How do you know? I admit it does not specifically tie the two groups together, but logically it would make sense that the group (the multitude) in the sixth seal is the same group as that in the fifth seal.
You lost me here. I see no "multitude" in the sixth seal text. Here is Rev. 6:12-17 (NASB).
12I looked when He broke the sixth seal, and there was a great (
AI)earthquake; and the (
AJ)sun became black as (
AK)sackcloth made of hair, and the whole moon became like blood; 13and (
AL)the stars of the sky fell to the earth, (
AM)as a fig tree casts its unripe figs when shaken by a great wind.
14(
AN)The sky was split apart like a scroll when it is rolled up, and (
AO)every mountain and island were moved out of their places.
15Then (
AP)the kings of the earth and the great men and the [
c]commanders and the rich and the strong and every slave and free man hid themselves in the caves and among the rocks of the mountains;
16and they (
AQ)said to the mountains and to the rocks, "Fall on us and hide us from the presence of Him (
AR)who sits on the throne, and from the (
AS)wrath of the Lamb;
17for (
AT)the great day of their wrath has come, and (
AU)who is able to stand?"
Yes, these are the martyrs that were told to wait. No doubt about that. And yes, this happens at the start of the millennium. I completely agree.
I'm glad that we can agree.
I've heard this theory before, but I see nothing in scripture to support it.
Isaiah 11:1-10.
Again, I respectfully disagree. Acts 3:21 says "Heaven must receive him until the time comes for God to restore everything, as he promised long ago through his holy prophets."
Verse 20 makes it clear that the "he" in verse 21 is Jesus. "Heaven must receive him" means Jesus goes to heaven. "until the time comes" means he will stay there until a specific time.
So how then can you say that this says nothing about the timing of Jesus' return?
I see why you are getting confused here. The NIV (which you cited) renders the verse as:
21 Heaven must receive him until the time comes for God to restore everything, as he promised long ago through his holy prophets.
While a literal rendition is:
21(
A)whom heaven must receive until the period of (
B)restoration of all things about which (
C)God spoke by the mouth of His holy prophets from ancient time. (NASB)
21 whom heaven must receive until the times of restoration of all things, which God has spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began. (NKJV)
1 Heaven must welcome [
a] Him until the times of the restoration of all things, which God spoke about by the mouth of His holy prophets from the beginning. (Holman).
21whom it behoveth heaven, indeed, to receive till times of a restitution of all things, of which God spake through the mouth of all His holy prophets from the age. (YLT).
ὃν δεῖ οὐρανὸν μὲν δέξασθαι ἄχρι χρόνων ἀποκαταστάσεως πάντων ὧν ἐλάλησεν ὁ θεὸς διὰ στόματος πάντων, ἁγίων αὐτοῦ προφητῶν ἀπ' αἰῶνος (Greek)
The emphasis is in the restoration of all things based on the word given to the prophets not of the restoration of all things beyond what God told the prophets. See the difference? The word ἀποκαταστάσεως (restore, restitution) only occurs here but the verb that it is derived from occurs 8 times in the NT. The concept is one of "restoring things to its former situation" as restoring a strained or dislocated limb to its former state. Matthew uses the verb in 12:13 to show the 'restored' hand as being the same as the other. This noun does not impart a sense of restoring things to newness as in what the New Jerusalem and the new earth will be but to the way it was prior to the fall. Basically to restore things as they were in the garden. That is consistent with the millennium reign of Christ where the animals are docile, and food is plentiful.
This is where I'm going to surprise you. I agree that it happens at the end of the tribulation. And I also believe that this happens at the end of the millennium. See, Daniel 12:1-2 makes it clear that the tribulation happens after the millennium. There are no contradictions in my statements.
We are definitely going to disagree here. You might want to explain your reasoning here since it is not consistent with Daniel 12.