I'm the youngest one posting, But I'm not the childish.
I believe the phrase you're looking for is "most childish."
I'm the youngest one posting, But I'm not the childish.
Paraphrasing, a citation or a quotation would have been nice, rather then just saying that a source supports your claim. At the moment you haven't actually shown Wikipedia to state anything.Look human embryo up on wikipedia.
It is a person.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryowikipeida said:The status of the human embryo is debated among bioethicists. Many Christian ethicists believe that an embryo does, in fact, possess personhood. Gilbert Meilander, for example, identifies conception as the point at which a new individual human being comes into existence, since "when sperm and ovum join to form the zygote, the individual's genotype is established."[2] However, human embryos have been cloned, in which case no new genotype is established.
Violence will end the debate. Round up and kill all the pro-death abortionists. That will clearly prove that the pro-life way is the only wayCan the abortion debate be settled through debate?
Can the abortion debate be settled through violence?
Can the abortion debate be settled through further scientific study?
Can the abortion debate be settled through religion?
Can the abortion debate be settled at all?
Does it need to be? Why? What are you willing to do to settle it?
Can the abortion debate be settled through debate?
Can the abortion debate be settled through violence?
Can the abortion debate be settled through further scientific study?
Can the abortion debate be settled through religion?
Can the abortion debate be settled at all?
Does it need to be? Why? What are you willing to do to settle it?
Look human embryo up on wikipedia.
It is a person.