Hans Blaster
Hood was a loser.
- Mar 11, 2017
- 21,575
- 16,278
- 55
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
BASIC, we haven't seen that language 'round these parts in nigh on a generation. The graphics elements must be some sort of customization of a particular vendor that is unfamiliar to me.I think a major weakness in AI is in evaluating images.
In another thread ( Further evaluation of windmills contributing to the Greenhouse effect as being pseudoscience. ), GPT-4o badly failed a fluid mechanics exam when the paper was scanned and inputted as an image file; by comparison it passed with flying colours when the exam was inputted directly as a message.
Taking this into consideration I decided to give GPT-4o my BASIC program of the generation of the graph r = cos(4θ) and as the challenge to see if it could translate the BASIC program into Python and make sense of the resultant image.
Here is the BASIC program and image output.
View attachment 354188
It clearly fails to recognize the your pixel coordinates are just that and not something important.Here is GPT-4o's translation into Python and image output.
View attachment 354189
Sigh once again so near and yet so far, I have no idea why GPT-4o has incorporated orthogonal axes and what the values on these axes are supposed to mean.
That's super weird.It also flipped the 90 and 270 degrees labels indicating the graph is based on the polar equation r = cos(-4θ) instead of r = cos(4θ).
Upvote
0