Seems simple to me, some liberals cannot tolerate anything that conflicts with their views, so they shout them down, or cancel them or burn them down.
All that and yet where is the evidence? On the other hand we have two plus years of the liberals burning down businesses, assaulting police, and inciting violence against the Justices.
Not quite that simple the court is a coequal branch of government, funny when the decision favors the liberal cause some people use that decision to beat others over the head but when it does not some of these same people turn on the court and make every attempt to discredit it.
Neither the Senate nor the presidency was ever set up to represent the "majority" of the people, so this doesn't seem like it means much. If it's some kind of appeal to democracy, it should be pointed out that Roe v. Wade was the undemocratic decision. It struck down democratically elected laws and declared that such laws could not be enacted even through the normal democratic process. The reversal of Roe v. Wade allows for actual democracy to take place on the issue.
While it is true the Bill of Rights was not intended to be a list of all rights, as the Ninth Amendment indicates, it also isn't a license to just come up with rights out of thin air, which is exactly what they did when they claimed abortion was a constitutional right. If the rights can be plausibly grounded in the history and tradition of the country, it can make sense to apply them (perhaps the classic example is right to travel)--but that is hard to argue in regards to abortion, as the opinion goes into quite some detail on.
You're vague on this point, so it's hard to give a specific answer without a specific quote. I have certainly seen people claim they "lied" about their position on the issue, usually without pointing to any actual quotes--and when they do, one discovers the quotes don't say as much as they supposedly do. They either use totally noncommittal language or are just them saying precedent deserves some degree of respect--just like essentially every court nominee has done for decades now. None ever said they would not overturn Roe v. Wade, or at least no one has ever produced any quote that says that.
Remember this is the same Supreme Court that voted to uphold results of the 2020 election. If this Supreme Court is faulty, which it is not, then Trump would have stayed in power.
You are right. And the best for them would be not to get pregnant if they do not wish to have children. Not kill the baby if they do because they did not want it.
Not at all. Hopefully people wake up and see stupid when it shown.
If we continue to allow anarchy to be spoke and seen as displayed in the OP then it is just a matter of time until Aleister Crowley’s motif is our nations motto. “Do thine own will”.
So no actual quotes of the guy threatening multiple justices, just some talk about what the consequences might be and opinion pieces from the far right.
What did he threaten he'd do to which Justices? For some reason that link doesn't seem to mention them.
