Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
12volt_man said:But isn't that all the more reason they need the nanny state to come in and level the playing field?
If they're going to be consistent, then they should say, "if we are going to have a colorblind society, then we must legislate that N.B.A. teams give preference to white players."
MethodMan said:Ever done any work for NYCTA? MARTA? WAMATA?
mhatten said:Unfortunately we are not going to have a colorblind society and I don't know anyone who thinks so.
mhatten said:No because they have nanny daddy to come in and level the field for them.
cough GWB cough
Now if people actually did that perhaps we wouldn't need the "nanny" state. I say people made their bed now they don't like laying in it well in all honesty, too bad.
12volt_man said:But we do need it because liberals would be like a rudderless ship without it.
Jetgirl said:If we're not going to have a colorblind society why did they spend so much time and effort teaching the children of my generation to be colorblind?
I never even really had a concept of race as a significant difference between people until I got to college and discovered that, for some reason, black people who grew up in the same neighborhoods and same economic situations as I were very negative towards me.
mhatten said:Let me ask should nothing have been done, should the "nanny" state left the status quo as is?
mhatten said:I don't know, and I don'y know who they are what I do know is people discriminate. Period. So I ask you like I asked 12 volt man should nothing have been done, should the "nanny" state left the status quo as is?
And? What's your point? Are you comparing a few blacks who were negative towards you to 250 years of systemic racism? Doesn't fly in my book.
Jetgirl said:Should the government be trying to forcibly correct what it at most these days a social issue?
What really gets me, is that I, who was raised to be a colorblind as possible without forcibly removing my eyes, am catching flack for things done by dead people to other dead people.
No black person living today was ever an American slave. No white person living today was a slave holder. How long do white people who haven't done anything have to say "Sorry" for things that people who don't exist anymore did?
I'm not sorry, because I never did those things, and decry them.
I am trying to achieve the actual equality (as in everyone is treated completely equally) that has been trumpeted so long, and it seems like the people who were so adamanet for calling for it now want it not to happen.
12volt_man said:The Civil Rights Act and Voting Act were about the extent to which the government should be involved.
By the way, Democrats fought hard to defeat both of those.
12volt_man said:But I thought Boston was a Democrat haven.
12volt_man said:But isn't that all the more reason they need the nanny state to come in and level the playing field?
If they're going to be consistent, then they should say, "if we are going to have a colorblind society, then we must legislate that N.B.A. teams give preference to white players."
MethodMan said:You sound like my wife. GET OFF THE NET AND COOK MY DINNER!![]()
Jetgirl said:In the midst of this I do have a sugestion:
If we're going to help disadvantaged people make it to college, why not do it on the basis of economic status and basic qualifications?
That would ensure that it the process would not involve race, but that everyone who is coming from a blighted area or has severe economic hardships would get a leg-up.
mhatten said:and you think that would have been enough to turnt he tide of racism? You have more faith in people than I do.
Really, interesting, BTW the way did you know those peple were white?
12volt_man said:Racism cannot be legislated. It's something that happens in the minds of the racists.
Reverse racism, which is really all that affirmative action is, only re-enforces racist ideas in the mind of the racist.
I did. They were white Democrats.
mhatten said:I have no porblem with this, it is unfortunate that this basically equates to race also but I have no problem with that at all.
Neverstop said:Racism has been legislated SOOOOOOO many times in the US I am surprised this claim has been made. Most OBVIOUS example..."Whites Only"
AA is NOT reverse racism because it is NOT African Americans as a group, oppressing whites as a group.