Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The entire solar system would be a dot on that scale. You don't see a problem with that?
The problem is that you reject anything other than your preconceived ideas, so even if we were able to provide a scale model, you would still reject it.The problem is earth does not orbit the sun & the sun is not at the centre & their are no planets, they are stars. It's that easy, why would God complicate it ?
Nobody can. There are billions of stars. Good luck with a model showing them all. All models must be simplified in some aspect.Never mind, you can't produce one, no prob..........
It could be basically anybody, I said something like that too. Because nothing you have shown so far works even for the most common things we observe, like eclipses, seasons, planets... None shows firmament, columns holding the sky. None explains how the travel around the world works or even how GPS can work.Someone said on here that the F/E's ' can't even give a model of the f/e', I think it was @prodromos .....
By the way, a physical, mechanical model of the solar system is called an orrery. Naturally, they aren't made to scale, because an accurate scale mechanical model would have to be humongous. But they can make pretty nifty models that display the orbits of the planets and their moons anyway.
Imagine a large beach, with billions of sand grains that goes for thousands of kilometers.I don't see why that somebody can't produce a down scaled model ???
Imagine a large beach, with billions of sand grains that goes for thousands of kilometers.
Make a real scale model that displays one specific grain (e.g. our sun), but in the same time the whole beach (e.g. all the stars at once). Its illogical. You cannot show both a small detail and the whole picture in one step. You must always focus on one of the aspects.
It does not show all the stars. Which was your requirement. Also, the scale of the sun and the planets is all wrong.Look at the post above............
It does not show all the stars. Which was your requirement. Also, the scale of the sun and the planets is all wrong.
The scaled Solar system objects look like this:
It's clear that neither you nor Flat Earth Dave have any comprehension as to what you are asking.Never mind
It's clear that neither you nor Flat Earth Dave have any comprehension as to what you are asking.
Flat Earth Dave seems to think he has a "gotcha" for globe earth models but he is really only demonstrating how small minded he is.
Other stars aren't part of the solar system, so they're not part of a solar system model. A model might have some star-style decoration in the background just for flavor.It shows all the stars drifting in space any old where
Other stars aren't part of the solar system, so they're not part of a solar system model. A model might have some star-style decoration in the background just for flavor.
You believe that the firmament is solid, hard (thats why you claim rockets cannot leave the Earth). Nothing can move in it.The stars move within the firmament in which the same constellations are seen daily. They are not wondering around in space any old how.
King James Bible
He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names.
I'm aware of your FE belief about the stars. No need for you to elaborate.The stars move within the firmament in which the same constellations are seen daily. They are not wondering around in space any old how.
King James Bible
He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names.
I'm aware of your FE belief about the stars. No need for you to elaborate.
You believe that the firmament is solid, hard (thats why you claim rockets cannot leave the Earth). Nothing can move in it.
So explain it.You misunderstand.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?