• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

ACLU Wants Cross Removed from Cemetary Plot

Paula

Veteran
Oct 15, 2003
1,352
102
67
Arizona
Visit site
✟24,678.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Others
The Catholic Chaplain's Monument
[size=+3]At Arlington National Cemetery[/size]

catholic-chaplians-monument-042304.jpg
 
Upvote 0

notto

Legend
May 31, 2002
11,130
664
55
Visit site
✟29,869.00
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Paula said:
That seems to be at the heart of many people's fears. The ACLU is certainly heading in that direction.

Actually, I don't think they will. There are many monuments that at this point are historical and the monuments at Arlington are fairly diverse. I don't think they would have a problem with a monument of catholic chaplins having a cross on it. That ones sort of a no brainer.

They also don't have a problem with personal markers having religious symbols on them. That is just a plain lie. The ACLU also doesn't make these cases themselves, they represent citizens. Until a citizen approaches them with a case, they would not get involved with a legal action.
 
Upvote 0

praying

Snazzy Title Goes Here
Site Supporter
Jan 9, 2004
32,648
1,608
68
New Jersey
✟108,540.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
starchild said:
Cy is dead. The man who owns the site is dead and apparently not buried there (pure speculation, as is speculating that he IS buried there...)

So, if the marker's there waiting for the owner to be buried there, and if Cy is the owner, and if Cy is dead....

WHERE IS CY????


:D :D


Cy is lost in cyberspace. ^_^
 
Upvote 0

Paula

Veteran
Oct 15, 2003
1,352
102
67
Arizona
Visit site
✟24,678.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Others
Illuminatus said:
So...they're lighting this thing with natural gas? Kerosene? Peat moss?

Could be one of those mercury vapor dawn-to-dusk security lights, or maybe even solar powered. Battery packs are another alternative source of energy for lighting systems commonly used in landscaping.

notto said:
Actually, I don't think they will. There are many monuments that at this point are historical and the monuments at Arlington are fairly diverse.

As are the monuments at the Ohio cemetery.

I don't think they would have a problem with a monument of catholic chaplins having a cross on it. That ones sort of a no brainer.

Well, that's mighty big of them. Still no telling where they will draw the line, which emphatically underscores the need for common-sensical solutions by common-sense judges to mundane issues such as this.

They also don't have a problem with personal markers having religious symbols on them. That is just a plain lie.

This is a direct contradiction of what you said earlier:

The government can't give special rights of privilage (such as selling two square feet of ground for religious markers) to individuals for use as a publically endorsed religious monument
.


A sidenote: Burial plots are much larger than two square feet of ground.

More importantly, given the information we currently have, the ACLU just doesn't seem to have a cogent argument.

The ACLU also doesn't make these cases themselves, they represent citizens. Until a citizen approaches them with a case, they would not get involved with a legal action.

The ACLU is only too happy to oblige, as evidenced by their vigilante-style tactics. They know full well this small town doesn't have the wherewithal to fund a full-blown litigation, so they try to coerce them into "settling" in lieu of going to trial, and voilà--someone's rights get flushed down the tube. There are many other cases like this, but that would be best discussed on another thread.
 
Upvote 0

Brad'sDad

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2004
407
31
59
Aztlan
✟23,251.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Republican
Alarum said:
Guys, I think we can draw a logical distinction between a gravesite marked with a cross and an 8-foot high attention-getting device. Seriously, an 8-foot tall lit cross in a graveyard? It's a place to mourn the dead, not Vegas!

Boy, have you missed the boat! What we're discussing is whether a cross in a public cemetery is legal, and also what business does the aclu have poking its nose around in how people bury their dead?
 
Upvote 0

Alarum

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2004
4,833
344
✟6,792.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Democrat
Brad'sDad said:
Boy, have you missed the boat! What we're discussing is whether a cross in a public cemetery is legal, and also what business does the aclu have poking its nose around in how people bury their dead?
No, you've missed the boat. There's a question of scale. Building a 2 story building requires pretty simple permits. Building a 20 story building on the same site is probably illegal, and certainly difficult to get approval for.

In this case the cross is NOT on a tombstone, is huge and gawdy, and frankly, ridiculous.

To change this slightly, if a wiccan wanted a tasteful pentagram on her tombstone I don't think anyone would have a problem. If she wanted to erect an 8 foot tall pentagram with glowing red lights, I think there's a problem.
 
Upvote 0

praying

Snazzy Title Goes Here
Site Supporter
Jan 9, 2004
32,648
1,608
68
New Jersey
✟108,540.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
starchild said:
I see you mhatten... and I know what you're thinking:

This is the state with the Styrofoam Jesus, right?


LOL...Wehn I sqw the picture I thought, gee that would go great with the Styrofoam Jesus. It is utterly tacky.
 
Upvote 0