like the Covenant He made, instead of the Law being written on stone, it (the law, the whole law not parts of the law) are written on flesh. That is the difference in the covenant.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,499
11,987
Georgia
✟1,109,122.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married

Very true. The Covenant has the same LAW of God - as known to Jeremiah - but under the NEW Covenant it is written on the heart and mind.

Which means it is "STILL wrong to take God's name in vain" EVEN under the New Covenant.

As we all know... and indeed very obvious.
 
Upvote 0

listed

are you?
May 14, 2011
9,126
1,817
✟53,797.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Right verse 32- no it's not like the Covenant He made, instead of the Law being written on stone, it (the law, the whole law not parts of the law) are written on flesh. That is the difference in the covenant.
The verses is about contents, not place written.
 
Upvote 0

1John2:4

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2016
1,204
361
48
New Braunfels, TX
✟40,108.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Exteamly obvious
 
Upvote 0

1John2:4

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2016
1,204
361
48
New Braunfels, TX
✟40,108.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
The verses is about contents, not place written.
It looks like you are only looking at the one verse, verse 32and taking it completely out of context. He said it is different because He takes His Law and places it on our minds and hearts. Y'all do this with fullfilled in Matthew 5 you stop at fullfill and fill in the blanks with some bizarre doctrine that is not even within the context of the passage. Why do you do this? The context explains what the meaning of the passage.
 
Reactions: BobRyan
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,499
11,987
Georgia
✟1,109,122.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Jeremiah 31
31 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a New Covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the Lord:
33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.

This isn't the covenant given to Israel.

In "the text" it is made with the House o Israel - as we all can see when we read the text.
In "the text" it is Jeremiah writing to his contemporaries about the LAW known to them both - as we can all see.

This part is irrefutable. Both covenants deal with God's Law -- known to Jeremiah and his readers.

Same LAW of God, different context/location
 
Reactions: 1John2:4
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,499
11,987
Georgia
✟1,109,122.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I'm sorry, I must have missed it , please please post the verse again.

I already did it - some place , somewhere in the past ... hard to find ... must-a-been some place though. Surely I must have done it. hopefully.
 
Reactions: 1John2:4
Upvote 0

1John2:4

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2016
1,204
361
48
New Braunfels, TX
✟40,108.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Again, aside from Jerimiah 31:32 (which was obviously taken out of context) where is it prophecied God's law was to be abolished, finished, distroyed, fullfilled(with the meaning that is distroyed) completed come to an end. Anywhere in the Tenakh? Anywhere?
 
Reactions: SAAN
Upvote 0

Yanni depp

Est. 1986
Jun 8, 2017
446
313
BC
✟79,522.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian

This thread is about the decalogue being done away with. As in made irrelevant, isnt it?

Original post....
So where in any of the prophets did God reveal to them that the 10 commandments were temporary or that he was going to abolish all of his commands in the future???

Jesus lived a perfect life adhering to the Law and died for our sins. That sounds fulfilling.

John 14:15
Romans 6:1
Matthew 5:17-20
Matthew 5-7

These verses tell me that the decalogue isnt irrelevent. Thats what im saying.

You dont like that?
 
Upvote 0