- Jul 2, 2018
- 18,580
- 11,385
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Well said!... God's justice is about setting right, not about getting even. ...
Upvote
0
Well said!... God's justice is about setting right, not about getting even. ...
Clearly the three doctrinal views of the final judgement are in conflict.
- Damnationism says the damned will be in eternal conscious torment.
- Annihilationism says the damned will be incinerated and cease to exist.
- Universal Restorationism says that God will restore all things to life, including "the damned".
Previous post:
All three doctrines of the final judgment have biblical support. Yet are in conflict.
1) Damnationism
2) Annihilationism
3) Universal Restorationism
You can't really brush aside the supporting scripture for one view in favor of another. All scripture is valid. What you seem to be claiming is that 1Tim.4:10 is not valid due to your understanding of the "narrow way".
Mostly irrelevant bloviation.I have noticed a few features of choice #1
1. Damnation involves eternal conscious torment in a place called "Hell."
2. "Hell" is translated from four words, at least two of which come from the language of the pagan Greeks, and from their pagan mythology.
3. "Hades" is the best word in the Greek for the Hebrew "Sheol," but "hades" carries with it some unfortunate pagan connotations.
4. Remembering that the ancestors of the classical Greeks came down from the North, I discovered that the old, pagan languages of Northern Europe had related words like "hel," "hell," "helle," "halja" and the like.
5. Later, I found "Hel" in Norse mythology: she was the supposed ruler of her afterlife ream of "Helheim" or "House of Hel." It was, they thought, where you went if you did not rate going to Valhalla.
6. "Hel," "Hell" and "Helle" are all found in the epic of "Beowulf," which contains both pagan and Christian elements.
7. Later, "Hel" and "Hell" show up in the 1611 KJV. Do you see yet how pagan words came in and got (dare I say it?) baptized?
8. I also have noticed that the Bible never describes Hell, but depictions of it in Christian art are very much like what we see in the art of other religions, Tibetan Buddhist in particular.
9. Our views of Hell are largely controlled by epic poetry (Dante and Milton), prose (Mary K. Baxter and others), plus cartoons, stories and movies almost without number.
10. Why not believe the Bible, minus the bad translating, and put away such pagan notions? I have other ways to discredit Hell, but pointing out the history of the word should be enough.
Why would the Creator of the whole universe care about getting even?
Mostly irrelevant bloviation.
What a word might have meant in another country, another language 100s of years ago is irrelevant unless a direct connection can be shown.
When we hear the word "truck" we think of a large boxy vehicle for hauling large, heavy cargo not vegetables.
Today in German "hell" means bright. How can we connect that?
…..According to three irrefutable Jewish sources; the Jewish Encyclopedia, Encyclopedia Judaica and the Talmud, quoted below, among the יהודים/Yehudim/ιουδαιων/Youdaion/Jews in Israel, before and during the time of Jesus, there was a belief in a place of everlasting torment of the wicked and they called it both sheol and gehinnom, which is translated hades and gehenna in both the 225 BC LXX and the NT.
…..There were different factions within Judaism; Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes etc. and there were different beliefs about resurrection, hell etc. These differing beliefs do not rebut, refute, change or disprove anything in this post.
Jewish Encyclopedia, Gehenna[Note, this is according to the ancient Jews, long before the Christian era, NOT any alleged bias of modern Christian translators. DA]
The place where children were sacrificed to the god Moloch … in the "valley of the son of Hinnom," to the south of Jerusalem (Josh. xv. 8, passim; II Kings xxiii. 10; Jer. ii. 23; vii. 31-32; xix. 6, 13-14). … the valley was deemed to be accursed, and "Gehenna" therefore soon became a figurative equivalent for "hell." Hell, like paradise, was created by God (Sotah 22a);[“Soon” in this verse would be about 700 BC +/-]
(I)n general …sinners go to hell immediately after their death. The famous teacher Johanan b. Zakkai wept before his death because he did not know whether he would go to paradise or to hell (Ber. 28b). The pious go to paradise, and sinners to hell(B.M. 83b).When Jesus taught e.g.,
But as regards the heretics, etc., and Jeroboam, Nebat's son, hell shall pass away, but they shall not pass away" (R. H. 17a; comp. Shab. 33b). All that descend into Gehenna shall come up again, with the exception of three classes of men: those who have committed adultery, or shamed their neighbors, or vilified them (B. M. 58b).[/i]
… heretics and the Roman oppressors go to Gehenna, and the same fate awaits the Persians, the oppressors of the Babylonian Jews (Ber. 8b). When Nebuchadnezzar descended into hell, [שאול/Sheol] all its inhabitants were afraid that he was coming to rule over them (Shab. 149a; comp. Isa. xiv. 9-10). The Book of Enoch [x. 6, xci. 9, etal] also says that it is chiefly the heathen who are to be cast into the fiery pool on the Day of Judgment (x. 6, xci. 9, et al). "The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity" (Judith xvi. 17). The sinners in Gehenna will be filled with pain when God puts back the souls into the dead bodies on the Day of Judgment, according toIsa. xxxiii. 11 (Sanh. 108b).
Link: Jewish Encyclopedia Online
Note, scripture references are highlighted in blue.
= = = = = = = = = =
Encyclopedia Judaica:
Gehinnom (Heb. גֵּי בֶן־הִנֹּם, גֵּי בְנֵי הִנֹּם, גֵּיא בֶן־הִנֹּם, גֵּיא הִנֹּם; Gr. Γέεννα; "Valley of Ben-Hinnom, Valley of [the Son (s) of] Hinnom," Gehenna), a valley south of Jerusalem on one of the borders between the territories of Judah and Benjamin, between the Valley of *Rephaim and *En-Rogel (Josh. 15:8; 18:16). It is identified with Wadi er-Rababi.
…..During the time of the Monarchy, Gehinnom, at a place called Topheth, was the site of a cult which involved the burning of children (II Kings 23:10; Jer. 7:31; 32:35 et al.; ). Jeremiah repeatedly condemned this cult and predicted that on its account Topheth and the Valley of the Son of Hinnom would be called the Valley of the "Slaughter" (Jer. 19:5–6).
In Judaism the name Gehinnom is generally used as an appellation of the place of torment reserved for the wicked after death. The New Testament used the Greek form Gehenna in the same sense.
Gehinnom
http://www.jevzajcg.me/enciklopedia/Encyclopaedia Judaica, v. 07 (Fey-Gor).pdf
= = = = = = = = = =
Talmud -Tractate Rosh Hashanah Chapter 1.
The school of Hillel says: . . . but as for Minim, [followers of Jesus] informers and disbelievers, who deny the Torah, or Resurrection, or separate themselves from the congregation, or who inspire their fellowmen with dread of them, or who sin and cause others to sin, as did Jeroboam the son of Nebat and his followers, they all descend to Gehenna, and are judged there from generation to generation, as it is said [Isa. lxvi. 24]:
"And they shall go forth and look upon the carcases of the men who have transgressed against Me; for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched." Even when Gehenna will be destroyed, they will not be consumed, as it is written[Psalms, xlix. 15]: "And their forms wasteth away in the nether world," which the sages comment upon to mean that their forms shall endure even when the grave is no more.
Concerning them Hannah says [I Sam. ii. 10]: "The adversaries of the Lord shall be broken to pieces."
Link: Tract Rosh Hashana: Chapter I.
• “Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:” Matthew 25:41…..These teachings tacitly reaffirmed and sanctioned a then existing significant Jewish view of eternal hell, outlined above. In Matt. 18:6, 26:24 and Luk 10:12, see above, Jesus teaches that there is a punishment worse than death or nonexistence.
• "these shall go away into eternal punishment, Matthew 25:46"
• "the fire of hell [Γέεννα/gehenna] where the fire is not quenched and the worm does not die, 3X Mark 9:43-48"
• "cast into a fiery furnace where there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth,” Matthew 13:42, Matthew 13:50
• “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” Matthew 18:6
• “And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.” Matthew 7:23
• “woe unto that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not been born. ” Matthew 26:24
• “But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom, than for that city.” Luke 10:12
…..A punishment worse than death without mercy is also mentioned in Hebrews 10:28-31.
Heb 10:28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:…..Jesus is quoted as using the word death 17 times in the gospels, if He intended to say eternal death in Matt 25:46, that is what He would have said but He didn’t, He said “eternal punishment.”
29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
30 For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.
31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
….The Sadducees did not believe in the resurrection, they knew that everybody died; rich, poor, young, old, good, bad, men, women, children, infants and knew that often it had nothing to do with punishment and was permanent.
When Jesus taught “eternal punishment” they would not have understood it as merely death, it would have meant something worse to them.
…..Concerning “punishment” one early church father wrote,
“Then these reap no advantage from their punishment, as it seems: moreover, I would say that they are not punished unless they are conscious of the punishment.” Justin Martyr [A.D. 110-165.] Dialogue with Trypho Chapter 4…..Jesus undoubtedly knew what the Jews, believed about hell. If that Jewish teaching was wrong, why didn’t Jesus tell them there was no hell, no eternal punishment etc? Why would Jesus teach “eternal punishment,” etc. to Jews who believed, "The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity," which would only encourage and reinforce their beliefs in “hell”?
Some folks seem to think that anything they find on the 'net which seems to support their beliefs must be the truth. I try to research what I post with the same diligence that I used when working on my degrees. I try to only use credible sources something which might be accepted by a professor. I once submitted a paper in grad school the prof's assistant scrawled across it in red. "Do you consider this a professional source?" I thought to myself "Not any more I don't.""Bloviation" -now that's a good one, and I had to look it up. You always find terms to minimize your thread opponent, but this is a new low. Usually "nonsense" and "irrelevant" suffice. I have noticed that others are always wrong and Der Alte is always correct. BTW, I did not read much past "bloviation," having little interest in arguments which begin with insults. However, it was more than I usually read of your posts. Oh, while I'm thinking of it, thanks for the vocabulary lesson...
See above response. Just because it is on the internet that doesn't mean it is true or credible.But seriously, I believe I did connect original word meanings with Norse mythology, their use in "Beowulf," the 1611 KJV and modern parlance. I can only suppose a heavy tome with hundreds of footnotes is required to impress you. I suppose ideas thrown out on a www discussion forum must be automatically suspect and therefore false.
What the Jews might have believed about Jesus or anything else is not really relevant. My sources are the only credible sources which document the faith and practice of the ancient Jews, what they believed etc. Do you know of any other credible, historical sources which will accurately document the faith and practice of Jews before and during the time of Jesus? If you happen to find any let me know and I will consider it. I'm not holding my breath.I saw your old phrase "three irrefutable Jewish sources" and I'd like to ask you this:
Two of those sources are encyclopedias, so tell me how an encyclopedia, written and compiled by men, is irrefutable?
The other source is the Talmud, so tell me - if it is irrefutable, and since it blasts Jesus and His followers (Yes, I know a thing or two about the Talmud, so don't deny it.), why have you not converted to their religion?
Although I explained it to you, and you seemed to not understand, I will revise my statement to something likeDer Alte, please cite me a credible source that demonstrates that I only consulted www sources in my research. Actually, my most important sources were a very ordinary King James Bible and the Oxford English Dictionary. Your assumption in Post #347 about the internet is just another elitist tactic, and I don't buy it. Yes, I agree that the Talmud is a good source for what the Jews of a time and place believed, BUT parts of it are blasphemous from a Christian perspective, and I worry for you to say it is irrefutable. I fear that you are trying to serve two masters.
Although I explained it to you, and you seemed to not understand, I will revise my statement to something like
Concerning only the faith, beliefs and practices of the ancient Jews these three incontrovertible Jewish sources; the Jewish Encyclopedia, Encyclopedia Judaica and the Talmud, are quoted below.
According to these sources among the יהודים/Yehudim/ιουδαιων/Youdaion/Jews in Israel, before and during the time of Jesus, there was a significant belief in a place of everlasting torment of the wicked and they called it both sheol and gehinnom which are translated hades and gehenna in both the 225 BC LXX and the NT.
Which may or may not be true and which Jesus did nothing to correct. Instead what Jesus taught about Gehenna, sheol, eternal punishment etc. mirrored the then existing belief in the place of eternal fiery punishment for the wicked. Jesus undoubtedly knew of the existing beliefs, shouldn't He have taught against those beliefs if they were not Biblical.?I notice that these beliefs arose AFTER contact with the pagan Babylonians and Greeks. The books written before such contacts are oddly silent on such things, as far as I know. * * * *
Which may or may not be true and which Jesus did nothing to correct. Instead what Jesus taught about Gehenna, sheol, eternal punishment etc. mirrored the then existing belief in the place of eternal fiery punishment for the wicked. Jesus undoubtedly knew of the existing beliefs, shouldn't He have taught against those beliefs if they were not Biblical.?
Please explain to me how this relates to my post which you quoted?At one point in my research on Hell, I took a close look at what Jesus said Himself about His Mission, why He was here in that time and place. Do you find any mention of theological discussion in those statements? * * *
I agreeI debated about posting this but I'm just curious,.. am I the only Christian on here who believes that through the sacrifice of Christ unbelievers can still be saved after they're judged? Or are there others on here as well? (Please don't try and get me to change my views because it isn't going to work and that's not what this thread is about.)
Why would the Creator of the whole universe care about getting even?
Saint Steven said:Clearly the three doctrinal views of the final judgement are in conflict.
- Damnationism says the damned will be in eternal conscious torment.
- Annihilationism says the damned will be incinerated and cease to exist.
- Universal Restorationism says that God will restore all things to life, including "the damned".
Previous post:
All three doctrines of the final judgment have biblical support. Yet are in conflict.
1) Damnationism
2) Annihilationism
3) Universal Restorationism
You can't really brush aside the supporting scripture for one view in favor of another. All scripture is valid. What you seem to be claiming is that 1Tim.4:10 is not valid due to your understanding of the "narrow way".
Why does this verse not stop at "the savior of all people?" Why does it continue "and especially of those who believe?" Doesn't "all people" inherently include "those who believe?" Didn't Paul know that "all people" included "those who believe?"
Would Paul say in this one verse that the living God is the savior of all people and mean every single person who ever lived or will live, no matter what, and then say 23 categories of people will not inherit the kingdom of God?
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
Galatians 5:19-21
19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
Ephesian 5:5 For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.
1 Corinthians 3:17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.
am I the only Christian on here who believes that through the sacrifice of Christ unbelievers can still be saved after they're judged?
You’re not the only one, @April_Rose. Many posters here on CF agree with your thoughts and feelings on the subject, I find it encouraging to believe that unbelievers could still be saved after being judged for their bad deeds.
I find it encouraging to believe that unbelievers could still be saved after being judged for their bad deeds.
I debated about posting this but I'm just curious,.. am I the only Christian on here who believes that through the sacrifice of Christ unbelievers can still be saved after they're judged? Or are there others on here as well? (Please don't try and get me to change my views because it isn't going to work and that's not what this thread is about.)