• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

A Unique Perspective

Aug 28, 2007
1,486
111
West Virginia
✟24,729.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
heavensangelwv said:
Then how do you decided what is a necessity and what is not? Wouldn't you agree that in our area a car is a necessity?
A necessity item really boils down to food. And perhaps hygeine items, that is about the extent of them. A car is a luxury item and many people in our area buy used cars so they wouldn't be taxed at all. And people pay taxes on their vehicles for years, this way they pay a one time tax on new vehicles instead of paying for years and years. In the long run it would be cheaper for people. It is the fairest way. You would have 100% of your money to do as you see fit, this would more than make up for the larger sales tax.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 28, 2007
1,486
111
West Virginia
✟24,729.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
But do you understand that you would not be losing 20-30% of you income in income taxes, plus another 10-30% in state taxes, unemployment, social security, medicare.......whatever else they take from your paycheck (partly depends on where you live).

Why do I get the feeling that I am not getting my point across very well...lol
 
Upvote 0

heavensangelwv

• Who am I, O Lord God? •
Jul 1, 2007
26,732
3,254
West Virginia
✟63,156.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Because your point does not make sense. Virtually everything that you buy that is not food will be taxed 20-30%. You do realize that this would also include food that you buy at a restuarant and any 'junk food' item???? Think about how much you spend on clothes every year... Now imagine if you had six kids to buy for. That is going to be a ridiculous amount of money just in taxes.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 28, 2007
1,486
111
West Virginia
✟24,729.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
So instead of making $15,000 a year after everything is taken out of your pay check of about $24,000, you make $24,000. Instead of spending $15,000, you spend (assuming you buy the same things you bought before and you used your entire $15,000 a year) $19,500 which will leave you with an extra $4,500 that you didn't have before. You could save this money or spend it or do a variety of things with it. Things would be more expensive, but you would have even more money to spend, more than enough to make up for the rise in prices.
 
Upvote 0

heavensangelwv

• Who am I, O Lord God? •
Jul 1, 2007
26,732
3,254
West Virginia
✟63,156.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
No you wouldn't have more money to spend because you would be giving right back to them when you buy anything other than food. Face it... You can't go through life only buying food. Every time you spend $100 you are going to have to spend an extra $20-$30 just to cover the tax. That is really going to add up after a while.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 28, 2007
1,486
111
West Virginia
✟24,729.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I'm getting frustrated, your not understanding...lol
We will have to discuss this sometime when we can do it in depth...lol

Believe me, you would save money. You would not be taxed nearly as much, I think the figure scares you, but you would have more money. You would spend 20-30% more on non-necessity items, but you would have 100% of your income instead of the only 40-60% you would have otherwise in the current system (depending on where you live). Instead of spending a $1.00 (really $1.06..lol) you would be spending about $1.30, but instead of having $1 to spend, you would have $1.80 - $2.20 to spend, so you would have an extra $.50 to $.90 even with the higher price. You would have more money. Believe I would never support something that made people worse off and for the poorest of people they would get reimbursed for the tax completely or have an exemption card of some type so it wouldn't even effect them. In essence there would be no tax on poor people at all.

Am I making any sense to you?...lol
 
Upvote 0
Aug 28, 2007
1,486
111
West Virginia
✟24,729.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Yes, although I think there are more necessity items, I'm just not 100% sure what else besides food and hygeine products would count. My above argument about having more money is based upon non-necessity items, so in essence you would have even more money because you won't only be buying non-necessity items, you would also be buying food and hygeine products.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 28, 2007
1,486
111
West Virginia
✟24,729.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
No, I can tell I am not getting my point across here. I never said you would go through life without buying non-necessity items. Of course you will, but you will have more money to spend (more than enough to make up for the rise in prices). When I said earlier for every $1.00 you spend now on non-necessity items you would spend $1.30, but instead of having a $1.00 to spend in the current system, you would have $1.80 to $2.20 to spend on non-necessity items. So you would have $.50 to $.90 more left. This would allow you to buy around 50% more than you would in the current system, this is NOT even taking into consideration that there would be no taxes on necessity items which brings your purchasing power up even more.
 
Upvote 0

heavensangelwv

• Who am I, O Lord God? •
Jul 1, 2007
26,732
3,254
West Virginia
✟63,156.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
On the farm we spend a lot of money. I am not sure whether feed, fuel, and equipment would count as non-necessity items or not. Some have argued that business expenses are necessity items and should not be taxed.
But, your farm is not technically a business. :p
 
Upvote 0
Aug 28, 2007
1,486
111
West Virginia
✟24,729.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
It is ultimately a profit seeking venture. We must have a plan of how to make it successful and grow. We work on it. It brings in revenue. It takes expenditures. It is a business of sorts...lol, We now consider it s semi-business...lol, We hope to make it a part of a future business, we'll just have to keep working toward that goal.
 
Upvote 0