Yes I did. The creation concepts are very well presented in the Darwinist view of how humanity was created.
I vacillate between questioning your honesty or your ability to comprehend simple sentences. It is obvious to anyone who can read that creationism is not represented in the definition for Darwinism. Case closed.
There is no other impetus allowed or presented other than the naturalistic impetus for all of life we observe today. The view that naturalistic processes alone, completely, totally, solely, only are needed to create humanity is at the very core of the inherently atheistic Darwinist creationist view. I can find no other impetus allowed, permitted or considered other than the inherently atheistic Darwinist creationist view. If you know of any, I'd certainly be interested in seeing them.
Another reading comprehension problem. You claim that they are being taught that there is not God behind evolution. I asked you to provide evidence in the form of an approved lesson plan or a textbook. You, of course, simply reiterated your baseless assumption and then shifted the burden of proof to me. I can tell you that it is extremely unlikely that a god is mentioned in lessons on evolution, either as helping or not existing. To support my contention, I would have to provide you with every lesson plan and every textbook used in science classes all over our country. To support your contention, all you have to do is provide one lesson plan or one textbook. You can't do that then your assertion is not worth the pixels we're using to read it.
Nope, it's the truth. Science has not found evidence that humanity is totally, completely, solely, totally the creation of naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago. Post it, if you think it has. Remember, don't respond with your typical common descent evasion, remember the issue is about what, or who, created humanity where humanity did not exist before.
Evidence for common descent is also evidence for common descent without the intervention of an outside entity.
It's just not proof that the outside entity was absent. You seem to be asking for proof. However, most of us here have conceded that our lack of belief in an outside entity starting or guiding common descent is simply our belief and not a guarantee that the entity is missing. You're spinning your wheels here.
Yes they are. Humanity did not exist at a point in time, now it exists. This existence of humanity is only explained by the naturalistic mechanisms creating humanity from a single life form of long long ago according to the Darwinist creationism model being presented in schools.
Find a definition of creationism that does not mention the divine or a god. Then you might have a leg to stand on. They are being taught that humanity
developed from an ancestor ape species via evolution. Gods are not mentioned as being present or being absent. So, it's not creationism.
Sure it's a creationist viewpoint. An inherently atheistic viewpoint.
It can't be both. Learn the definitions used in this controversy and you will end the conjecture that you are either a dishonest or not too bright.
Exactly. The mention is that the only explanation, the only impetus needed to create humanity, is that you, children, are the result of entirely naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago. And then they're taught the error that there is evidence for the creationist view.
The only reason I am writing this again is for anyone reading to see your misrepresentation clearly. Here goes.
Teaching only the mechanics and evidence for evolution and common descent, which is what we have evidence for, is not the same thing as teaching there was no outside entity that caused evolution or guided common descent. In the same way, teaching the only mechanics of molecule building and destruction in chemistry is not the same thing as teaching that there was no outside entity that caused atoms to exist or built the laws behind chemical combining. There is no scientific evidence supporting the hypothesis that there is no entity is behind these things so it doesn't get taught. There is also no scientific evidence supporting the hypothesis that there is an entity behind these things so that doesn't get taught either.
Depends on one's view of creation and evolution. I accept evolution. I don't accept the inherently atheistic viewpoint of Darwinist creationism.
Then you don't accept the view that there was a divine act of creation that ensured the development of modern species through mutation and natural selection? That's my definition for "Darwinist creationism" and until some official definition is provided, when I see that phase, I will comprehend it by my definition. BTW, I take issue with your associating atheism with Darwinist creationism.
Nothing. Why replace it with anything?
So you don't have a problem with what is being taught in school? Why are you complaining then?
They are taught that all of the variety and complexity of life we observe today is the result, totally, completely, only, solely by naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago. I've pointed this out probabaly a hundred times now. The message is clear, God isn't needed or allowed or permitted or accepted in the creation of the complex and varied life forms we observe today. It's an inherently atheistic viewpoint of creation.
Just like chemistry and auto mechanics.
Ignoring your continual mockery, the fact remains, not a single shred of evidence is given that only naturalistic mechanisms created all the complex and varied life forms we observe today.
Not true...you know it...so, it's a lie.
Right, your behavior is my fault, not yours. I understand.
No..no. It is my fault. When faced with behavior like yours, I tend to choose the lower road after a bit. You recall that I was decent to you for quite a while, but you kept up the trolling behavior. I just wanted others to know that this was about you as an individual not your claimed religion or your unstated belief regarding evolution.
Two words. Darwinist creationism.
You mean:
The belief that living organisms originate from the specific act of divine creation which was the ensuring that all species of organisms arise and develop through natural selection of small, inherited variations that increase the individuals ability to compete, survive and reproduce.
You will continue to see those. Unless you ignore me, of course.
I don't mind. I don't ignore people, that's reserved for cowards. If I lose a debate...I lose. No skin off my back and I may learn something....even from you.