Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
reverend B said:we will miss you. goodnight.
reverend B said:wherever two or more gather in my name, there shall i be in the midst of them.
this is not a solo sport, this faith, adiya. goodnight, and God bless you, in Jesus name.
Adiya said:No it isn't. It's only obvious to those who support abortion, or who do not believe in God and wish to oppose somebody who does.
Argent said:There's no free pass necessary if the women doesn't allow herself to be impregnated by a "horrid" man, right?
Both are not left with the baby. Is the man financially responsible? Yes, but good luck with the "horrid" ones. Is the man ethically responsible for the rearing of his children? Yes, but good luck with the "horrid" ones on the that too.
Yes, some men are abdicating their half of the job. That's nothing new. What you fail to acknowledge is that the woman carries the child, she gives birth to the child, and she is the one who is much more likely to rear the child alone if she opens her knees for a "horrid" man.
Therefore, a woman should be very, very, very careful who she lets between her legs, no matter how much he says he loves her, no matter how horny she is, no matter how hot he is, no matter how hot she thinks the sex is going to be.
If a woman lets a man impregnate her, she had bettered be very sure that she and he are committed to raising that baby into adulthood. Unwanted pregnancy is not justification for tearing a baby out of it's mother's womb. You want the adult pleasure, you have to take the adult responsibility.
mhatten said:I am jumping in late, but I just want to say I am pro-life and believe in God and I believe you are/were mistaken. The poster pointed out what the statistics quite clearly show. White babies are gobbled up and minority and disabled babies/children aren't. You can't fight the facts and those are the facts.
reverend B said:i think i remained civil while you accused me of being satan's spawn. i would be happy to hear other peoples takes on this, as this has become surreal to me. the poster has said you misunderstood their post. this is just silly adiya. why is there absolutely noone that sees it like you do, including the people who would presumably be experts on the intent of what they wrote? it must be very lonely to be the only one that has been imbued with the truth. do not use scripture to cover your own failings. it is a great disservice to the Word.
pride goeth before the fall.
h2whoa said:Here's a viable solution to abortion: "pro-lifers" should be forced to adopt all unwanted children in their country of residence. Of course, the adoptions will be shared out between all the pro-lifers evenly so as not to be unfair.
What do you think?
sensualis said:And you. Holy crap. I have never seen a minister act like you. You're encouraging other people to rip at that lady. What kind of minister does that? Sure no minister I have ever met.
Now I don't claim to be a christian, but if anybody would keep me from becoming one, it would be you.
Also, what's with all of the small letters and no caps? I've never seen an educated person claiming to be a college grad minister use only lower case. Usually just kidding hackers and people like that type in all lower case.
Where's your humility?
sensualis said:I'm jumping in late here too, but I have to say that you are way off mhatten. That person didn't give any stats. Just to show you I'm being fair, I'll tell you I'm not anti-abortion. I'm pro-choice. I can spot when somebody is making posts just to start something. That one post that started it was a dare. She said something about only white people adopting babies, but not in a serious tone, and she did it to make a point. She made it sound like white rich people are anti abortion and poor people of other races aren't. That's just plain wrong. If you can't see that then, whatever. That was a mocking post dude. I don't blame an anti-abortion person who happens to not be white for saying that people are wrong to think that only whites are pro-choice.
Silent Bob said:The poster Adiya was responding to was being sarcastic to make a point which Adiya misread and continues to misread.
loriersea said:But only if they are healthy white infants, right? Otherwise, that's just not faaairrrrr!
loriersea said:This makes me sad. There are plenty of children who need homes; the foster care system is full of them. But, most of them are over 2, many of them aren't white, and a good number of them have a disability of some kind.
This is partly why I see so much dishonesty in the anti-legal abortion movement. Honestly, I think a big part of the drive behind it is the desire to create a large pool of adoptable white babies. If we can get more pregnant white teens to give up their babies, then there will be a big pool of healthy white babies for infertile couples, some of whom seem to believe that they are "owed" a baby (although obviously not all have that attitude). That's just sad and wrong
Adiya said:Here, she is making a joke out of forcing people to adopt children, and suggesting that they should only be healthy and white otherwise it's not fair. You all think that I am on her about the idea that only whites adopt, or only white babies are wanted for adoption and that's not it.
My stance is that this is an irresponsible stereotype, which I have seen too many pro-choicers adopt.
Over-reacting? Another unwanted stereotype.Silent Bob said:This was an opinion. And if you trully want to prove it wrong you can, without over-reacting.
Oh... ok, I can understand how a white guy like yourself wouldn't be able to see how a non-white, pro-life, woman, like myself would be offended at the suggestion that pro-lifers just want to make more white babies so they can be adopted by white families. Sure.... it makes perfect sense to me now.It may be wrong or it may be right. I think that it is wrong. But I don't see how you could be so deeply offended by this opinion.
I admit, sometimes I say things that I later look at and laugh about, but seriously.... why would you ask a pro-life supporting woman of mixed race (part black) why she would be offended at the idea that pro-lifers just want to make more white babies? Seriously!
I'll wait. I have all the time in the world. You just go ahead and answer. I'm patient. 
Adiya said:Oh... ok, I can understand how a white guy like yourself wouldn't be able to see how a non-white, pro-life, woman, like myself would be offended at the suggestion that pro-lifers just want to make more white babies so they can be adopted by white families. Sure.... it makes perfect sense to me now.![]()
my humility was being expressed by asking others to evaluate the situation because i had lost my objectivity and needed a third opinion. it seemed so outside the realm of reason to me that i started to think i might have missed something. it was not an invitation to pile on. you are projecting something personal on me, for whatever reason.sensualis said:And you. Holy crap. I have never seen a minister act like you. You're encouraging other people to rip at that lady. What kind of minister does that? Sure no minister I have ever met.
Now I don't claim to be a christian, but if anybody would keep me from becoming one, it would be you.
Also, what's with all of the small letters and no caps? I've never seen an educated person claiming to be a college grad minister use only lower case. Usually just kidding hackers and people like that type in all lower case.
I really have to wonder about you. I don't doubt that you are a christian cuz you say you are and who am I to judge. I'm not sure that I would ever choose to be one however, if you were the only example I was ever given. Where's your humility?