• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Abortion Solution

Status
Not open for further replies.

h2whoa

Ace2whoa - resident geneticist
Sep 21, 2004
2,573
286
44
Manchester, UK
✟4,091.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Here's a viable solution to abortion: "pro-lifers" should be forced to adopt all unwanted children in their country of residence. Of course, the adoptions will be shared out between all the pro-lifers evenly so as not to be unfair.

What do you think?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sundragon2012

momalle1

Veteran
Sep 27, 2005
1,995
162
✟25,482.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
h2whoa said:
Here's a viable solution to abortion: "pro-lifers" should be forced to adopt all unwanted children in their country of residence. Of course, the adoptions will be shared out between all the pro-lifers evenly so as not to be unfair.

What do you think?
I've always felt this way. I've never seen "pro-lifers" do much except argue about abortion being murder. It's high time to put your money where your mouth is. Change laws so that it's easier to adopt an American child than an Asian child, in fact, make it easier and cheaper while making sure the child is placed into a home where they won't be abused. Change the foster system so that people are not taking children in for the profit, and finally, vote to spend some real money towards child welfare, not a small band of over-worked, underpaid social workers.
 
Upvote 0

CSmrw

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2006
1,943
140
56
✟32,850.00
Faith
Atheist
momalle1 said:
I've always felt this way. I've never seen "pro-lifers" do much except argue about abortion being murder. It's high time to put your money where your mouth is. Change laws so that it's easier to adopt an American child than an Asian child, in fact, make it easier and cheaper while making sure the child is placed into a home where they won't be abused. Change the foster system so that people are not taking children in for the profit, and finally, vote to spend some real money towards child welfare, not a small band of over-worked, underpaid social workers.

But we NEEEEEED that F-22, because the Euros are starting to build fighters that can compete with the....F-15. How can we afford needlessly advanced and appallingly expensive weopon systems if we siphon off 3-10% to pay for a healthy population?

This world is not under sin, it's under stupid.
 
Upvote 0

h2whoa

Ace2whoa - resident geneticist
Sep 21, 2004
2,573
286
44
Manchester, UK
✟4,091.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
loriersea said:
But only if they are healthy white infants, right? Otherwise, that's just not faaairrrrr!

I dunno. Maybe the Church Elders, erm... I mean Bush administration, could offer Heaven Bonus points if you really go out on a limb and adopt a child that was going to be aborted because of some terribly debilitating condition.
 
Upvote 0

Catholicism

Veteran
May 2, 2005
1,628
40
37
✟2,027.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
h2whoa said:
Here's a viable solution to abortion: "pro-lifers" should be forced to adopt all unwanted children in their country of residence. Of course, the adoptions will be shared out between all the pro-lifers evenly so as not to be unfair.

What do you think?
Well, at least youy believe that the Fetus is a child. I say it's better than our current state of "don't want Him, kill Him."
 
  • Like
Reactions: DieHappy
Upvote 0

Skinster007

Active Member
Aug 15, 2005
106
14
51
✟323.00
Faith
Christian
Here's a better solution. People should be more responsible and stop having unwanted pregnancies. People always want to come up with a solution after the damage has been done. How about we try to prevent the damage from ever occuring. Instead of handing out condoms after the 12 year old has been having sex, we teach them abstinence before they decide to have sex.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DieHappy
Upvote 0

Thirst_For_Knowledge

I Am A New Title
Jan 20, 2005
6,610
340
43
Michigan
Visit site
✟8,524.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Skinster007 said:
Here's a better solution. People should be more responsible and stop having unwanted pregnancies. People always want to come up with a solution after the damage has been done. How about we try to prevent the damage from ever occuring. Instead of handing out condoms after the 12 year old has been having sex, we teach them abstinence before they decide to have sex.

Or give them condoms before they have sex. The reason teens have this problem is because of abstinence only programs. It seems a bit weird that your solution is to give 'em more of the problem.
 
Upvote 0
B

belladonic-haze

Guest
h2whoa said:
Here's a viable solution to abortion: "pro-lifers" should be forced to adopt all unwanted children in their country of residence. Of course, the adoptions will be shared out between all the pro-lifers evenly so as not to be unfair.

What do you think?

I just wonder how many pro-lifers suddenly become pro abortion........

I have a better idea. Give better sex education and give out free condoms on highschools, bars and so on.....It would lower the rate of teen abortions a lot!

By the way, there are a lot of abortions for other reasons as well..........
 
Upvote 0

h2whoa

Ace2whoa - resident geneticist
Sep 21, 2004
2,573
286
44
Manchester, UK
✟4,091.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
belladonic-haze said:
I just wonder how many pro-lifers suddenly become pro abortion........

I have a better idea. Give better sex education and give out free condoms on highschools, bars and so on.....It would lower the rate of teen abortions a lot!

By the way, there are a lot of abortions for other reasons as well..........

I agree with everything you've said.

My OP was pretty much tongue in cheek although the main point of it was actually summed up in your first sentence!
 
Upvote 0

Skinster007

Active Member
Aug 15, 2005
106
14
51
✟323.00
Faith
Christian
thirstforknowledge said:
Or give them condoms before they have sex. The reason teens have this problem is because of abstinence only programs. It seems a bit weird that your solution is to give 'em more of the problem.

Great so let's start giving kids condoms when they're 5. If I'm walking towards a cliff, your solution is to wrap be in bubble wrap so I have a soft landing. How about you just tell me there's a cliff in front of me so I don't walk off in the first place. Do u have a problem with a 12-16 year old having sex?
 
Upvote 0

h2whoa

Ace2whoa - resident geneticist
Sep 21, 2004
2,573
286
44
Manchester, UK
✟4,091.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Skinster007 said:
Great so let's start giving kids condoms when they're 5. If I'm walking towards a cliff, your solution is to wrap be in bubble wrap so I have a soft landing. How about you just tell me there's a cliff in front of me so I don't walk off in the first place. Do u have a problem with a 12-16 year old having sex?

It's unrealistic to think that you can talk hormonal teens out of having sex. It will happen. Sometimes, if people are going to fall off that cliff regardless of what you say, the only option left is to bubble wrap 'em (to use your analogy).
 
Upvote 0

Thirst_For_Knowledge

I Am A New Title
Jan 20, 2005
6,610
340
43
Michigan
Visit site
✟8,524.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Skinster007 said:
Great so let's start giving kids condoms when they're 5. If I'm walking towards a cliff, your solution is to wrap be in bubble wrap so I have a soft landing. How about you just tell me there's a cliff in front of me so I don't walk off in the first place. Do u have a problem with a 12-16 year old having sex?

The problem is, research doesn't back up your statement. in theory, it sounds nice and correct, but when implemented, it doesn't work.

If my 5 year old needs condoms, I have much more to worry about then teaching them abstinence.

Do I have a problem with 12-16 year olds having sex? It depends, honestly. They should be taught abstinence, but they should also be taught how to protect themselves if they aren't going to refraim. If you were walking towards a cliff, I would tell you there was a cliff up ahead, but also wrap you in bubble wrap, because that is the best thing to do, in case you don't take my advice and decide to go off the cliff anyway.
 
Upvote 0

CSmrw

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2006
1,943
140
56
✟32,850.00
Faith
Atheist
Skinster007 said:
Here's a better solution. People should be more responsible and stop having unwanted pregnancies. People always want to come up with a solution after the damage has been done. How about we try to prevent the damage from ever occuring. Instead of handing out condoms after the 12 year old has been having sex, we teach them abstinence before they decide to have sex.

Because that has been shown not to work. It's like I told me son the other night: you KNOW you should be having sex. Your every fiber demands you have sex. So if I come along, loo dee doo, and tell you DON'T you, being a bratty fourteen year old know it all, will realise almost imediately I am just being a reactionary moron, and you may, considering again you are a bratty know it all 14 year old, actually determine to have sex just to spite me for being so arrogant and self righteous. I would rather you knew all the facts, the good ones and the bad ones, without any of my moralizing or percieved authority trip. And if you decide to ignore all the facts and dive in to some young lady I would absolutely rather you know how to use a condom than not.

And you are ONE OF THE SMART ONES. The DUMB who consititute 99% of your peers, by the way, don't have a hope in hell if some idiot screams "don't" in their faces every day. The statistics seem to bear this out.

I don't know what he will do with the info I gave him. And frankly he is a human being and will do whatever he wants, regardless. But I am willing to bet I don't have grandchildren fro at least eight more years. Any takers?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.