Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not really. Denial of science is controversial.
Since you know so much about me, how do I define science? What orthodoxy do I have that requires defending?"Science" as defined by people like you, people with an established orthodoxy to defend? Science is a method of enquiry, a tool, not an established philosophical prejudice like atheism or materialism.
Since you know so much about me, how do I define science?
Sure it is. If you doubt, you ask questions and investigate. You should try it - investigate faulty memory, you'll learn something.
Science is not in service to doubt
Sure it is. If you doubt, you ask questions and investigate.
Lol. This from the guy who hasn't investigated anything, ever. Just sits back and tells everyone he knows better.
You are not investigating this effect
Lol. This from the guy who hasn't investigated anything, ever. Just sits back and tells everyone he knows better.
Since you know so much about me, how do I define science? What orthodoxy do I have that requires defending?
Lol. This from the guy who hasn't investigated anything, ever. Just sits back and tells everyone he knows better.
Because he and I have been posting here for a while. Read his posts, you'll understand.How do you actually know this?
You didn't answer my questions. You made 2 claims which I asked you to support. If you'd like to ask me additional questions that's fine, but only after you've responded to mine.What did you mean by your "denial of science" remark? No one denies the effectiveness of the methodology, the end results (ex. technology) of science, so I'm not quite sure what your comment was that I responded to was supposed to have been all about.
People don't "deny science"; they deny some of the conclusions that scientists reach, which is an entirely different matter.
Because he and I have been posting here for a while. Read his posts, you'll understand.
Correct. But false memory is a highly plausible explanation for the effect with masses of supporting evidence. Changing timelines has zero supporting evidence and is indistinguishable from a lazy assertion.Case in point…
The Mandela effect is not false memory
A perfect example. Keep it up!
You do it on a regular basis. What is apparent is that you conflate "you don't understand" with "you don't agree with my assertion". It's time you understood they are not synonymous.
There is no way to tell you that you don’t understand
You do it on a regular basis.
What is apparent is that you conflate "you don't understand" with "you don't agree with my assertion". It's time you understood they are not synonymous.
Not yet understanding is not stupidity
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?