Additional Advisors added to CF Governance

Angeldove97 · Apr 27, 2008

Congrats to Matt, Sylvia, and Mary. They're three very hard working individuals, who are amazing at staying on top of issues and knowing what's what.

It may seem like old Alpha coming alive, but I trust these 5 individuals very much and I think they'll all do an excellent job! I can't imagine the huge workload Constance and Ron had to deal with so hopefully this will take a little bit of pressure off of their shoulders!

Good luck and God bless--- I'm sure the Lord will bless this ministry

drstevej · Apr 28, 2008

ADVISORS

Press Here

Communicate !!!!!!!

mnphysicist · Apr 28, 2008

Rep Daddy said:
This is a lot like the old Alpha Team structure Erwin had several years ago.

That concerns me a lot.

CONCERN: Five people making a decision can be more cumbersome than two. And if five people can make unilateral decisions we have a hydra. CF needs a COO to complement LeeD as CEO.

Agreed on 5 people making decisions... however, when 2 are needed and one is gone, things can drag on forever. The intent being, that only 3 are needed to make a decision... and that could mean 2 are away, 2 agree, and 1 disagrees, and the decision moves forward. It should be a lot faster.... however in the short term as we build the team, we are trying to involve all 5.... and that is near insanity, even simple decisions can take many many days. However, this is just a short term aberation as we work through the process. It will end.

As far as the COO part goes, thats in Lee's domain. If we were to operate in an Alpha model, I would advocate for it, otherwise things will grind to a stop, much worse than when it was just the 2 of us. However, in trying not to be alpha it may not be needed. Ultimately though, that one is Lee's call.

Erwin's system worked when he spent a lot of time in Alpha reading issues and giving direction. The frequency of Lee's input you describe, Ron, is frankly not enough unless Advisors have specific tasks and lines of authority.

I agree with you on this... and if we had to involve all 5, and come to some conclusion as a group, no way would it be enough.

My guess is this will not be an improvement despite having very good advisors.

As it is it can be impossible to get a simple answer to a question. And, Ron, I know you know what I mean.

Yep, I do know what you mean, all too well. Please see above; it should be a short term aberation... certainly if we were to operate in this mode for more than 2-3 weeks, advisors in short order would become totally ineffective.

constance · Apr 28, 2008

Being the only person who was on old alpha and is now an advisor, my opinion is that this group is nothing like it.

On Alpha, the 4 people (ops dir, chaplain, PAD, and CAD) had to wait for everyone to vote, even if they had a 3/4 vote, you had to wait for so-n-so to get back.

The group that we have now (and I think we'll be adding one more) is a diverse and skilled group of people. We have agreed that if I'm out of town, they act without me, etc. I'm not responsible for defending any particular group of people. We are all interested in the best interest of the entirety of CF.

Akathist · Apr 28, 2008

mnphysicist said:
Please welcome our three new advisors

Arborvita is now an advisor

Profmom is now an advisor

meh is now an advisor

Constance and I will remain.

Arbor and I have yet to figure out how to split up the Grand Poobah title. 1000 blessings to the most creative way of splitting a Poobah.

For reference, the CF org chart is located at
http://christianforums.com/faq.php?faq=job_descriptions#faq_cfgovernance

I don't usually comment in announcement threads but there is no equivalent thread in the staff area that I could find.

I think the added staff are the most objective and dedicated staff and the best ones to pick.

There were times in the past when people with an agenda seemed to keep getting placed into those positions and I really don't see any of these people with that kind of an attitude at all. They are all people I would trust to be fair even to people whose theology they would disagree with.

There have also been times when we as staff have really needed to get an Advisor and when one is away handling things in "real life" it can be hard.

I think being an Advisor is extremely time consuming and I was worried it would burn the two of you out so this will even out the load more and that I think will be good for CF as it will mean less of a turn over.

drstevej · Apr 28, 2008

constance said:
The group that we have now (and I think we'll be adding one more) is a diverse and skilled group of people. We have agreed that if I'm out of town, they act without me, etc. I'm not responsible for defending any particular group of people. We are all interested in the best interest of the entirety of CF.

I hope it works great. You have good people, it is the system that concerns me. Minor decisions will be fine; but controversial decisions (ones that have blow back) made when one or more were not consulted will test your team.

How Lee relates to the team and it's decisions will be interesting. Is he agreed not to over ride decisions the Advisors make? If not, folks may not consider a decision final until he speaks.

The title Advisors seems a misnomer. You are not simply advisors, you are an Executive Board making decisions.

In any case, I wish you guys well and appreciate the communication here.

Victory of the Cross · Apr 29, 2008

Yeah a few names there are people I had the honour of modding with, and they're great people, so CF has the possibility to move forward in leaps and bounds... plus i'm a huge fan of red tape

mnphysicist · Apr 29, 2008

Rep Daddy said:
I hope it works great. You have good people, it is the system that concerns me. Minor decisions will be fine; but controversial decisions (ones that have blow back) made when one or more were not consulted will test your team.

Big and or controversial ones are Lee's call fortunately.

We do very much act like advisors, and present options to Lee on the biggies... not so much on the little things. Ie, the new statement of faith and promotion rule, which I'll announce later today, was a result of Lee's direct input. Other things, which we commonly run into, ie staffing questions and the like are in our domain.

How Lee relates to the team and it's decisions will be interesting. Is he agreed not to over ride decisions the Advisors make? If not, folks may not consider a decision final until he speaks.

On the big calls, Lee makes them, so its not an issue for the most part.

The title Advisors seems a misnomer. You are not simply advisors, you are an Executive Board making decisions.

We are on the minor things yes, but whether staffer A should be promoted, or staffer B should be removed are much less significant than coming up with a new statement of faith or promotion rule.

In any case, I wish you guys well and appreciate the communication here.

Thank you

Crazy Liz · Aug 10, 2008

constance said:
Being the only person who was on old alpha and is now an advisor, my opinion is that this group is nothing like it.

On Alpha, the 4 people (ops dir, chaplain, PAD, and CAD) had to wait for everyone to vote, even if they had a 3/4 vote, you had to wait for so-n-so to get back.

The group that we have now (and I think we'll be adding one more) is a diverse and skilled group of people. We have agreed that if I'm out of town, they act without me, etc. I'm not responsible for defending any particular group of people. We are all interested in the best interest of the entirety of CF.

Hey, Constance!

Are you still around? I haven't seen you in a long time.

Crazy Liz · Aug 10, 2008

mnphysicist said:
Big and or controversial ones are Lee's call fortunately.

We do very much act like advisors, and present options to Lee on the biggies... not so much on the little things. Ie, the new statement of faith and promotion rule, which I'll announce later today, was a result of Lee's direct input. Other things, which we commonly run into, ie staffing questions and the like are in our domain.

On the big calls, Lee makes them, so its not an issue for the most part.

We are on the minor things yes, but whether staffer A should be promoted, or staffer B should be removed are much less significant than coming up with a new statement of faith or promotion rule.

Thank you

And I miss you too, Ron.

Chaplain David · Sep 12, 2008

ProfessorMom said:

It will get better.

Additional Advisors added to CF Governance

Angeldove97

I trust in You

More options

drstevej

"The crowd always chooses Barabbas."

More options

mnphysicist

Have Courage to Trust God!

More options

constance

The littlest billy goat gruff

More options

Akathist

Theology Team

More options

drstevej

"The crowd always chooses Barabbas."

More options

Victory of the Cross

Jesus is the Word of God

More options

mnphysicist

Have Courage to Trust God!

More options

Crazy Liz

Well-Known Member

More options

Crazy Liz

Well-Known Member

More options

Chaplain David

CF Chaplain

More options

Similar threads

Additional Advisors added to CF Governance

I trust in You

"The crowd always chooses Barabbas."

Have Courage to Trust God!

The littlest billy goat gruff

Theology Team

"The crowd always chooses Barabbas."

Jesus is the Word of God

Have Courage to Trust God!

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

CF Chaplain

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency