Ammon said:Reason requires, for a lack of better expression, scientific proof. Such does not exist for the majority of the Bible or the existence of God. Thus, reason has nothing to do with faith. Faith is a principle unto itself, not dependent on reason.
Hi there!
I totally disagree.... The majority of the Bible is supported by historical or archaeological evidences. The point that is lacking, is that it doesn't suit your personal definition.
Now... the comment on "God"... that's added to eleviate the possibility of discussing the overall subject... for a believe in God is based upon "faith".
Now.. for point... neither historical evidences or archaeological evidences are "scientific"... for they cannot be replicated. Using that same theology... there are no "proofs" for the bom... therefore... it must be accepted only on faith... and rip out those first pages of the bom where the "witness" statements are posted...
That cannot be replicated, therefore, must not be true... according to "science" and your defining words....
"I rest my case".
~serapha~
Upvote
0