Darth,
If I might put it slightly less polemically than the other person on this question, I'd answer yout his way:
The book of Genesis actually has a lot that doesn't line up with science. For example, it contains the common Ancient Near Eastern concept of waters above a domed sky and waters below the earth:
And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
This idea of a firmament with the waters above and below is found in other Ancient Near Eastern Literature which gives us more information about it. The sky = the firmament, and is a solid dome stretched over us. Above it are the waters which, when the firmament opens, flood through as rain (or other precipitation). You can also see that there are "waters below" (ie the earth). This is WHY the expression is put this way later in Genesis:
In the six hundredth year of Noahs life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
The word "deep" there is the word for the abyss in hebrew, a primeval ocean that is under our feet. You see, in Ancient Near Eastern thought, the ground was actually on top of an ocean, held up on pillars at the shore. Thus Jonah 2.6:
I went down to the bottoms of the mountains; the earth with her bars was about me for ever: yet hast thou brought up my life from corruption, O LORD my God.
I don't have time to finish bringing this full circle. But what I hope you are realising is that we are not talking about a book that is meant to be scientific. Science as we know it did not exist and did not matter to Moses or the Hebrews; that was not God's purpose in inspiring Genesis. What was God's purpose? To show in the beginning that it was GOD who created the heavens and the earth -- not El or any of the others of the Canaanite and Egyptian Pantheons.