- Jul 6, 2002
- 13,043
- 1,674
- 58
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
As funny as it is to think of Mach as a paid operative, I really think he was posting of his own free will.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well played. BTW, what clues that he has shown you?
It is not those being hated that are the problem, but those who are doing the hating.A "hater" is one who does not bow to the views and politics of the person who is calling the name. It's interesting that I only see one "side" designating others as haters.
As funny as it is to think of Mach as a paid operative, I really think he was posting of his own free will.
I mess his tap dancing schematics, though.Oh I don't think that Mach was a paid operative just someone who was amazingly good at taking what was a good thread and destroying it.
I don't, I can't tell you how many threads with really good thread went from people discussing the subject to discussing the off topic tangents he brought to the thread. It got to the point that I would just unsub from threads once I saw he was posting in it.I mess his tap dancing schematics, though.
I actually have a blast here at least 50% of the time. I put the people who set out to deliberately flame and goad on ignore and focus on the people who are interesting, informative, and capable of having a real discussion. Mostly they are from "my" party, which is inevitable,
I don't believe that anyone's getting paid to attend a Christian forum to argue about politics. It's just too silly to be true.
grasping the after wind said:I can only go by what I see here. It is IMO entirely impossible to believe that anyone could ever honestly be as 100% exactly behind everything a political party or personage does without being paid to parrot the party line. No one is that completely in tune with another person and surely not with a political party's stance on every issue, They tend to rely on quoting the same statistics, using the exact same phrasing and parrotting the same cliches and buzz words that the party paying them has provided while just simply ignoring any evidence given that is contrary to their talking points and only ever attacking the opposing person or that person's sources but never actually addressing the issues brought up by the person they attack.
What in your opinion is "hating" but what in the opinion of others is simply holding to their own opinion and stating it firmly.It is not those being hated that are the problem, but those who are doing the hating.
Kind of like a damage controldoctor.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?