No one in this forum will produce any hard data, anything that has been found that could not be found if neo-darwinian evolution were true. This is my prediction.
There will be rants about how evolution isn't falsifiable. There will be bluster about how the fossil record doesn't have enough transitionals or that we can't be sure the transitionals it does have really are. There will be quotes from scientists who say they have observed stasis in the fossil record, but who would also say there has been quite a lot of change, continuous over longer periods of time, throughout most of the fossil record: two observations that both fit into standard neo-darwinian population genetics, together with the known limits to how often a species will leave behind fossil evidence.
After all this bluster and all of these rants, we will be able to distill ZERO evidence that is contrary to evolution from all of it. Then what will we have?
We will have people who have:
1) No evidence against evolution
2) a poor or incomplete understanding of genetics, biology, taxonomy, and paleontology
3) a theological agenda
4) no scientific credentials,
who are all claiming
1) vocally
2) repeatedly
3) insistently
4) arrogantly
5) derisively
claiming that evolution is not a credible theory.
Draw your own conclusions
There will be rants about how evolution isn't falsifiable. There will be bluster about how the fossil record doesn't have enough transitionals or that we can't be sure the transitionals it does have really are. There will be quotes from scientists who say they have observed stasis in the fossil record, but who would also say there has been quite a lot of change, continuous over longer periods of time, throughout most of the fossil record: two observations that both fit into standard neo-darwinian population genetics, together with the known limits to how often a species will leave behind fossil evidence.
After all this bluster and all of these rants, we will be able to distill ZERO evidence that is contrary to evolution from all of it. Then what will we have?
We will have people who have:
1) No evidence against evolution
2) a poor or incomplete understanding of genetics, biology, taxonomy, and paleontology
3) a theological agenda
4) no scientific credentials,
who are all claiming
1) vocally
2) repeatedly
3) insistently
4) arrogantly
5) derisively
claiming that evolution is not a credible theory.
Draw your own conclusions