I always acknowledge first that I am a gay man and consider myself as a Christian so anyone will know where I'm coming from. It was a great conflict in my youth.
However, now when confronted with this issue I refer people back to the Bible. I recommend reading Samuel I beginning with chapter 18 through Samuel II chapter I.
Don't focus on the relationship of David and Saul, but on the relationship between David and Jonathan (the son of Saul). If there is any question as to their relationship I believe that it is answered in Samuel II chapter I verse 26 when upon learning of Jonathan's death David declares " I am distressed for you, my brother Jonathan; You have been very pleasant (underline added) to me; Your love to me was wonderful, Surpassing the love of women."
I believe that that verse speaks for itself.
I also go to Matthew chapter 19. Although Jesus is questioned on the issue of divorce, look to verses 9 through 12. First if there is anyone out there that has divorced his wife, except for sexual immorality and marries another...according to this verse he is committing adultery. So be careful to judge others!
But when asked that "If such is the case of the man with his wife, is it better not to marry." Jesus answers in verse 11 "All cannot accept this saying, but only those to whom it has been given:
12: "For there are eunuchs who were born thus from their mother's womb, and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He who is able to accept it, let him accept it."
Since there was no word for homosexual during this period of time many belive that eunuch referred to all men that did not have sex with women, not just those that had been "castrated".
Those that came from their mother's womb...referring to homosexuals? Those eunuchs that made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake...referring to a vow celibacy? Questionable that these two meant that children from their mother's womb and men of religion were castrated.
So from verse 11 I feel that my "homosexuality" was "given to me."
However, now when confronted with this issue I refer people back to the Bible. I recommend reading Samuel I beginning with chapter 18 through Samuel II chapter I.
Don't focus on the relationship of David and Saul, but on the relationship between David and Jonathan (the son of Saul). If there is any question as to their relationship I believe that it is answered in Samuel II chapter I verse 26 when upon learning of Jonathan's death David declares " I am distressed for you, my brother Jonathan; You have been very pleasant (underline added) to me; Your love to me was wonderful, Surpassing the love of women."
I believe that that verse speaks for itself.
I also go to Matthew chapter 19. Although Jesus is questioned on the issue of divorce, look to verses 9 through 12. First if there is anyone out there that has divorced his wife, except for sexual immorality and marries another...according to this verse he is committing adultery. So be careful to judge others!
But when asked that "If such is the case of the man with his wife, is it better not to marry." Jesus answers in verse 11 "All cannot accept this saying, but only those to whom it has been given:
12: "For there are eunuchs who were born thus from their mother's womb, and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He who is able to accept it, let him accept it."
Since there was no word for homosexual during this period of time many belive that eunuch referred to all men that did not have sex with women, not just those that had been "castrated".
Those that came from their mother's womb...referring to homosexuals? Those eunuchs that made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake...referring to a vow celibacy? Questionable that these two meant that children from their mother's womb and men of religion were castrated.
So from verse 11 I feel that my "homosexuality" was "given to me."
Upvote
0