AVBunyan said:There is a difference. They are both spelled differently. This is why I am a King James Bible Believer - I stick with the text as it stands perfectly in the 1611AV - I believe if God wanted forgiveness there then He would have put forgivness there. But I appreciate your comments.
I believe the KJV was inspired by God. Look at the reason behind the translation and the meticulous way in which it was approached. No other translation had that much work thrown into it. The other versions are merely spinoffs of the KJV written to accomodate a religious belief system rather than an all-out attempt to give us an accurate English translation from the original script.Oblio said:So you believe the KJV translators were inspired ?
Do you believe that their personal interpretation of the Greek is more accurate than the Greek text itself ?
HeyVxer1000 - We'll talk about your belief on Acts 2:38 later but right now I just want to shout over your defense of the 1611AV - Gloooooooorrrriiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!! Thanks - I needed that. Good job Vxer1000!Vxer1000 said:I believe the KJV was inspired by God. Look at the reason behind the translation and the meticulous way in which it was approached. No other translation had that much work thrown into it. The other versions are merely spinoffs of the KJV written to accomodate a religious belief system rather than an all-out attempt to give us an accurate English translation from the original script.
Vxer1000 said:I believe the KJV was inspired by God. Look at the reason behind the translation and the meticulous way in which it was approached. No other translation had that much work thrown into it. The other versions are merely spinoffs of the KJV written to accomodate a religious belief system rather than an all-out attempt to give us an accurate English translation from the original script.
Read 1 Peter 3.18-21 if you do not think baptism saves us or that John 3 is referring to the water of the amniotic sac.prodigal said:The water that Jesus is referring to when he says "born of water and the spirit", is the first birth that we all experience, the fluid in the amniotic sac. What makes a Christian different is that we are also born of the spirit, which takes place when we accept Christ as our Lord and savior. Immersion into water is a symbol of what has already taken place in our hearts. Baptism into water does not save us, it is the "baptism of our hearts" that produces a "new creation".
The water that Jesus is referring to when he says "born of water and the spirit", is the first birth that we all experience, the fluid in the amniotic sac.
What church are you referring to? I don't have my Bachelors in history or in anything for that matter. King James may not have been a Christian or even remotely close, but everyone always seems to miss this one important point: God could have used anyone to translate the scriptures. He just happened to use King James much the same way He used pharoah. (Romans 9.17 For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth.) Besides all this history the KJV is the version through which God speaks clearly to me in spite of all the "thees" and "thous".Oblio said:So do you think the heterodox translators were inspired, but the Church that compiled the original texts is not ?
Excellent post, Colabomb!!Colabomb said:I will answer the actual original Question, instead of going off on the KJV thing.
Acts 2:38 is very clear on what it says.
People often claim Sola Scriptura (which isn't Scriptural anyway lol), and emphasize Sola, while ignoring Scriptura.
Scripture Says to repent and be Baptised for the Remission of your Sins. The Bible Teaches it, the Church for the last 2000 years has taught it, and it is true.
OK then I challenge you to compare two verses. Go to the famous Matt. 28:20 - there Jesus told you to observe what He said, right? OK then go back to Matt. 23:3 and then read real close. Jesus just told you to observe what the Pharisees commanded - they spoke of the OT law. Now if you are going to be consistent and obey the Lord Jesus then you must obey law according to the Pharisees commands. You have to be careful in making blanket statements regarding obedience - you may get yourself in a bind (law).Polycarp1 said:Excellent post, Colabomb!!
Let's be clear on one thing: Whatever one believes about the purpose and function of Baptism, the reiterated command, "Repent and be baptized" means that any Christian is obliged to do what the Lord commands. That means: Be baptized.
But there is a difference between failing, and repenting of that sin, and intentionally ignoring for your entire life a command of Christ.AVBunyan said:OK then I challenge you to compare two verses. Go to the famous Matt. 28:20 - there Jesus told you to observe what He said, right? OK then go back to Matt. 23:3 and then read real close. Jesus just told you to observe what the Pharisees commanded - they spoke of the OT law. Now if you are going to be consistent and obey the Lord Jesus then you must obey law according to the Pharisees commands. You have to be careful in making blanket statements regarding obedience - you may get yourself in a bind (law).
Also, do you follow everything the Lord taught in Matt. 24? Called anybody a fool lately? Have you failed to forgive someone lately - if you so then you ar unforgiven yourself - now compare that with Eph. 1:7 and Col. 1:14.
Again, consider Paul first and the rest will fall into place.
May God bless your studies
AVBunyan said:What some people don't understand is that people are not saved and justified by anythign they do. What justifies a man according to scripture is the faith of Jesus Christ. Water can't wash away sins - only the shed blood of Christ can do that and that has been done.
Salvation is in a person not a system of things you do. Your faith didn't justify it was Christ's faith (Gal. 2:16, Rom. 3:22). Man's faith is absolutely worthless when it comes to salvation. The faith you get to believe comes from God so it is not even your faith. This idea of man doing something and thinking his obedience to a message will save him is false. Your obedience, your faith cannot save you. Your faith in the right message won't save you.
Do you know what saves a man - Christ and Christ alone. This was my whole point on even entering into this discussion to show that salvation is based upon a person not your obedience to a message. Once one begins to talk about his faith and obedience to a message then your salvation shifts from what Christ did to what man thinks he can do.
Question - "What saved you?"
Asnwer - "My faith in Jesus Christ and what he did at Calvary."
Sounds good but still is wrong. Your faith didn't save you.
Question - what saved you?
Scripture answer - Christ.
May God bless
I never said one should not have works as a result of our justification - Paul is very clear on this in Eph. 4:1.Vxer1000 said:Our actions are an indication of our faith:
Baptism is not a work, it is our spiritual birth, but the scripture still applies in that our actions indicate our faith just as Abraham when he was told to sacrifice his son.
I have a question for you. When Christ commanded the men to go out and Baptize in the Name of the Father and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, did He mean that? Or was it just a suggestion?AVBunyan said:I never said one should not have works as a result of our justification - Paul is very clear on this in Eph. 4:1.
Now I have some questions if you don't mind:
1. Accorindg to Eph. 4:5 - there is one baptism today - is it water (as you say in JOhn 3 and Acts 2) or the spiritual baptism of Col. 2:11,2? - They are different and the answer can't be both - there is only one - which one is it?
2. According to Gal. 2:16 what justified you?
Now, I will await your answers and then we can go on if you like. Now you don't have to answer and I'll understand but there is "reasoning to my madness"
Also you used, "shall enter into the kingdom of heaven" - not the issue here is getting into the kingdom of heaven - two things to note:
1. This was said before Christ died at Calvary - the issue of the death, burial and resurrection for sins was not even known about - even Christ's faithful disciples didn't know about it (Luke 18:34)!
2. The issue here is the kingdom of heaven - a literal, physical land that was promised to Israel that they will enter into one day at the end of the tribulation. The issue here was not salvation as we think of it today. Not until you get to Paul's gospel do you get the message of salvation for today.
Acts 2:38 was a message to Jews regarding their rejection of their Messian in anticipation of the second advent - you couldn't find a Christian in Cats 2 with an elctron miscroope - the whole setting was Jewish and the purpose for Calvary was not yet fully revealed so to use Acts 2:38 as a slavtion message won't cut it.
Also I'm still waiting for those who say they have to obey all that Chrsit commanded to respond to my challenge to Matt. 28:20 compared with Matt. 23:3 - haven't had anybody yet pick up that gauntlet. I'm patiently waiting for somebody to explain that one.
Finally one more question - who are you going to believe?
Paul -the apostle to the Gentiles with the advanced revelation from Jesus regarding the body of Christ?
Or...
Peter - the apostle to the circumcism with the message to the Jewish nation during Acts?
Which one are you going to take today - they had different messasges for different people for different times - which one are you going to go by?
May God bless